User talk:HisSpaceResearch

Archives

Archive 1 (February 2006 to May 2007)
Archive 2 (May 2007 to July 2007)
Archive 3 (July 2007 to October 2007)
Archive 4 (October 2007 to January 2008)
Archive 5 (January 2008 to April 2008)

WP:N/CA

Because of the limited discussion, this proposal was marked rejected. It can be resurrected at any time, and may become useful in the future, but for now, just wanted to thank you for your contributions. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 15:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nikki Catsouras

I have nominated Nikki Catsouras, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Catsouras. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 13:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good....

....to see you back! Pedro : Chat 15:00, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second this; haven't seen you around much lately. Tan ǀ 39 15:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I second this also; we are no lifers, editing pages on Wikipedia, making friends on this bullshit. Good to see you back noob. Hows your mothers basement? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.188.7.120 (talk) 18:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Can-Out of Reach (album cover).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Can-Out of Reach (album cover).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 11:26, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA? Maybe.

I'm still not sure yet. I've been catching myself making a lot of mistakes (though fewer than I have been before), and I'm afraid that someone might single out one foul-up and oppose based solely on that. On the other hand, it seems like half of Wikipedia has mistaken me for an admin at some point... :-P Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:29, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, what the hey. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 21:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Most Phallic Building again

This has been nominated again despite a clear keep only a very short time ago. As such I am informing those who last voted for it to get this AfD kicked off. The reasons all seem to consist of invalid arguments like "silly smut" and "don't like it".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Most_Phallic_Building_contest_(2nd_nomination)#Most_Phallic_Building_contest JJJ999 (talk) 02:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scotland national team review

Scotland national football team has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here.

Please alarm anyone else involved as well. Domiy (talk) 08:54, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Red (song)

I have nominated Red (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scapler (talk) 02:50, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Providence (song)

I have nominated Providence (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Providence (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Scapler (talk) 02:52, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Corpse humping

I have nominated Corpse humping, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpse humping. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:46, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2nd AfD of Alcides Moreno

As you commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcides Moreno (which ended in no consensus) I thought you might like to know that it has been nominated again. The new discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alcides Moreno (2nd nomination). Thryduulf (talk) 11:19, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Nude celebrities on the Internet

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nude celebrities on the Internet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nude celebrities on the Internet (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. – iridescent 16:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello HisSpaceResearch! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 11 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Flavia Vento - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ruby Muhammad

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ruby Muhammad. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruby Muhammad. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:03, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC

I noticed that you participated in a previous RFC at Wikipedia talk:Notability (criminal acts)/Opinions. I was wondering if you might share your opinion here: RFC: Should Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts) be merged with Wikipedia:Notability (events) and Wikipedia:Notability (people)? Thanks! Location (talk) 19:21, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Laquisha Jonz

The article Laquisha Jonz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable BLP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Lionel (talk) 01:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]