Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chailie Ho

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kleeer (talk | contribs) at 18:25, 6 August 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Chailie Ho (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking GHits of substance and with zero GNEWs. Appears to fail WP:BIO. ttonyb (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment – She did not win an award, she was only a finalist. ttonyb (talk) 14:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Although she was only a finalist in Fashion World Talent Awards, she has been in 4 out of 7 episodes of the whole TV programme that widely broadcast in one of the four main free TV channel in Hong Kong [4]. This award is notable as (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)already has 57,700 hits in google and it has been published across different media. She has been interviewed by papierdoll magazine [5] and approved by the Hong Kong Design Centre [6] as a part of the Hong Kong Design Directory [7]. The Hong Kong Government also granted her a government fund called Design Incubation Programme [8] where the priority are given to companies that are market leaders (actual or potential) engage in design activities in their field [9]. She become one of the government funded incubatee [10] that shows she is well recognize. Coverage in English for Chailie Ho (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL) is more than the fashion designer Betty Charnuis(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL), who is already exist in wikipedia for more than a year[11], so Chailie Ho should not be delete. okojoj(talk) 05:05, 13 July 2010 This template must be substituted.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Low overall importance perhaps, but reasonably notable within a single subject which cannot be sourced traditionally. The fact that she's mentioned on so many international fashion blogs is indicative of a heightened level of recognition in the field. The interview in Papierdoll is a good English source. Just needs expansion. SteveStrummer (talk) 02:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per my comment above. The number, depth, and types of sources mentioned in this discussion do not convince me that she passes WP:BIO, and I haven't been able to find anything additional in English or Chinese. Furthermore, the Design Incubation Programme is not a selective award nor a recognition of past accomplishments --- it's just a way for people in certain industries to get government-subsidised office space in Kowloon Tong. cab (call) 00:19, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Except the US fashion website Papierdoll, there are other links about her such as the BBC China [12], Chinese fashion website YOKA [13] and FWTA official page[14]. There are also links about her in other languages such as Danish [15] and Japanese [16]. Her works have also been broadcasted in the FWTA TV programme where its coverage included Hong Kong, China and Asia Pacific countries. I can also find many people who is in fashion industry mentioned her in their blogs.


There is a total sum of HK$260,000(US$34,000) funding offer to each incubatee in the Design Incubation Program, while it is only offer to 30 funding receivers[17] in the Hong Kong design industry now, and only THREE of the funding receivers are in fashion design. This is obvious that the offers are very selective and the receivers must have outstanding reputations in their own field to receive the fund. I agree with SteveStrummer that she need further expansion, but I think she is well-recogonised in the field and definitely worth to keep. Kleeer (talk)