User talk:1234r00t

Leave me a message Or send me an email.

user talk contribs email interwiki editcount Please do not post silly comments or vandalism. Personal attacks, vandalism, yelling-type comments and other forms of disruption will be immediately reverted and users trolling or vandalizing may be blocked for more than one offense. Use the Sandbox for testing edits and the like. For those asking a question, making a comment or request, alerting me for mistakes, deletion of page discussion or other stuff or any incidents or any other fluff, leave it here and I will try if possible to answer as soon as possible. Thank You! For editors reverting vandalism, thank you very much! 1234r00t (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) AfC submissions Random submission 2+ months 1,781 pending submissions to update If you can solve this problem I'll give you 1000 WikiBucks. There are 37 numbers under 150 that cannot be expressed as the sum of a perfect square. What is the highest one? Example for one that can be expressed as perfect square was 150= 1 + 102 + 72. Adoption I am a boy who would like to learn how to use Wikipedia properly. I've always attempted to contribute but I can never seem to get it right. Could you mentor me please? -Damon ;) 00:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Live? Hey there. Is Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-05-03/Communist_Party_of_India_(Marxist) still active? If so, where is it taking place? If not, would you like to archive the case? Netalarmtalk 17:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC) Sorry. I had given up on that. By a quick look I see the latest comment by involved parties are two months old on the talk page. I'll mark it as closed. Mr. R00t Talk 00:24, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Little Ten Conference You need to review the definition of vandalism and stop issuing bad warnings. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 19:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC) And you need to check your talk page. :) I made a mistake. Sorry, Mr. R00t Talk 19:50, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Man You are quick on the draw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.177.113.33 (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Well, that's sort of the point... You vandalize, I revert as quickly as possible. Mr. R00t Talk 20:31, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Careful... ? Airplaneman ✈ 20:45, 9 October 2010 (UTC) How was that a constructive edit? Mr. R00t Talk 20:46, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Oh, I didn't realize that was a user page. I'll go apologize to the user. Mr. R00t Talk 20:47, 9 October 2010 (UTC) Hello user: Mr. Root the reason of my message is for asking if you would be able to check a paragraph about how north mexican states celebrated the bicentennial day. As soon as I finish it, i will send it to you thanks.C.E.Q. (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2010 (UTC) An update from adopt a user Hi there 1234r00t! You may be wondering, what have I done to sound the alarm this time? Nothing. I'm messaging you in regards to the adopt-a-user program, which currently has a backlog of users wishing to be adopted. This doesn't make much sense, as we have a considerable list of users offer adoption, so there shouldn't be any backlog. I've begun to eliminate this backlog myself through a matching program, but I need your help to make it work. Of course, adoptees and adopters don't have to go through there, but I believe it helps eliminate the backlog because someone is actively matching pairs. On the list of adopters, I have modified the middle column to say "Interests." It's easier working with other users that have similar interests, so if it's not too much to ask, could you add your interests in the middle column? For example, if I was interested in hurricanes, computers, business, and ... reptiles? I would place those in the middle column. Counter-vandalism and the like can also be included (maintenance should be used as the general term). The more interests, the better, since adoptees can learn more about you and choose the one they feel most comfortable working with. The information about when you're most active and other stuff can go into the "Notes" section to the right. Finally, I've gone around and asked adoptees (and will in the future) to fill in a short survey so adopters can take the initiative and contact users they feel comfortable working with. We all know that most adoptees just place the adopt me template on their user page and leave it - so it's up to us to approach them and offer adoption. So, please take a look at the survey, adopt those that fit your interests, and maybe watchlist it so you can see the interests of adoptees and adopt one that fits your interests in the future. Once again, thank you for participating in the adopt-a-user program! If you wish to respond to this post, please message me on my talk page. Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Netalarm (talk) at 05:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC). List articles and verifiability Are list articles such as this subject to verifiability and if so would that mean it's ok to put a unreferenced template on one? Some lists are just really obscure. Devourer09 (t·c) 14:14, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Everything in mainspace is subject to WP:V. I went ahead and tagged that article for you. The answer is yes, they are. And sorry yet again for the late response. I didn't see your comment. Just a quick question for you, do you have this page watched? I want to know so I don't give you a {{Talkback}} template every time you ask a question. Mr. R00t Talk 22:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Survey? I was under the impression that Netalarm's survey was for adoptees...do you really want to be adopted? PrincessofLlyr royal court 16:13, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Looks like that message was written for adopters, considering it mentions the unadopted user backlog. Devourer09 (t·c) 16:35, 12 October 2010 (UTC) I clicked on the wrong link apparently, or he linked to the wrong place. I definitely do not want to be adopted. That is rather odd though. I'll look around and see. Also try contacting Netalarm with a diff to his edit to this page. Mr. R00t Talk 22:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Hello Vegetarian dude. Hello, I was wondering if you could adopt me on wikipedia, to know how to use it properly, not just for saving my ass on hwk. Could you? Hugs.  