Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Dispenza

Joe Dispenza

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable chiropractor noted for an interview in a documentary. Lacks GHits and GNEWS of substance. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 16:55, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. Literally NO coverage in any of the usual Reliable Sources. At Google News, all you find is a few calendar items about book signings, overwhelmed by items about other people named Joe Dispenza, at least two of whom have far more hits than he does. --MelanieN (talk) 04:03, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 01:14, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, being interviewed in a single documentary that is not about you or your work does not confer notability. Tim Vickers (talk) 21:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: He has being interviewed in many more than one "not single" documentary, some of them are: What the bleep do we know?, The Moses Code, and in his own Evolve Your Brain - The Science of Changing Your Mind DVD. About the Google Hits:

[...] Overall, the quality of the search engine results matters more than the raw number. A more detailed description of the problems that can be encountered using a search engine to determine suitability can be found here: Wikipedia:Search engine test.

[...] Although using a search engine like Google can be useful in determining how common or well-known a particular topic is, a large number of hits on a search engine is no guarantee that the subject is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Similarly, a lack of search engine hits may only indicate that the topic is highly specialized or not generally sourceable via the internet.

Furthermore, Dr. Dispenza raise an avant-garde subject as the neurosciencie is, and his first publication deals with several unsolved problems in neuroscience.--Sailorsun (talk) 23:14, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]