User talk:69.181.249.92

Note to self: Things to tackle

sar

This user is obviously not sarcastic.

THIS IP USER HAS BEEN REQUESTED WAY TOO MANY TIMES TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT!

Other notes

Hanlon's razor. Kuru (talk) 11:50, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Technopat (talk) 00:11, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping with vandalism

You should consider creating a (free) account, we'd love to have you around in the community. — CIS ^(talk | stalk) 19:28, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But I'm already a part of the community, just one without a registered account.

69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But rollback is useful for vandal zapping :P NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 05:42, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to review User talk:76.117.247.55 and its archives. — $Jeff G. ツ$ 19:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wow!

Greetings! It really looks like you've been stepping on people's toes lately... or are they all mad 'cos their team's not a finalist and they ain't got nuffin' better to do? Not even help clean up... Just a quick word of support - in the face of so much whatever-their-reasons-are - to the receiver of all their ire: Don't let 'em get to you! Cheers! --Technopat (talk) 00:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... I'd say it's a bit of both. I do tend to draw a bit of ire from those who think that every suggestion is law (even when they're contradictory). Always nice to hear from you, and thanks for the support. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:03, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are a cool IP editor...

		The Original Barnstar
		... and if you do not want to get a username then no one should bother you about it. Thanks for your recent changes patrolling! Blue Rasberry 03:59, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Human Sexuality Barnstar
		A highly inappropriate barnstar prompted, on the one hand, by your moniker, on the other, by your positive contributions. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 23:15, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the talk page stalking

I find the exchanges you get into amusing. Keep up the good work, homie. Millahnna (mouse)talk 16:34, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a prob - stalk away. Others opinions are welcome. Most experienced editors realize that my edits are usually valid ones. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 16:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you ever do create an account, drop me a line so I know who you are. But I might still call you 69. It tickles me. Millahnna (mouse)talk 22:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Many people, myself included, are amused by it. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:50, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As in 69-one ate one? lol My76 Strat 03:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See, it works on so many levels.

You hereby win the laugh-of-the-day award (which I swear I'll get around to creating soon). 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:21, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Creating an account

I see that you fight vandalism on here using an IP address, but having an account is will make it much easier for you as you'll easily get Rollback (which means you can undo vandalism with one click and at a faster rate), Wikipedia:Twinkle will also make your life easier as when you activate it, all the tags (like speedy deletion, afd, and all their specifics are at the top of you wikipedia bar) and now with the new pending protection, you can become a Wikipedia:Reviewer which means you can help make sure those pages are protected which you can't if you don't have reviewer privileges. You can get all this right away as you have good track record. Tell me if you're interested. --Everyone Dies In the End (talk) 21:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oooh, that's a very tempting offer. Let me think about it. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:51, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Presuming that's not sarcasm, I'd be happy to make the changes to your permissions if you create an account. Personally, though, I think it's more fun watching you get molested by random bots every day. :) Kuru (talk) 22:59, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, no, it wasn't sarcasm, and what you wrote is just mean!

69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. BTW, I have thought up some really cool user names and I'll be glad to share (I have three already, haha). Drmies (talk) 00:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you really should consider making an account. See Wikipedia:Why create an account? for more details. I must point out that IP addresses may periodically change, which means you could lose all of your edits. For a username, I would suggest using the text in the captcha ;-) Happy editing! Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 23:32, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been doing this for years and have "lost" more edits than most editors will ever have. I don't keep score, so it that aspect bothers me not at all. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:35, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Wikipedia appreciates IP editors as well as logged-in editors, so stay anonymous if you wish! :) Best of luck, Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 23:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. As you can see, I've got lots of encouragement to do so. Hmmm.... I wonder if I could register as User:Editor 69.181.249.92? 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:47, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No idea. As I stated, the captcha text sometimes gives good ideas for a username. And really, you could be an admin already if all of your edits were to be consolidated together... Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 19:05, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOL I doubt it. I don't have the temperment, the inclination or the patience. Although, considering some of the rogue admins around here, perhaps I could be... 69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So, you gonna get an account? :) Ocean Shores (Formerly TEK) 00:22, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to withdraw my suggestion to create an account.