Done- just so you know, when you post on a talk page you should sign comments with ~~~~. Mr. R00t Talk 22:31, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Suggestions Hello, user: Mr. R00t i had been trying to contact you in order for you to check a section i had wrote about the celebration of the mexican independence in the northern states of Mexico such as coahuila, zacatecs, san luis and others. So i will be glad if you check it and suggest me what should i change. Thanks C.E.Q. (talk) 18:40, 12 October 2010 (UTC) Sorry for the late reply, what is the article? Mr. R00t Talk 00:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Office 2007 Page I have fully made the Office 2007 comparison sheet extensive and had made it look much better. It shows two charts of information in one and I made sure that all of the information is accurate and correct by looking at the previous chart. I used the formatting from the Office 2010 comparison chart. I would like it if that edit could be left, as I have made both 2007 and the 2010 office pages great by adding more information and fixing false information. Thank you. Elliot Thomas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.87.224.103 (talk) 00:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Ahh, apologies. I was only looking at a single diff which showed a very large piece of information being deleted. It did not show any other edits. What's more, it hit an edit filter which marked it as "Probable Vandalism". Sorry for the misunderstanding, Mr. R00t Talk 00:39, 14 October 2010 (UTC) No problem, thank you for fixing. - Elliot —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.87.224.103 (talk) 01:02, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Hi! Great userpage and userboxes!!! I think I'm going to borrow a few of the UBX's. Best, Rob ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 01:11, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Go ahead. You don't even have to give attribution for the Userboxen. Mr. R00t Talk 01:13, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Yeah, I know... just like being polite - and noticed similar interests (hence grabbing some of the UBX's) :-) Rob ROBERTMFROMLI TALK/CNTRB 02:29, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Okay. I didn't see your signature and assumed you were a new-ish user instead of an experienced one. Mr. R00t Talk 02:49, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Re: Speedy deletion contested: Chase Fleisch FYI, I've restored the deletion request on Chase Fleisch, because it is a clear candidate under A7 because the claims are outrageous, incredulous and supported squarely by the fact that they are not sourced. Further, instead of templating regulars with messages that are clearly at the time completely moot, which messages are designed to instruct new users, and declining deletion on articles which so obviously warrant deletion under asserted or under other valid grounds you should instead correct the tag yourself, such as with a BLP PROD. If you have any questions or require any assistance, please don't hesitate to drop them on my talk page. Cheers!  :-)    Thorncrag   02:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC) You're right, sorry. Mr. R00t Talk 02:51, 14 October 2010 (UTC) hi, thank you for snding me a message, yes i will like you to help me with my writting in English. Right now we are working on chosing a topic for our final project and writte it in Wikipedia, any ideas. MontseSalin (talk) 03:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC) Talkback Hello, 1234r00t. You have new messages at HJ Mitchell's talk page. Message added 03:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Your revert on Bomb must have been a mistake... I reverted your revert on Bomb. Given your normally reasonable editing patterns, I can only expect that your revert was some kind of mistake. If it wasn't a mistake, you would have decided that my two edits were objectionable in LESS THAN ONE MINUTE. Surely you usually give such things more thought than that. Also, you didn't give edit comments explaining your reasons for revert, something experienced editors like yourself usually do, unless the edit is made by mistake. You also sent some kind of warning to my (IP) talk page calling my edits "non constructive" when a half of a second's glance would see that they were not. Again, most editors only do this kind of thing by mistake. My first edit was clearly a copy edit correcting an obviously awkward construction. In the second edit, I took the time to check the reference and found it and the whole sentence to be inapplicable. The second edit could be legitimately argued, but you didn't make any argument in your edit comments, leaving the impression of mere impetuousness on your part. That may not be the case, but it sure looks that way when edit comments are blank and when a "knee jerk" reaction is made so quickly. But, I'm sure it was a mistake.  :-) 108.7.7.6 (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)