User talk:Patstuart

Orphaned non-free image (File:SCASDLogo.jpg)

You've uploaded File:SCASDLogo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:19, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Help!

Hello! I need your help, one year ago you talk to me about two photos loaded in Commons because they were pictures and you wanted to know the copyright. I explained you that they were pictures of my family and then everything was Ok. Now I would like to erase these pictures because I have loaded them again with another version. Could you help me? Thank you! The pictures to delete are: Antoni Roca Flaquer.jpg and Antoni Roca Várez.jpg, of fact I have added the delete tag but now I don't know what to do. --Garcia-Roca (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

An article you have edited, Colby's Clubhouse, is being considered for deletion

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colby's Clubhouse (2nd nomination) for more infomation. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 17:05, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Fotos borradas en Wikimedia commons

Hola Patstuart. Sé que llego tarde para hacer comentarios en defensa de dos fotos que fueron borradas a sugerencia tuya. Se trata de Image:JOSE_BUCHS.JPG y Image:CARME_VIANCE.jpg Se trata de dos actores antiguos espáñoles y las fotos fueron tomadas en la década de 1920. La razón para el borrado es que no se indica que la muerte del autor fuera anterior a 1938. El problema es que no se sabe quién es el autor (son anónimas) y fueron publicadas en España hace más de 80 años. Mi pregunta es si resulta de aplicación lo previsto en la Ley Española de Propiedad Intelectual [1], en cuyo artículo 27 se dice que, cuando el autor sea desconocido, los derechos duran 70 años desde la publicación, en este caso, de la fotografía. Lo pregunto sobre todo para saber qué hacer en el futuro con retratos anónimos de esa época. Gracias Cvbr, 17 de junio de 2009. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.9.211.6 (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Hawaii Theological Seminary

An article that you have been involved in editing, Hawaii Theological Seminary, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hawaii Theological Seminary. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ἀλήθεια 22:11, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ctrl-Alt-Del (band)

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ctrl-Alt-Del (band). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ctrl-Alt-Del (band) (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visiongain

A tag has been placed on Visiongain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 09:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Visiongain

The article Visiongain has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

tagged since February 2009 for having no references, has been edited almost exclusively by coi employees and notability has clearly not been established.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Teapotgeorge^Talk 16:35, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sharka Blue

The article Sharka Blue has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:PORNBIO and general notability guidelines. Reference search reveals only trivial coverage by .reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Morbidthoughts (talk) 18:05, 25 July 2010 (UTC)