User talk:Lubblobba

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Petcalledros for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Blueboy 96 18:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to fraudulently influence a deletion discussion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy 96 21:13, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

User appears contrite enough, so a little good faith is in order.

Request handled by: Blueboy 96 20:57, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

I do hope you can understand why people are concerned about off-wiki discussion causing undue influence over discussions, here... but at the same time, I'd prefer it if we didn't smack a newcomer with a sledgehammer across the head, just to get our point across. As I don't see any obvious malicious behavior from you, I don't see why a block was called for, here. Will leave a comment with the blocking admin requesting some more explanation; please bear with us in the meantime. – Luna Santin (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On closer review, I see that Blueboy96 notified you of a block, but does not appear to have actually blocked this account from editing (note that the block log for this account is currently empty). Have you tried editing? Either way, feel free to peruse our introduction for newcomers in the meantime. – Luna Santin (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]