Jump to content

User talk:24.189.168.173

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.189.168.173 (talk) at 23:51, 24 September 2010 (→List of my enemies). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

May 2010

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

You are welcome to continue editing articles without logging in, but I highly recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (24.189.168.173) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome!

Acps110 (talk • contribs) 16:07, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 03:39, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Messages

Hello, 24.189.168.173. You have new messages at Talk:N (New York City Subway service)#Broadway line north of Canal Street.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acps110 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Careful...

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on N (New York City Subway service). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 22:34, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Kudpung (talk) 22:51, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding Disruptive editing. The thread is Disruptive editing by 24.189.168.173. Thank you. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. bodnotbod (talk) 23:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page V (New York City Subway service). Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Coasterlover1994 00:02, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re: A (New York City Subway service)

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to A (New York City Subway service). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 00:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 22:29, 11 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be having trouble understanding why you are being reverted when you add the phrase "all local stops" to articles such as the R train and V train. Those trains do stop at all local stops, but they also stop at all express stops too. All local stops implies that they skip express stops. Please stop and leave it at all stops. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 22:58, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And he still doesn't.--IGeMiNix (talk) 19:10, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on R (New York City Subway service). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 21:30, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Your edits are reverted because all stops means local and express too, also changing making all stops to running local just means you want to edit because you can, not because you are adding info. If you claim to know things, then just leave most pages the way they are and ONLY add things that are necessary, not just to edit because you like it, this is not your site. Also, don't leave notes on a page, it is vandalism.--IGeMiNix (talk) 23:40, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 57th Street (BMT Broadway Line). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to 57th Street (BMT Broadway Line), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.


Perhaps you should read this. It is a good overview on what Wikipedia is about. You have been here about three months and are not getting it yet. You are frustrating a bunch of editors here. While no editor is more important than another, your conduct leaves much to be desired. Please learn more about what Wikipedia is about as well as what it is not. You obviously have a passion for the New York City Subway and could be a great editor here. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 13:48, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is one thing to ignore your own talk page,

But vandalism a page is really going to get you blocked.--IGeMiNix (talk) 04:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to 5 (New York City Subway service), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jmlk17 01:43, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to BMT_Fourth_Avenue_Line, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. IGeMiNix (talk) 15:28, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No Personal attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Talk:N (New York City Subway service)#From McCrillis Nsiah to the MTA. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 04:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. SECOND request to use edit summaries. You have not made a single on since the last request. Kudpung (talk) 08:25, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page 3 (New York City Subway service) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Diego Grez (talk) 03:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively here, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did with this edit to Talk:BMT Broadway Line. You may wish to read the introduction to editing for more information about Wikipedia. Thank you. Qwyrxian (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 24.189.168.173. You have new messages at Talk:G (New York City Subway service).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Acps110 (talk • contribs) 14:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at WP:ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your disruption of pages pertaining to the New York City Subway system. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Disruption by 24.189.168.173. Thank you. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —DoRD (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z8

  • Listen, you cannot continue to make edits such as this one if you want to edit here. You need to slow down and listen to what other editors are telling you and stop becoming so angry when they correct your edits. If this behavior continues after your block expires, you can expect a much longer block next time. —DoRD (talk) 16:40, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome. Usertalk:24.189.168.173 6:45 p.m., September 4, 2010

If you don't like being blocked, you really shouldn't be making edits like this one, and I suggest that you go remove it ASAP. Editors here are expected to behave politely towards one another and edits like that one will earn you another longer block. We want all editors to feel welcome here, but we cannot allow people to attack one another. I'm sorry if you are unhappy with the recent block, but unless your behavior improves right now it will not be your last one.
For the time being, perhaps you would be more comfortable editing one of the many wikis at Wikia.com where often the rules are not so strict as we have here. —DoRD (talk) 23:10, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I only edit stuff thats nesscary. I'm sorry for the rude behavior. I don't want to expact a much longer block the next time. I like Wikipedia. I will never edit stuff until I come up with a nesscary sentence. I seem to think that I edit stuff cuz i feel like it, I don't. And can you talk to Acps110 and IGeMiNix about what I said. I have read one of their talking pages, saying that I edit here cuz I can. I have a passion with the MTA's NYCS in U.S. I know they are still enemies with me but its okay I can enjoy it. But when it is the day we get along, I'm happy to make new friends.

