Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 July 23

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 173.50.141.8 (talk) at 00:05, 24 July 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

- This is a new article I'd like to publish. Please provide feedback including whether it is ready to be published as is. Thanks.

P.S. I just added another External link resource.

~~Software-surprise (talk) 02:44, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Software-surprise. I took a look at your article about Screenshot Marketing. While the subject could be notable, the article as it stands now does not prove Notability one reason being that there are no references for any asserted facts. You'll also need to study Citing sources for ideas on how to improve the inline-citation aspect of this article.

Hope that helps! Shearonink (talk) 03:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review for publication. I edited it and added a citation (thanks Shearonink).

Thanks.

~~Software-surprise (talk) 05:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to see you added that one reference, however to prove Notability an article will need multiple third-party sources or references that are verifiable and reliable. At Notability please pay special attention to the General notability guideline. In your rough draft an inline citation is needed for every asserted fact ("citation needed"). FYI - There is no need to post a new "Subject" every time you edit something on Screenshot Marketing, simply post further down within the same Request for Feedback. Shearonink (talk) 17:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would welcome any constructive feedback on this piece I've drafted. Thanks for your time.


~~NS0000032 (talk) 06:25, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Pianotech for your advice, however when I try to add citations the article repeats the number ref [1] example taht is already listed against another, and then it just links to the Wikipedia page of the article rather than the website with reliable sources.

I have tried several times, am I missing something out? What I did- Beside the first text that I want reference (link) Look under Works- Bunnets and Bowlers

I added [1] and when I saved change
it repeats ref [1] which just links to the article page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brian_Whittingham

This is my first article for Wikipedia and I am keen to get a grip on how to produce good articles.

~~ScotlandLiteraryLady (talk) 09:28, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discription of the Games Makers, the volunteers for the London 2012 Olympics. This article contain info about previous Olympic Volunteers, and what makes Games Makers different. The Article links to various Olympic related sites. All the information is credible, and in line with the London Organising Commitee of the Olypmic Games discriptions of the role.


~~GamesMaker (talk) 10:09, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have Already completed the review request and move the article from used space to main space but still getting not review message

~~regards deepak (talk) 10:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have now "published" this from draft (I asked for review 3 days ago). So, if it needs comments, please do so)

~~VancoD (talk) 12:37, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Everyone, I am just trying to get a little more feedback on my first wikipedia page. I would appreciate some constructive criticism. Thank you,

Market Development


Just looking for general feedback on this page


~~Hcim (talk) 15:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm trying to write an article about a non-profit organization dedicated to increasing access to arts education. Please take a look and let me know how to make this article ready to be published on Wiki. Thanks.

~~Kaltaf (talk) 16:34, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This has been revised again including additional citations, restructure and great revisions from an unknown user (many thanks).

I'd like to publish it as soon as possible, so please provide your feedback. Thanks much.


~~Software-surprise (talk) 18:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ [1]