Talk:Paul R. McHugh

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Does anyone else find it odd that such a public figure in the culture war over abortion, gender identity, a member of former president Bush's bio-ethics panel has so little information on wiki?

I have expanded the article and provided a little more info on those subjects. Cheers! 87.196.73.190 (talk) 01:05, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another user has reverted the controversy section, however most info can be verified at the TSRoadmap.com site, and is accurate as far as I can tell. More sources might be necessary, but please do not revert unless the info is indeed not correct (and please do say why and point your sources). The info is not necessarily flattering to the individual, but is pertinent and true. 87.196.173.3 (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So far you haven't provided any source. Each of these statements needs to be backed up by reliable sources. Please read specifically the biography of living person page. --McSly (talk) 01:17, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I've added this to the references section: http://www.tsroadmap.com/info/paul-mchugh.html. It's not pretty in the way of formatting, but I believe the info to be accurate (that page also has outside references). I reckon we need other sources, but it seems to me like the facts. If I'm wrong on any of them, do let me know, ok? Thanks and cheers! 87.196.173.3 (talk) 01:22, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erm... you guys seem a like a tough crowd :) I think at least a little of the material I added is sourced on the link I provided, as well as others in the linked page itself, and are verifiable sources. Why do you keep kaputting all of it? There does seem to be a bit of controversy around McHugh, why not add some? I'm assuming good faith all-round, can we get a discussion going here folks? I'd like to only change the page once we get round to an agreement, shall we get it going? 87.196.74.50 (talk) 00:39, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To Whisky Drinker or whoever keeps tampering with this page. I am using citations and am working carefully on this article. You are destroying dozens of hours worth of work every time you revert the page. Everything that I have put into this article can be verified through other sources and I am putting references in which do just that. It's maddening to have to continue to correct your slashing of my article. Make sure you know what you're doing before knocking out huge sections of someone else's hard work! jxtrent —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jxtrent (talk • contribs) 02:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]