User talk:Republic of Texas

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing, including threats of outing, attempts to intimidate other editors, racist and homophobic rants, and more.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

In short: You had your lulz. Now go do something else, somewhere else. — Coren ^(talk) 11:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Republic of Texas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Wow, thanks for the due process and opportunity to make my case - not! Just curious, is there any rule regarding the creation of new accounts while this block is in effect? I have access to many thousands of new IP addresses, so I suppose it could be done fairly easily. I could not find any rule against it, but I just wanted to make sure, as I wish to continue productively contributing to Wikipedia now and in the future. Since you unilaterally decided upon this block without even giving me an opportunity to be heard it does not seem fair to me. I don't know what you mean by 'threats of outing' since I have no clue as to whether or not someone that edits here is a homosexual with a secret to hide (never even crossed my mind). 'Attempts to intimidate other editors', not sure what you mean there, either. I never said anything about kicking someone's ass, or that I would use a NSL to get their home address from their ISP, or anything even remotely similar. In fact, I made no threats against any editor. But, whatever. Since you decided the matter without giving me the benefit of responding I guess this was a really fair process.

In any event, I could find no rule against the creation of another account (at least doing so would keep that weird stalker dude away). If that is against the rules, please let me know and show me. Republic of Texas (talk) 17:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=:Wow, thanks for the due process and opportunity to make my case - not!  Just curious, is there any rule regarding the creation of new accounts while this block is in effect?  I have access to many thousands of new IP addresses, so I suppose it could be done fairly easily.  I could not find any rule against it, but I just wanted to make sure, as I wish to continue productively contributing to Wikipedia now and in the future.  Since you unilaterally decided upon this block without even giving me an opportunity to be heard it does not seem fair to me.  I don't know what you mean by 'threats of outing' since I have no clue as to whether or not someone that edits here is a homosexual with a secret to hide (never even crossed my mind).  'Attempts to intimidate other editors', not sure what you mean there, either.  I never said anything about kicking someone's ass, or that I would use a NSL to get their home address from their ISP, or anything even remotely similar.  In fact, I made no threats against any editor.  But, whatever.  Since you decided the matter without giving me the benefit of responding I guess this was a really fair process.

:In any event, I could find no rule against the creation of another account (at least doing so would keep that weird stalker dude away).  If that is against the rules, please let me know and show me. [[User:Republic of Texas|Republic of Texas]] ([[User talk:Republic of Texas#top|talk]]) 17:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 
 |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=:Wow, thanks for the due process and opportunity to make my case - not!  Just curious, is there any rule regarding the creation of new accounts while this block is in effect?  I have access to many thousands of new IP addresses, so I suppose it could be done fairly easily.  I could not find any rule against it, but I just wanted to make sure, as I wish to continue productively contributing to Wikipedia now and in the future.  Since you unilaterally decided upon this block without even giving me an opportunity to be heard it does not seem fair to me.  I don't know what you mean by 'threats of outing' since I have no clue as to whether or not someone that edits here is a homosexual with a secret to hide (never even crossed my mind).  'Attempts to intimidate other editors', not sure what you mean there, either.  I never said anything about kicking someone's ass, or that I would use a NSL to get their home address from their ISP, or anything even remotely similar.  In fact, I made no threats against any editor.  But, whatever.  Since you decided the matter without giving me the benefit of responding I guess this was a really fair process.

:In any event, I could find no rule against the creation of another account (at least doing so would keep that weird stalker dude away).  If that is against the rules, please let me know and show me. [[User:Republic of Texas|Republic of Texas]] ([[User talk:Republic of Texas#top|talk]]) 17:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 
 |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=:Wow, thanks for the due process and opportunity to make my case - not!  Just curious, is there any rule regarding the creation of new accounts while this block is in effect?  I have access to many thousands of new IP addresses, so I suppose it could be done fairly easily.  I could not find any rule against it, but I just wanted to make sure, as I wish to continue productively contributing to Wikipedia now and in the future.  Since you unilaterally decided upon this block without even giving me an opportunity to be heard it does not seem fair to me.  I don't know what you mean by 'threats of outing' since I have no clue as to whether or not someone that edits here is a homosexual with a secret to hide (never even crossed my mind).  'Attempts to intimidate other editors', not sure what you mean there, either.  I never said anything about kicking someone's ass, or that I would use a NSL to get their home address from their ISP, or anything even remotely similar.  In fact, I made no threats against any editor.  But, whatever.  Since you decided the matter without giving me the benefit of responding I guess this was a really fair process.

:In any event, I could find no rule against the creation of another account (at least doing so would keep that weird stalker dude away).  If that is against the rules, please let me know and show me. [[User:Republic of Texas|Republic of Texas]] ([[User talk:Republic of Texas#top|talk]]) 17:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC) 
 |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}