Usertalk:24.189.168.173 7:23 p.m., September 4, 2010

You gotta learn to read,

but until February 22, 2004, when the north tracks reopened, the N was local and the now defunct W was express.

Which means service before 2/22/04, when it says until, it is talking about the service before it. Also you gotta choose whether you want running local along its entire route or making all stops because both are fine but they aren't really worth editing over. --IGeMiNix (talk) 23:49, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. So It means It's talking about service before it. Now I see. So the W run express and the N run local from 7/21/01 to 2/24/04, I ethier choose making all stops or running local along its entire route. Usertalk:24.189.168.173 7:59 p.m., September 4, 2010

Yeah, just choose one and stick with that one, because really it isn't really needed to change what you put before which is fine but just be consistent and stick with one.--IGeMiNix (talk) 00:07, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also with 57th St, please don't change it, when you put all, it changes the meaning as there are weekday N and Q trains that terminate on the express tracks on weekdays. The point of the current wording is to give a general idea of the service that is being provided there.--IGeMiNix (talk) 00:09, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you, I won't change the 57th St page on Broadway line (N, Q, R lines). Usertalk:24.189.168.173 8:11 p.m., September 4, 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to IRT White Plains Road Line. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.   — Jeff G.  ツ 01:16, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yo about the G, it is N/A because it is like the L as there is only 2 tracks and there is no local and express tracks. --IGeMiNix (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You and Accp10 must understand, the MTA made the L train as the L Canarsie Local and the G is G Brooklyn-Queens Crosstown Local. o.o And plus, if a line has like 6-7 or more stations it is considered being a local train. Same thing I told Accp10 after the editor yelled at me. Please also understand this, if a line has two tracks for one service train or 2-3, I read the L train page. It says All trains are local, as the Canarsie line has no express tracks. You said that G's Crosstown line has two tracks with no express or local. And what about the J/Z's Nassau Street line with all 2 tracks in revenue service. J/Z was suspose to be Nassau Street Local. If a line has 6-7 or more stations it is consider being a local train without express tracks and just only 2 tracks. Just like the N train's BMT Astoria Line, with 7 stations although with one center express track except Queensboro Plaza and Astoria - Ditmars Boulevard in Astoria, Queens. --24.189.168.173 (talk) 6:36 p.m., 5 September 2010 (UTC)

It's a shame to two editors, who reverted my constructive edits

You two (Accp10 and IGeminix), what makes you two think that my edits are unnessary just like the one I wrote on the IRT White Plains Road Line. Also, you guys have been ignoring me for no reason. You don't see me ignore your eidtings DO I!!!. D:<

Neither of us reverted you on IRT White Plains Road Line. Check the page history. Acps110 (talk • contribs) 02:26, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive edits

You've just returned from your most recent block, and now we see you adding irrelevant editorial comment to an article. If you ignore the advice you received and continue with disruptive edits, your next block will be for much longer. David Biddulph (talk) 07:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WOW!!!! I was saying the right thing on the IRT White Plains Road Line history about the project that is causing the 5 train to etheir stop running express, but you idiot just wanna give me HELLL!!!!! RIGHT!!!????? D:<<<<<

Your editing

Okay, this is really becoming tiresome, but I'll try again to explain some things.

  1. This is an encyclopedia, not a guide to the New York transit system. It is unnecessary to have every tiny bit of information that is available included in our articles.
  2. You have been edit warring with two other editors, one who has been here several years and has made thousands of edits. When they tell you that you're doing something the wrong way you should stop and consider that maybe they're right.
  3. Now, this is what got you blocked before: If you are in a disagreement with someone else, please remember to maintain a civil attitude. This is the right way. This is not. Wikipedia is a collaborative project and uncivil remarks toward and about your fellow editors makes this a difficult place to work.

