Jump to content

Talk:Olivia de Havilland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SmackBot (talk | contribs) at 11:47, 12 October 2010 (Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBiography: Actors and Filmmakers Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Top-importance).


Academy Tribute

I was wondering if it was worth mentioning in the article Olivia's upcoming Academy tribute? [1]. Or maybe we should put it in after the event has occurred? Crisso 21:21, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link to "The Light in the Piazza" takes you to the current Broadway musical of that name, not the 1962 film that Ms. DeHavilland appeared in. 4.232.186.240 04:16, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! She must be 90 about now! I loved her in "Hush… Hush, Sweet Charlotte". --66.218.12.60 02:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cleanup required

It looks like in the past this page may have suffered sneaky vandalism with a bunch of things being simply wrong in the current text. For example the the law refered to as the De Haviland Law, is usually called the "Olivia de Havilland clause" which limits artists contracts to a maximum of seven years. Other things like Gloria Stuart had a return to fame in the 1990s, not 1980s. Someone who has time and the knowledge please clean up this article. Dowew 20:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard it called the "De Havilland decision" and the "De Havilland law" but I've never heard it referred to as the "De Havilland clause". By the way, the article says Gloria Stuart returned to fame in her 80s, not the 80s. Crisso 09:03, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the "description" of Gloria Stuart in this paragraph does her a disservice, like she never did anything worthwhile before that. Wouldn't it better to write something along the lines of "star of minor movies in the 30s" etc? Dollvalley 14:47, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last surviving star of GWTW

Wouldn't it be even better to add that she has survived the 3 other stars of Gone with the Wind by several decades? The last other star, Vivien Leigh, died more than 30 years ago, with Gable in 1961 and Howard in 1943. It would add an extra something.

Just my two cents: is this the very best picture available for this article? Certainly Google-imaging should produce something better than a vidcap. Olivia deserves better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by JackofOz (talkcontribs) dated: 4 June 2007

Film debut

Although the article says she began her career with Alibi Ike, this is not strictly true. The first film she made was A Midsummer Night's Dream, but this was released after the next two films she made, Alibi Ike and The Irish In Us. Crisso (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Per debate and discussion re: assessment of the approximate 100 top priority articles of the project, this article has been included as a top priority article. Wildhartlivie (talk) 10:58, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upcoming movie conjecture

I can't verify that de Havilland is involved with the upcoming I-59 South AKA The Portal film and at age 92 I'd say this is not going to happen. I think this is the same kind of wishful thinking that was the basis of last year's untrue rumors that she and Meryl Streep were to star in a biopic of Brooke Astor. Anyone else feel that this section should be deleted?

Devin M (talk) 17:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

I removed some hyperbole added to the lead of the article. We just don't refer to someone as an "Academy Award-winning actress" in the lead, much less refer to her sister as such. All the content about the remaining classic era actresses is also hyperbole. I reverted the change of the lead image that was made based on a talk page comment about the lead photo, because the comment was made on June 4, 2007, at which time File:Olivia De Havilland in In This Our Life trailer.jpg was the lead photo. That did need changed. I see little to no difference between the current lead photo, in her most recognizable role from Gone With the Wind, and the one that added. Wildhartlivie (talk) 11:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. The Gone With the Wind image is a better choice, in my opinion, because it's a better picture of her, but also a more notable, recognisable role. The other one is quite obscure. Rossrs (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

John Huston affair

While the Relationshiops section of this arcile is currently made up entirely of the affair she never had with Errol Flynn, there is no mention whatsoever of the affair she DID have with John Huston. I'm not sure if either she of Huston ever publically acknowledged it but I think it's safe to say it did occur. Crisso (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]