Talk:X-Men (film series)
X-Men (film series) has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Film: American GA‑class | ||||||||||
|
Comics: Marvel GA‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||
|
Spin-off
Should we mention the Magneto and Wolverine spin-offs in more detail here? —Erik (talk • contrib) - 13:57, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Beast before X3
Wasn't there a cameo of the Dr. McCoy on TV (not Kelsey Grammar, obviously) in either the first or second film? Should that be included? As long as we have the Kitty Pryde cameos mentioned... —Erik (talk • contrib) - 14:39, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yep, Steven Basic played the part. Alientraveller 14:46, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Influences
In regard to the revert about the film's influences, I'm not sure why Variety should be questioned when it says, "Using several resources that include the Marvel Comics lore, along with the more recent Weapon X graphic novels by Frank Miller, Wolverine mixes action with an origin story about how Logan emerged from a barbaric experiment as an indestructible mutant with retractable razor-sharp claws." Is there something that overrides this? Scripts can change, you know. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 15:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm confused. Frank Miller's four part Wolverine story with Chris Claremont wasn't about Weapon X. Alientraveller 15:47, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, Wolverine is also known as Weapon X, so it's probably not explicitly about Wolverine's involvement with the program. I think that the recent influence should be mentioned, though, but re-worded to be vaguer and just point toward Frank Miller's work. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Variety may have confused Miller with Frank Tieri, who wrote the most recent Weapon X story, and Jackman said the film wasn't going to revolve around the Samurai backstory.[1] So I think we should leave it there. Alientraveller 16:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, Wolverine is also known as Weapon X, so it's probably not explicitly about Wolverine's involvement with the program. I think that the recent influence should be mentioned, though, but re-worded to be vaguer and just point toward Frank Miller's work. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:00, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, we'll see what new information surfaces. The headline and discussion are here to revisit if there's any more clarification down the road. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 16:09, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
Wizard Entertainment has some answers. "I’ve been reading Wolverine comics for 23 years," admitted the writer. And while he couldn’t discuss specific elements of his script, Benioff did hint at his favorite Wolvie stories. “I went back and reread the Chris Claremont and Frank Miller miniseries, and the Barry Windsor-Smith Weapon X." There's more information about the film at the link. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 18:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
- Cite is now there. Alientraveller 18:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
Good Article review
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b lack of images (does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
This article could do with a few more images, but other than that it seems to me to meet the good article criteria. --HughCharlesParker (talk - contribs) 23:40, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, images would be tough for a film series article... a lot of the information is broad. Maybe we could make a line graph of the first 10 weeks of the box office performance of the X-Men films. :) —Erik (talk • contrib) - 23:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Cast members interested in returning
I'll incorporate these once I have time. Alientraveller 21:25, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I've had problems installing Flash (it works on some sites), so could someone watch this Ellen Page interview? I'd sent in a question asking if she'd reprise the role of Kitty. [6] Alientraveller (talk) 16:55, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- No mention of Kitty, it was mainly all to do with Juno. Sorry. Paul 730 17:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Alientraveller (talk) 17:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
Cudmore in X1?