Now that that's out of the way, it is obvious to me that you are keenly interested in articles about the NYCS and that your intentions are to improve them. Great! We welcome enthusiasm, and there are a couple of suggestions I'd like to make to help you channel that enthusiasm in a positive direction. First, you should think about registering for a full account. It's free and very simple. Second, you should consider entering our Adopt-a-user program, where a patient, experienced user will give you advice and help to guide you along so that you can learn good editing habits and how to avoid conflicts.

So, what'll it be? Working with the system or not being allowed to edit at all? It's your choice. As always, if you have any questions about this or most anything else, feel free to visit my talkpage. —DoRD (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well I am going to work with the system and yes I WILL STILL EDIT!!! D:<

Very well. Unfortunately, I see that your disagreeable attitude has continued this morning. As I just told Acps110, I do not want to block you from editing, but I will if I think it's necessary. If another admin sees some of your edits, they may not be so patient with you. Please stop before that happens and read through some of the pages I linked above. —DoRD (talk) 14:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LMAO!!! I looked at your user page about what the girl and you were saying about me. I AM NOT damaging any projects. GOSH!! Why you guys just love starting problems with me. Am I doing anything to personal attack you guys or WHAT!!! AHHHHHHHHHH!!!! I tried to make an acount but failed saying Login error Incorrect or missing confirmation code. My password is <blanked>, but still failed (this is why I chose not to make an account rather then becoming a great editor). WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT GIRL ACCP10?????? D:<<<<< IS SHE TRYING TO TAKE CONTROL OF MY LIFE OR WHAT!!!! AND NOW SHES ASKING YOU TO BLOCK WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE!!!! O:<<<<

I'm sorry, but that response is entirely unacceptable, so I have re-blocked this IP for two weeks. —DoRD (talk) 14:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and when you create an account, the system sends you an email to which you must respond. If you do not respond within 24 hours, your account is not activated and you will be unable to log in. —DoRD (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You have been blocked from editing for a period of two weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —DoRD (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Sorry, but after that outburst, I have revoked your ability to edit this page as well, and am considering extending the length of your block until you can show that you are more in control of your temper. —DoRD (talk) 15:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

G

Once again you cannot say the tracks are local without express tracks, it is the same with the L, it is just called Canarise Local and Crosstown Local because it is not an express service, if anything it should be called Canarise Line and Crosstown Line by the MTA. Also, Acps uses New Lots because New Lots is within East New York and wiki is about being concise and therefore you should use the more precise info instead of the more general info.--IGeMiNix (talk) 00:50, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining to me. I'll stop then. But the 57th St page needs touching though. Some peak direction N trains do terminating there during weekdays times.

By the way, I wonder why Accp10 did'nt explain this to me first? o.e

He is not on lol but yes you can try but please try not to use all trains because as you said peak direction N trains do stop there, so try to work around that wording into a way that explains that most service uses local but not all. Also please sign with the 4~. --IGeMiNix (talk) 01:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I wrote most trains use the local tracks. I miss the W and V lines. W train replaced by the N and Q lines in both Queens and Manhattan (the Q express stops at 49th St due to higher ridership and heavy useage, and Q runs express elsewhere in Manhattan until Times Sq - 42 St).

Reply

This is in reply to your message.