THIS IP USER HAS BEEN REQUESTED WAY TOO MANY TIMES TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT!

But you already did. Anyhow, what do you think of this template? Sorry for sounding picky. mechamind 9 0 00:21, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion reminder.

When tagging an article for any type of deletion unless it's pure vandalism, it is extremely important to post a {{db-notice}} on their talk page.

In your most recent case, it would be {{subst:db-bio-notice}} as an article about a person that doesn't indicate the significance. Remember not to include the tt or nowiki arguments inside it. mechamind 9 0 23:49, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mechamind, thanks, but I think 69 knows that; they've been around the block. How are you doing, 69? There's a party at my house tonight, and there will be a ton of beer. If you want to quit Wiki early tonight, c'mon by. Drmies (talk) 23:59, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Count me in! 69.181.249.92 (talk) 00:13, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and Mechamind, I haven't yet thanked you for the box in a previous thread. Thank you! 69.181.249.92 (talk) 17:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! mechamind 9 0 23:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note, though. I do insist after tagging a page for CSD that you go to the creator's talk page and post {{subst:db-a7-notice|Article name}} or something similar. Just the right thing to do...even though their article will likely be deleted anyway. mechamind 9 0 23:10, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insist away, but it's not going to do any good. I've been through this discussion many times under many different IP addresses and it always boils down to "it's recommended but not required." Even been to ANI once or twice... 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:12, 22 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then.

And I think the IP address should be allowed to be manually confirmed to move and edit semi-protected pages. You're pretty well established similar to an individual person anyhow. I'm pretty sure some administrators would approve. mechamind 9 0 01:27, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar Awarded!

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Great job reverting vandalism and helping Wikipedia stay spam and vandal free. Látches ^{Lets talk!} 20:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! (Much more of this and I will have to register an account, although I'll mourn the loss of my IP status.) 69.181.249.92 (talk) 20:33, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Flag of Punishment

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Flag of Punishment, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Flag of Punishment. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Drmies (talk) 02:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! Any chance you'll roll in the other articles about this band's songs/albums, since none of them meet criteria? <hint, hint, wink> 69.181.249.92 (talk) 02:30, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have my blessing to add them--you know better than I how to do that! If only you had an account... Drmies (talk) 02:32, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thiiiiis close to getting one, then I run across comments like this and realize there's still a reason to stay an IP. Damn my allegience to the underdog! 69.181.249.92 (talk) 02:37, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You, IP vandal, have been blocked for continuing attempts to stick it to the man. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drmies (talk • contribs)

ME! I'm the man!lulz :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 02:50, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, who else would like me to stick it to 'em? I'll start off gentle if you need me to... 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:00, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You got off scant lucky. Jimbo Wales was blocked for one second for disruptive ANing. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

{For the record, and all kidding aside, I wasn't blocked - check the logs if you have any doubts.) 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR

If you do not self revert yourself at the Mariam article, I will be reporting you for violating WP:3RR. Egypt maintains a blockade on the Gaza Strip. 174.112.83.21 (talk) 04:17, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free. Your constant adding of an improper and blatantly false tag could be construed as vandalism, and I'd welcome the chance for an admin to see that. Besides, it's rather moot now that other refs have been added. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Egypt blockades Gaza. It is far from moot. See you at the noticeboard. 174.112.83.21 (talk) 04:22, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ooo, this could be good. (gets popcorn)--intelati 04:23, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would call that incorrect tagging vandamalistic--or at the least disruptive. I'll be next to intelati, with a couple of (good) beers. Drmies (talk) 04:26, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One a hour Drmies.--intelati 04:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I hate edit conflicts with you, 69, and I was really proud of my edit summary. Drmies (talk) 04:28, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do share. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

intelati has bought you a pint! Sharing a pint is a great way to bond with other editors after a day of hard work. Spread the WikiLove by buying someone else a pint, whether it be someone with whom you have collaborated or had disagreements. Cheers!