I know Colossus has a cameo in X1, he can be seen sketching in the court yard of the X-Mansion. However, are we sure that it's Daniel Cudmore who plays him? I can't remember even seeing his face. IMDb doesn't list anyone as playing Colossus, so are we sure he was even credited? Paul730 22:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
young wolverine
An actor has already been chosen to play young Logan. http://www.superherohype.com/news.php?id=6445 Franshu 21:58, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Wolverine
Couldn't that section be remade into another article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.6.125.46 (talk • contribs)
- Hi; as per the notability guidelines for films, it shouldn't have its own article until such time as filming begins. Due to the unpredictable nature of the film business, a project may be delayed or end up canceled altogether, even a high-profile project such as this one. So we find it best not to create the article for said film until we know it's almost certain to reach completion (i.e. when the cameras finally roll). Best regards, Steve T • C 09:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
For The Love Of God Create an X-men Origins:Wolverine Article...You Have Enough Info For A Full Article About The Movie... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.28.91 (talk) 16:15, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- Again, not until it starts filming, per WP:FUTFILMS. I'm not bothered though to start paragraphing the mini-article now though, as it starts this month. Alientraveller (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
- I concur with Alientraveller. A full article about a film would include the plot, the cast, the production, and various aspects of its release such as box office performance and critical reaction. Considering the delays of superhero films such as Justice League of America and the Superman Returns sequel as well as other major projects especially due to the writers' strike, Wolverine still has not crossed the threshold into production. The threshold exists because the entry into production cannot be guaranteed at all until it actually begins. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 20:11, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
The info about Liev being cast as Stryker is speculative. Some sites are reporting that he will be Sabretooth and Michael C Hall (Dexter) will be young stryker. MikeSims (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- No it's not, CHUD is just a rumourmill. Alientraveller (talk) 20:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Cast section in future
Is there anyone we might want to leave out for this article in future? The Wolverine cast has its own unique set of mutants, I'm not so sure how many to include, or for that matter how many mutants to include from the previous films. A controversial idea I have is to leave out mutants who only appeared once. Alientraveller (talk) 16:48, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- I'd agree with the one-time appearances being taken out, but it may be better to move it and make a small paragraph about them. That's if nothings been done yet. Just realised when you wrote this. -- Harish - 15:38, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
Magneto script reviews
[7] I'm placing these here for safekeeping. When the film is in production and final plot details emerge, these can be implemented to show how things changed. Alientraveller (talk) 10:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review of Goyer's rewrite. Alientraveller (talk) 18:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Shouldn't Generation X also be included in this list?
It is also an X-men film, no? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.217.11.183 (talk) 08:37, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
- A failed television pilot: but there's a good quote from Arad about it in a book, so I will add that. Alientraveller (talk) 11:28, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Budget
Anyone wanna add budget to the table in # 3.1 Box office performance. Would be good.IAmTheCoinMan (talk) 04:07, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
X-Men Origins: Deadpool confirmed.
http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/theampersand/archive/2009/05/06/x-men-origins-deadpool-confirmed.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.33.138.221 (talk) 04:15, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
- The article has mentioned for over a year now the studio's interest in his own film. Alientraveller (talk) 19:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Hopefully they don't screw it up like they did in Wolverine. 98.31.7.138 (talk) 15:28, 8 May 2009 (UTC)EF
- Okay, I'm just curious about this. I know they've confirmed the Deadpool spinoff but has it been confirmed as X-Men Origins: Deadpool? I know I'm probably just being obsessive or maybe even anal retentive but I'm just curious. ONEder Boy (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- 1) To the IP, WP:TALK. 2) ONEder Boy, I've removed the section header since all that is known about the project is appropriately mentioned in the Wolverine section is that the studio would like a spin-off for Reynolds. If something more concrete like a director/writer came up, it could easily go under a Deadpool header. Alientraveller (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Someone looking up information on the Deadpool project and turning to Wikipedia would not know to find information about it in the subsection of a different movie. We may not have much information on the Deadpool movie (thus explaining why it doesn't have its own article) but with it being announced it CERTAINLY deserves it's own section --206.170.91.220 (talk) 00:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Put the Gambit and Deadpool sentence in its own section. :) Alientraveller (talk) 00:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Gambit's a different matter. We have no information about a spinoff being in the works for him, while there's article after article after article out there put forward in the past couple days about the next Deadpool movie being on the way. Gambit's future was just idle theorizing. --206.170.91.220 (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- IMO, they're just as likely as each other: the studio may reiterate its interest but neither of them have a script or