This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Oppose. Per the guideline WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, when there are multiple topics that could be referred to by the same name, a topic should be moved to the base title (Head start or Head Start) only if readers are much more likely to be searching for that topic than for any of the others. According to pageview statistics from [1], Head start (positioning) received 1,173 views last month, while Head Start Program received 5,502 views, suggesting to me that users are probably more likely to be looking for the program. The fact that the others derive their name from the "positioning" usage isn't relevant when judging which topic users are actually looking for in an encyclopedia. Propaniac (talk) 17:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I would also like to note some potential confusion about Head start and Head Start. If this article were to be moved to Head start, that would not mean the disambiguation page would have to move from Head Start. It could be argued that since the other three uses are proper names and this one isn't, it might make sense to put this one at Head start and the other three on the dab page at Head Start. However, I would still argue against moving this page, because I think it's more likely that users who search for "Head start" or "head start" are looking for one of the other usages and simply not bothering to capitalize. Propaniac (talk) 17:17, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I don't care for the disambiguator on the current article title, but I also can't be sure it's the primary topic. While Propaniac is right that Head Start could remain a disambiguation page while this article becomes Head start, I don't think it's a great idea. PowersT14:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.