First, as suggested above, please always sign your talkpage messages by including ~~~~. Otherwise, conversations can be very difficult to follow.
Second, I doubt that any of the other editors, and certainly not myself, want to drive you away from Wikipedia. They want the information to be as correct and accurate as possible and I'm trying to keep the peace and prevent any damage to the project.
While I know practically nothing about NY subways, the other editors to those articles clearly do. You also appear to know quite a bit about the topic. It seems to me that they do not agree with the style or wording of your edits, which leads you to become frustrated or angry. I understand. You believe that your way is better, but simply changing the articles over and over again just leads to more conflict. You really do need to discuss the changes with other editors on the article talk pages. If the other editors agree with your changes, great! If not, you need to accept it and find something else to edit. —DoRD (talk) 16:51, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I understand. User talk:24.189.168.173 7:15 p.m. 9/21/10

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:46, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Accounts

Earlier, you mentioned that you had registered for an account but weren't able to login. If you give me the account name, I can look into the problem, but if you'd prefer to not leave the account name here in public, there is an alternate method. Send an email, from the same email address you tried to register with, to accounts-enwiki-l@lists.wikimedia.org with the username you registered and an explanation of the problem you're having with the account and I or another account creation team member will take a look at it. There are a number of benefits to editing with a registered account, but the one I couldn't live without is the watchlist. —DoRD (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Thank you for telling me this. User talk:24.189.168.173 9/22/10 7:21 p.m.

57th Street

I reverted your edits for two reasons:

1. There are a lot of subway lines that have occasional rush-hour trains that have shorter-than-normal routes, not just the N to 57th Street. Examples include the 1 to Dyckman Street, 7 to 111th Street, F to Kings Highway, J/Z to Broadway Junction, and L to Myrtle - Wyckoff Avenues. We only include normal service, and the N does not normally terminate at 57th Street.

2. We only include information about regular revenue service. No trains regularly run through the connection to the 63rd Street Line from 57th Street. Construction happens all the time and they can cause unused connections or tracks to be used for the duration, including the 4 on the IRT Jerome Avenue Line express tracks, 5 via the South Ferry-Bowling Green Loop, and the M to use the Montague Street Tunnel from Broad Street. The R is not the only line that has used the Broadway-63rd Street connection in the past. The Q also used it for several weekends in 2007 and during the Manhattan Bridge construction in 1995. A shuttle also ran from 21st Street-Queensbridge to 57th Street back in 1998 while the tunnel was rehabilitated.

So rule of thumb, do not include information about shortened rush hour routes or construction information because they happen all the time. And one other thing, stop making fun of User:Acps110. The Legendary Ranger (talk) 12:48, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Be quitet. I was not making fun of Accp10. I though it was her who reverted my edits until Geminx explain to me to read the pages history. Now, I know how to thanks to him. Read through my edits again. That's how smart you feel. SMARTY PANTS! D:< Did I say the R train regulary uses the IND 63rd Street to get to IND Queens Boulevard. There are more reasons, don't try and think that I'm causing problems with anybody including Acp10. I did not made fun of her. Look through my edits. If you think you are the SMART.... Then let me tell you this.

1. Don't try and lie and say I'm making fun of someone.

2. I'll include regular services next time.

3. Don't start problems with me. D:<

Okay fine, I hope you know what to do now, but let me ask you this, why do you keep saying that Acps110 is female? how do you know this? The Legendary Ranger (talk) 23:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beacause that's what I think. from 24...173

Okay, you know what? Maybe editing Wikipedia isn't something you should be doing right now. Your response above really isn't acceptable. Our policies, particularly WP:CIVIL in this case, require you communicate in a way that isn't rude and disrespectful. Maybe that's the way you talk to your friends or classmates, but we really can't allow that here. Also, your #1 above looks like an accusation of lying, and that is considered a personal attack. I'm trying to help you out here, but your editing is causing me to run out of patience with you. I would prefer to allow you to edit the encyclopedia, but if you continue to to be combative, rude, and disrespectful to other editors, you will leave me with only one option.
Consider this a final warning: If you make any more disruptive edits to articles, including edit warring with other editors, make any more personal attacks, or continue to be uncivil toward other editors, you will be blocked for a very long time. —DoRD (talk) 12:58, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I bet if I get angry, even just one tiny bit, you will still block me for a very long for nine weeks right, DoRD. You'll feel good about that, right? Please tell me if this response is acceptable or not? And I actually believe that what will give you the right to block me for a longer time, hmmm? It's like saying all you want and the others is to get rid of me from here. Tell me the truth, DoRD? I do not make any disruptive edits, I learn from many NYC line pages and I find a way to make sentence shorter. Oh, and by the way, I have fixed the A train article but I need to find two new pictures of a A train of R46s suwbay cars and A train of R44 subway cars to improve the article. Go ahead, if you think a nine week block is the answer. I won't stop you. One little thing, you block me for fifteen weeks. If I say bubble, will you block me? hmmm? This mean and strict website. One more thing, is this response acceptable or not? D:< O:< {}:<

