User talk:68.43.233.110

To edit, please log in.

Editing by anonymous users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled. Registered users, however, are still able to edit. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, you may use this form to request a username. Alternatively, you may email us with your preferred username. Either way, use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. If using the form, please reference this block in the comment section.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

This IP address has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges.
Further abuse from this IP address may result in an extended block.

Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

Skipjack tuna

Thank you for your edits to skipjack tuna. However, adding a category for Hawaiian cuisine is unhelpful, since for consistency we would then have to add many dozens of other country cuisine categories, since tuna is eaten in many countries. Similarly, the statement that tuna is a kosher fish is unhelpful, since all true fish are kosher, and for consistency we would then have to add the statement to thousands of articles on true fish. I meant to remove the statement about kosher fish, not just revert it to the previous statement. (By the way, a phrase like "is felt to be" uses weasel words and should be avoided). I am not an administrator, and if I were, it would not mean that you would be any less likely to lose an argument, so long as your reasoning was sound. If you have an interest on kosher fish, you could start a separate article on the topic! --Geronimo20 (talk) 22:45, 17 July 2009 (UTC) ok[reply]

Philately

I see that you have made several edits to the philately page to change the definition. The existing definition is supported by the specialised philatelic dictionary cited and the difference, if any, between stamp collecting and philately have been widely debated on the talk pages both of philately and the philately project. If you do not agree with the consensus reached, then either of those pages is the place to take up the matter but until a new concensus is reached then I think the definitions should be left as they are. Thanks. Maidonian (talk) 12:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC) (P.S. Have you considered registering?)[reply]

As far as I can tell, "consensus" is reached on wikipedia by the last editor to touch the page, and how vigorously the zealot administrators defend the page. There is no "consensus" but rather who cares least losing the argument and who carries the stronger "twinkle" or other blocking tool.

Review the pages mentioned above. You will see a genuine debate has taken place on definitions over the years. Add your opinion! Register and apply to become an admin! Take part. Maidonian (talk) 13:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you agree with the "consensus" then you say it's a "debate." When you don't, then you call it an "editwar" or "vandalism." No thanks.

September 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Serena Williams. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Leuko (talk) 00:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Goat's milk cheese has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 21:53, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Subsidized housing, you will be blocked from editing. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:52, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2009

You have been blocked for a period of 55 hours from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:41, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. 98.248.32.44 (talk) 03:55, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Midwest hip hop has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 00:53, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Disgusting Tommy (msg) 00:12, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to Qatar. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. allen四names 00:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 week from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 00:25, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Myocardial infarction ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 13:32, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Vandalism

On review of your edits since coming off the previous block...

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Ian Cairns (talk) 14:04, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jim Leyland has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Mithrandir^Again (Talk!) 01:25, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at meme. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~Amatulić (talk) 06:04, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sin/Samech

I may have used the wrong s, but there was no sin before, and there isn't one now. The words in the intro page read "raphim" and "raph", not seraphim and seraph.CharlesMartel (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2010 (UTC)CharlesMartel[reply]

there was and is

No, there wasn't. It said, and you changed back to, רפים and רף. I'm not a fucking idiot; I can read Hebrew, and that says "raph" and "raphim", not seraph and seraphim. There was no sin. Also, sign your commentsCharlesMartel (talk) 14:02, 12 August 2010 (UTC)CharlesMartel[reply]

August 2010

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Seraph. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 22:13, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Seraph. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 22:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seraph

If you continue to have problems, you need to approach an administrator. But first try to resolve the issue through the Talk page. PiCo (talk) 22:34, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:38, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sinebot

Fuck you. In case you didn't know... If I don't sign... you take care of it for me...so take those tildes and shove them up your cyber ass mother fucker

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: User talk:SineBot. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 22:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 months for repeated abuse of editing privileges. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Nyttend (talk) 22:54, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

68.43.233.110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have discovered someone else's vandalism on the "Paul Krugman" page, but I am unable to reverse it because my I am blocked. I want to do good.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have discovered someone else's vandalism on the "Paul Krugman" page, but I am unable to reverse it because my I am blocked.  I want to do good. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have discovered someone else's vandalism on the "Paul Krugman" page, but I am unable to reverse it because my I am blocked.  I want to do good. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have discovered someone else's vandalism on the "Paul Krugman" page, but I am unable to reverse it because my I am blocked.  I want to do good. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.