Jump to content

Talk:Naruto Uzumaki

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tintor2 (talk | contribs) at 23:18, 9 October 2010 (→Updated the Plot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAnime and manga B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Scapler, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors

Merchandising

[1] and [2] are only ones I found about that. Im not sure what kind of merchandising we need to put.Tintor2 (talk) 9:51, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Requesting a lock to prevent Vandalism

I've been going over the older versions of the article and I've been noticing an increase in vandalism by new users and anonymous users. This article should be locked, only allowing established users to edit, to stop the vandalism. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSaiyaMan (talk • contribs) 17:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of it is good faith edits though, mostly undone because many editors do not read the article before adding duplicate information. Scapler (talk) 21:13, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On second thought, maybe that would be a good idea, per this version. which I just reverted. Scapler (talk) 02:51, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Protect it, just make sure to leave the talk page open to IPs, not all of us are vandals. 189.4.250.18 (talk) 00:07, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a lot of vandalism on this article, discovered today. Can someone correct it all? Zhane Masaki (talk) 18:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There is "weird ass gay kid" on it. Benos. Obvious trolls are obvious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.107.62.152 (talk) 10:48, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto Four Tails picture

I think this artical should have a picture of naruto in his four tails state or transformation(I dont know which one). Beacause he usses it in serveral battles. Poohman0 (talk) 05:11, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Forget the 4-tails! Naruto's using the 6-tailed fox-cloak now that Pain's killed Hinata. 75.157.126.31 (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think Hinata is dead and you are correct but the four tails pic is in color Poohman0 (talk) 04:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't we mention sage mode as well and the picture of hi min sage mode?Haseo445 (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Several battles? Naruto only used his Four-Tailed Fox-Cloak three times, and the manga shows two of them. Once vs. Jiraya, once vs. Orochimaru, and once vs. Pain. Count 'em. Three. And where would we put the picture in the article? We already have a picture of Naruto using the Rasengan in the One-Tailed Fox Cloak, so would we replace it with the Four-Tails picture, or wait a few weeks until the Pain Invades Konoha arc in the anime winds up to get a picture of the Six-Tailed Cloak or Eight-Tailed Cloak? Personally, I say stick with the One-Tailed Cloak for now or the article will either become overcrowded or begin to resemble the Naruto Wiki. 75.157.115.154 (talk) 03:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nine tails

we should add that naruto has broken one of the seals and allowing him to use all 9 tails, but that the fourth hokage (aka naruto's father) would appear in his conscience if 8 tails appeared.Haseo445 (talk) 15:50, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If we add that, we should add at least a few details on his battle with Pain and confrontation with Nagato to the plot summary. 142.26.133.248 (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    • Uh that's not what happened. First off, theres only ONE seal. Naruto was just getting angrier and angrier, thinking things were helpless and the fox was using his anger to unleash his power to free himself. At the eighth tail, Naruto had to physically remove the seal to get all nine tails, but that would kill him and unleash a fully reborn Kyubi. Minato appeared because it was a SAFEGUARD to keep the Kyubi from breaking free. (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:27, 19 June 2009 (UTC).[reply]

the plot overview needs editing

The plot overview is confusing. It's not even written in chronological order. Can someone fix this? Alphapeta (talk) 04:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

    • I've tried. Someone kept reverting it because they don't like the way canon order follows. Calling it 'original research' thus inadmissable. SuperSaiyaMan (talk)
A lot of relevant things have happened to Naruto since he last met Itachi, and while I agree that chapter-by-chapter updates are not kosher, we should include his training with Fukasaku, fight with Pain and meeting with his father.
Two of the three are already mentioned (one more explicitly than the other), albeit not at the end of the section. In case that leads to a question of "why?", the Part II paragraph is organized by topic; first Akatsuki, then Sasuke. ~SnapperTo 04:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Such a format is outdated and leaves a lot of accuracy to be desired. If someone reads the article as is-they'll think Jiraiya died before Naruto completed his Futon: Rasenshuriken and that Naruto defeated Pain before defeating Kakuzu. --SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see that now, but his meeting with his dad's ghost is still an important revelation for him, and what about his begging the Raikage not to order Sasuke's execution (probably trivial)? Although nothing's come of it as of yet, I get the feeling something big's gonna happen. 142.26.133.248 (talk) 21:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
His meeting with Minato did had a explicit change on his personality with the exception of being a bit happier. He only received a hint of how he can bring peace and had sealed the fox once again.Tintor2 (talk) 01:28, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should we include that he is now training to control the Nine-Tailed Fox? I included it, but it was reverted. 75.157.115.154 (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The training did not even begin.Tintor2 (talk) 12:09, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
He has removed the seal on the Kyuubi, though. Or at least he ate the frog that has the key to the Kyuubi's cage. Should we include this? 75.157.115.154 (talk) 03:33, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Naruto has finished his "training" - defeating the hatred within him - and is now fighting the Nine-Tails. I added this to the article, but it was reverted. I take it that it would be prudent to wait until the battle with the Kyuubi has been concluded to add it? 75.157.78.82 (talk) 20:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Updated the Plot

Now that Naruto's beaten the Nine-Tailed Fox, I've updated the article to summarize the basic events of chapters 490-499. If anyone thinks what I've added can be improved upon, please do so. 75.157.125.234 (talk) 05:49, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naruto controlling the Fox is already in the abilities section, so it does not need to be in the plot overview.Tintor2 (talk) 16:06, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK, but what about his mom being the Fox's prior host, the one who destroyed Konoha and was killed by Minato? She doesn't have a section on the character page, so where should we add that? 75.157.120.15 (talk) 02:34, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Not for this section. May be more notable for Fox's section.Tintor2 (talk) 12:05, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Fox doesn't have much of a section, and what's there leaves little room for additions. 75.157.120.15 (talk) 05:28, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Such a format is outdated and leaves a lot of accuracy to be desired. If someone reads the article as is-they'll think Jiraiya died before Naruto completed his Futon: Rasenshuriken and that Naruto defeated Pain before defeating Kakuzu. --SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 19:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Does the article tells in that such things happen in some order? Besides, you appear to find current events in the manga more important than previous ones, and that's no reason to change images.Tintor2 (talk) 22:04, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Given its a PLOT OVERVIEW, and we basically have the part 1 plot in order, yes, we have to have the Part 2 part in order. Otherwise, it's confusing. And yes, current events in the manga sometimes retcon things. We have to keep this article up to date and make things not confusing to the readers. --SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 22:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, the Sasuke Uchiha article's plot overview is in order, why not have Naruto's in order? Why leave Naruto's as a confusing mess that screws up events?--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 22:29, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please avoid making changes without consensus. I rearranged the plot overview section to remove the ability parts which are misleading. References have to be formatted with cite book to be more specific rather than just giving the chapters. The Part II image is blank and white making it less informative than the Part I, which also shows his Rasengan which is also discussed in the article. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:32, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How will we make a 'consensus'? There are only TWO of us here discussing this. And how are the 'ability parts' misleading when I put them down? How is citing just the volume more specific than the actual chapter itself? And how is the Part II image less informative than the outdated Part I one? Just because Naruto is using a Rasengan in it? It doesn't reflect current data. Tintor, stop sticking with the outdated and confusing parts of the article please.--SuperSaiyaMan (talk) 22:49, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The abilities parts are for the section from the same name. Current is important for real world information, not fictional. Giving unformatted refs for an article is not encyclopedic as read will have no idea where is such chapter from, and will only work in a wikia.Tintor2 (talk) 23:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Naruto_Uzumaki&oldid=389786985"