director. Anyway, I'll leave you to take care of it. Alientraveller (talk) 10:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Gambit's a different matter. We have no information about a spinoff being in the works for him, while there's article after article after article out there put forward in the past couple days about the next Deadpool movie being on the way. Gambit's future was just idle theorizing. --206.170.91.220 (talk) 00:08, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Put the Gambit and Deadpool sentence in its own section. :) Alientraveller (talk) 00:07, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- Someone looking up information on the Deadpool project and turning to Wikipedia would not know to find information about it in the subsection of a different movie. We may not have much information on the Deadpool movie (thus explaining why it doesn't have its own article) but with it being announced it CERTAINLY deserves it's own section --206.170.91.220 (talk) 00:05, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
- 1) To the IP, WP:TALK. 2) ONEder Boy, I've removed the section header since all that is known about the project is appropriately mentioned in the Wolverine section is that the studio would like a spin-off for Reynolds. If something more concrete like a director/writer came up, it could easily go under a Deadpool header. Alientraveller (talk) 00:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
They're not just as likely as each other. Deadpool has been officially confirmed and Ryan Renolds has signed a contract to reprise his role as Wade Wilson/Deapool. At this point in time a Gambit movie is just wishfull thinking on the part of the producers. The prior can also be said for the Wolverine sequal, it's been officially confirmed, Hugh Jackman is signed on, so it requires it's own section, regardless of weather or not it's been mentioned in a diffrent article. 86.150.144.20 (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
- They're all wishful thinking on the producers' part. ;) Alientraveller (talk) 21:40, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Not when contracts have been signed. 86.150.144.20 (talk) 07:11, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah dude, only Deadpool has been confimed, the Cajun would be cool in a film, but this is just our hopes, Deadpool is almost definetly going to get his own film, while Gambit may not, if we're lucky he might appear in any upcoming X-films & in the future maybe his own, Heck if I could I'd write the Script myself, I'd do it For the Deadpool film too, but that's allready got a script in early development, just hope they keep it comedic & not a 'family' film where they have a comedic character, then ruin it by putting a really serious ending, like Marly & Me, or the Wrestler. --The One & Only (talk) 14:32, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Too much infobox content
I just removed the Producer, Writer, Music, Cinematography, and Editing fields from the infobox. Why? Because there was a massive amount of information in there, and it caused the infobox to spill over onto the Recurring Characters table[8]. That information is important, yes, but only for the individual movies themselves; when covering the series, we need to restrict it to just the most common elements (such as the stars) or the most important (such as the directors). EVula // talk // ☯ // 15:07, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
X-Men 4
Why does X-Men 4 redirect to the Wolverine movie? shouldn't it redirect here? since the Wolverine movie was a spin off. --Gman124 talk 22:42, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Deadpool will mouth off?
Why does it say that Ryan Renolds will "regain the ability to mouth off" in Deadpool? Did RR want to mouth off and they didn't let him? Did the character mouth off in the beginning of Wolverine and something happened to stop him from mouthing off? Does Deadpool mouth off in the comics but not in Wolverine? Anyway, it's a weird sentence with an ambiguous phrase that someone who knows more than me should fix. Thanks. Kansaikiwi (talk) 13:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
- In Wolverine, Deadpool's mouth is stitched up by Stryker to shut him up, so in the new film he will have this undone & get the ability to mouth off again, any way that doesn't matter, what happened to the section about Deadpool's film? it's gone, has someone thought it would be funny? It was smat? or some idiot thought that it was a rumour? someone re place it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Captcrash182 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
fox's x-men rights
the lead says that fox got the right in 1994. but for how long did they get it for? also since disney owns marvel now and they want to do it with their own studios after deals expire would that mean that they might restart the franchise? should those things be included here too? Gman124 talk 17:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Merging Magneto with First Class
I think it's safe to say that the Magneto spin-off will never get made, and elements from that script are being merged into the First Class storyline, given Singer's comments in that Los Angeles Times interview. Should we just merge the two sections together? Wildroot Improved (talk) 17:13, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Sandbox for X-Men: First Class film
I have created an sandbox for the X-Men: First Class film here for future use. You are welcome to edit and expand on it if you like. Thank you! Jhenderson777 (talk) 18:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
It's perfect! It's time to put it online. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.51.42.87 (talk) 20:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Not yet! An article about the film can't come out until it starts filming. But thank you! Jhenderson777 (talk) 22:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
First Class Filming
Lauren Shuler Donner said that First Class would begin filming in August here. Does this mean the First Class article can be created on the 1st of September--121.217.213.95 (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
- Wikipedia good articles
- Good articles without topic parameter
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- GA-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class Marvel Comics articles
- Marvel Comics work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles