Talk:Bonnie Nettles

Biography Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	An appropriate infobox may need to be added to this article. Please refer to the list of biography infoboxes for further information.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Religion: New religious movements Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Full name in published source

In John Grant's A Directory Of Discarded Ideas, Ashgrove Press, 1981 (ISBN 0552990132), Bonnie's full name is given as "Bonnie Lu Trousdale Nettles" along with the comment that Marshall Herff Applewhite and Bonnie are (in 1981) "also known as Bo and Peep". Dajwilkinson (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notable?

Is Bonnie Nettles actually notable on her own? As far as I can tell there's nothing in this article that isn't covered in either Marshall Applewhite's article or the Heaven's Gate one (except her DOB). My reading of WP:BIO is that this article should be merged to one of the above. Anyone agree or disagree? -- Bobyllib (talk) 00:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That was my impression as well, I tagged it as non-notable. Perhaps someone will add some sourced info which points to her notability. Otherwise I might prod or nominate it for deletion. Wolfview (talk) 12:12, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]