The above response (from 24.189.168.173, who still hasn't learned the common courtesies like signing his messages), and the earlier response, do give the impression that the user hasn't learned from his previous blocks for disruptive editing, edit warring, incivility, personal attacks, and harassment, nor from at least 2 referrals (here and here here) to ANI. He shows no sign of being prepared to co-operate with other editors, so one can't help but agree with DoRD that this young user doesn't belong here until he grows up and hopefully develops some maturity. David Biddulph (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You stupid. Your damn foolish!!!!!!!!!! You crazy ass David!!!!!!!! DORD!!!!!!!!!! WHAT THE HELL YOU GONNA DO

To edit, please log in.

Editing by unregistered users from your shared IP address or address range may be currently disabled due to abuse. However, you are still able to edit if you sign in with an account. If you are currently blocked from creating an account, and cannot create one elsewhere in the foreseeable future, you may follow the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account to request that volunteers create your username for you. Please use an email address issued to you by your ISP, school or organization so that we may verify that you are a legitimate user on this network. Please reference this block in the comment section of the form.

Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. We apologize for any inconvenience.

JamesBWatson (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of my enemies

This is a list of the editors I don't get along with are listed here:

User talk:JamesBWatson (central enemy) User talk:David Biddulph (secondary enemy) User talk:Department of Redundancy Department (major enemy) User talk:Acps110 (minor enemy) User talk:IGeMiNix (minor enemy)

Yo James. You freaking violated now!! So none of you guys don't want me here just because of my anger problems at the age of 13. Like I SAID!!! I was trying to learn from my past blocks until Dord!!!!! When I get back, I will ask for all of your addresses. I want to go to your houses and beat you guys up for the violation of my account. Especially David and DORD!!! THEY FREAKING ME SO DAMN ANGRY!!!! IF ONLY I WAS A VERY STRONG KID!!!! I'LLL MAKE YOU ALL PAY !!! D:<<<<<<< O:<<<<<< EVEN IF I WERE TO GO TO THE STORE BUY A GUN AND USE IT TO DEFEND MYSELF, THEN ONE DAY PULL OUT THE GUN AND BLOW YOUR HEADS OFF!!! MY LIFE IS MISERABLE IN WIKIPEDIA ALL CUZ OF YOU GUYS!!!! I WAS THIS CLOSE INTO BECOME A CONSTRUCTIVE EDITOR!!! THAT'S WHEN THAT DAMN DAVID CAME AND THAT CRAZY DORD!!!! JAMES, I WANT MY FKKKKKKKKKKKING ACCOUNT UNBLOCKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! D:<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<O:<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< IN SCHOOL, I WAS DAYDREAMING OF KILLING YOU GUYS!!!!!! D:<<<<<<<<<<< O:<<<<<<<<<<< I'M FKKKING SERIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DON'T PLAY WITH ME!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M SERIOUS ABOUT IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'LL GO ON MY RAMPAGE WHEN I GET BACK ON DECEMBER 24, 2010!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AND DAVID I'D LOOKED AT ONE OF YOUR COMMENTS AT DORD'S PAGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YOU WILL BE THE FIRST PERSON I WILL GO ON MY ROMPAGE WITH IN WIKIPEDIA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M NOT JOKING!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M VERY SERIOUS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This guy is hilarious.--IGeMiNix (talk) 23:48, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shut the fck up. You stupid bastard.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:24.189.168.173&oldid=386843118"