Talk:Keystone Ice Miners

	Ice hockey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Why was the Mike Ivall bit deleted?

I don't understand. This had been complained about by two hockey bloggers who actually have connections to Ivall, Chris Smith of Icethetics and Johnny Griswold of PuckDrawn. If you look at the two side-by-side, there's no doubt where Larry Smith got his inspiration from. So why did it go away? 24.87.40.201 (talk) 23:08, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't look like info was deleted, infact there's probably too much info from unrealiable sources (blogs) on what is likely a non-issue. Inspiration doesn't mean copyright infringement, it seems to happen lots in Sports that logos look similar. How many falcons, bulldogs, etc... can you have. The beak is really close but other parts of the logo has drastic differences with the original. Bhockey10 (talk) 22:06, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree that there are many teams using the name Falcons, one has to wonder why a "fighting falcon" needs to be depicted with multicoloured feathers, à la a native American headdress. Complete coincidence? Hard to believe. Oh, wait: Port Huron rotated the image 180 degrees. Completely different logo, except for the beak. Munson66 (talk) 00:51, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How do we know they dropped the logo? I mean, there's no citation, it hasn't been mentioned on PuckDrawn OR Icethetics, and I can't find references to it online. I'm willing to call this vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.87.40.201 (talk) 17:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]