Spread the good cheer and camaraderie by adding {{subst:WikiPint}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

—Preceding unsigned comment added by Intelati (talk • contribs) 04:31, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, you saved me a trip to the fridge. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

not only did you violate 3RR before my warning with 4 reverts, but you made a 5th revert after my warning. [1] 174.112.83.21 (talk) 04:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Because you, once again, introduced blatently false information. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"was it blatently false? blatent? really? you are mistaken. 174.112.83.21 (talk) 04:39, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I find it extremely funny how two established editors decided that fighting with regular accounts isn't enough and that fighting as IP editors was nobler. (Oh, I didn't see the thread above. My statement didn't apply to you.) :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 04:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, the popcorn's stale, the beer's flat and warm, and still no resolution by admins. I guess that speaks to the quality of the complaint when none of them want to touch it. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 22:14, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stalemate. My least favorite ending--intelati 00:13, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now Playing

"3RR: the battle of the IPs"

rated R for excessive reverting

--intelati 05:35, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And one of the most boring interludes in recent history. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 05:36, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Made me laugh. I'm easy apparently. Wait... what? Millahnna (mouse)talk 05:55, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Final resolution - the complaint was archived after 48 hours with no admin action. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 09:09, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reverting by both IPs still had more dignity than the WWE No Mercy edit war by registered users...over a hyphen. mechamind 9 0 18:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, you definitely win the laugh of the day award (which I have yet to get around to creating) for pointing me towards that page. On the other hand, I was rather disappointed to discover that none of my various... interactions have made that page yet. I guess I'll just have to try harder... 69.181.249.92 (talk) 18:59, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant

This is a brilliant edit summary Shadowjams (talk) 09:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's one of my favorites. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ontario Crafts Council

Hello,

Thank you for contributing to the article I've been working on for the Ontario Crafts Council. I am new to Wikipedia so I really appreciate the input of individuals who are more familiar with Wikipedia standards.

I'm not sure why you removed the list I posted of "Notable Members." The Saidye Bronfman Award is a Governor General's Award, which is one of the highest honours you can receive in Canada. If you do not believe that this constitutes noteworhtiness, please tell me your reasoning, so I can further consider whether it is worthwhile to include.

As for the list of leading academics and professors, I can understand that their names may only have resonance with members of the Ontario craft community. Thanks for bringing this to my attention - I will have to think further about it.

Cheers. Amcawa (talk) 16:20, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In general, an indiscriminate lists are to be avoided, hence my removal of a few of them from this article (previous locations, etc.). The names are usually only considered worth inclusion if 1)they are essential to an understanding of the subject and 2) they are noteworthy in and of themselves. I didn't see either of those in the list. It seemd more an attempt to bolster the notability of the OCC by saying "these people won this award and they're members so OCC must be important," a form of bolstering the credentials of OCC by association. It would be like listing the membership of the Screen Actors Guild members who have won Oscars as a means of demonstrating the notability of SAG.69.181.249.92 (talk) 20:46, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I'm linking to pages which would not be notable on this encyclopedia. All of the links are informative and sourced. Greedlook (talk) 18:32, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

They fail the external links guidelines and they are not linked to a reliable source. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are thousands of links to Wikia and other wikis! Why can't you just accept the fact that when those red links will be filled, they will be deleted a second later as not notable pages? Greedlook (talk) 18:34, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS is a very poor reason to create more crap. If the names aren't notable enough for their own article, then they don't belong in the list to begin with. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 18:36, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly incorrect image licensing

Which tag should be used when the licensing of a particular image is in doubt? I'm specifically thinking of File:Tatyana Petsa's foto.jpg, but it's an issue I run across frequently enough that I should know how to deal with it. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On Commons, that's {{subst:npd}} for missing permission. subst:nld for no license, subst:nsd for no source. —fetch ·comms 03:07, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image, as it currently stands, doesn't "exist" per se. It's an extension of the one already at commons, so there's currently "nothing" there. If you want to tag it, you'll have to go to the page at commons. :| TelCo NaSp Ve :| 03:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In that specific case, I think it should be deleted; if it is from a magazine, it is highly likely to be non-free, which is not permitted on Commons.

In general, if in doubt, ask on WP:MCQ. Chzz ► 04:12, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, an answer I can finally comprehend. Did I mention that I really hate image licensing/permission issues? 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate for AFD

{for all of my watchers, some ideas to spark your creativity)

Todd Wolfe - Prod removed, primary sources only, dubious notability

List of Transformers spacecraft

I am warning you to stop edit warring. Please read WP:3RR and do not continue to replace the "unreferenced" tag to the article List of Transformers spacecraft. This article is a list of other Wikipedia articles, and (like a disambiguation page) does not require references. Inniverse (talk) 11:35, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) It's a bit early to say edit warring when he's only made two edits to the entire history of the article. Ged UK 11:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletions

Please be aware that there is no policy that prevents anyone, even an article creator, from removing a proposed deletion template. PROD is not the same as speedy deletion. If you still believe the article must be deleted after the removal of a PROD template, then that simply means an AfD is to be initiated. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 13:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SnottyWong ^gossip 16:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC) [reply]

FYI

RE: For future reference, we have these. Could come in handy. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 20:13, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you, I wasn't aware of that one. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 20:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You Bar Bum!

You might be interested in this. BTW, thanks for the help. Drmies (talk) 01:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

reidrect

Like I said, I think that is premature. Dloh cierekim 14:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts.

If possible, could you post links to each time I've reverted you? I'd like to go over them and try to remember what the reason was for reverting you. Thanks in advance! - Donald Duck (talk) 03:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xilinx ISE AfD

Someone came up with sources that could save the article. Yours is the only outstanding delete !vote that prevents me from withdrawing the nomination. Could you take a look at it? -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 04:30, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up!!

Well thanks for being respectful and nice to me on my talk page, anyway when you refer too conflicticted of your neutral point of view, are you reffering my changes and edits as a good thing???? I see what you mean though, you want me to backup my changes with resources. well it's fairly hard to get resources on a older song with the band having No websites nor much information about there songs. I also understand what you mean by people possibly disagreeing with the genres i put, well that matter i hope someone will discuss on my talk page so we can come up with a fair way to fix it. and nice profile!! especially from a non registered user, you should really make a registered account :). MajorHawke (talk) 05:43, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

THIS IP USER HAS BEEN REQUESTED WAY TOO MANY TIMES TO CREATE AN ACCOUNT!

Thanks

Thanks for reverting that comment on my talk page. Another admin blocked the account. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, somebody beat me to the UAA page. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 06:45, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings

It may not have been your intention, but you did not warn the creator of the GAM-Great American Market article of the pending SD. The template to do so can be found on the SD notice on the page. Thanks, Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:15, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See User_talk:69.181.249.92#Deletion_reminder. above. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 00:17, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. Did not see that. At any rate, continue the good work. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob, you're not expected to read my entire talk page. Sometimes, I don't even bother.

69.181.249.92 (talk) 00:22, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Meniscus Film Festival

Just a quick note to let you know that I removed the speedy deletion template you placed on Meniscus Film Festival because the article did not seem to meet the speedy deletion criterion A7. The subject is a real-world cultural event which has verifiable press coverage

Please be aware that is normally inappropriate re-add a speedy deletion template when another editor (other than the creator of the article) has removed it, because speedy deletion is only for uncontroversial deletions. If you believe the article still needs to be deleted, please consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD which can be used for deletions which are not covered by the speedy deletion criteria.

I am not an administrator and I do not have any special authority in this matter. If you feel that I have made a mistake, please feel free to contact me on my talk page.

Thparkth (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

sorry bud, thought i had your IP whitelisted, no harm intended. cheers WookieInHeat (talk) 01:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at what it did to the freakin' article before you go around misusing Huggle. Godz, I hate that tool. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 01:29, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another great IP

Your tagging of those two shock foam articles put me in cardiac arrest for a moment. Thanks for helping to cut down on pages that satisfy the CSD guidelines. Buggie111 (talk) 03:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No prob. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:59, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chloé Charody

Hi there! Just to let you know: I've changed your BLPPROD for a standard PROD. There were already links in the article that concerned the subject. It'll probably get deleted anyway as it has a big COI.--Kudpung (talk) 04:21, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are no references, so a BLPPROD is appropriate. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 04:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

stop

dont edit war me. u win this time but next time me not gonn a give in i will report you

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.