Jump to content

User talk:Number 57

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 81.149.124.51 (talk) at 08:23, 29 October 2010 (→Cheshunt FC). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome Click here to leave a new message.
Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1 (Dec 2006 - Nov 2007)
  2. Archive 2 (Nov 2007 - Jul 2008)
  3. Archive 3 (Jul 2008 - Jun 2009)
  4. Archive 4 (Jun 2008 - )

Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:

  1. Proposal to Close This RfC
  2. Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy

Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 03:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FC Unirea Urziceni

Could you throw your eye to this article again, editors are edit warring to insert the score from last night's game into the lead and also the body of the article, thanks. Mo ainm (talk) 13:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bravo

Well done on the completion of your Knesset members project! Wierzba (talk) 00:02, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yehuda Avner

Thanks for your help with the Yehuda Avner page. I'm not so familiar with Wikipedia editing so could you help me out and display the image at File:Yehuda_Avner.jpg on Yehuda Avner? Thanks! Max613 (talk) 22:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Max613 (talk) 21:46, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

hey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.40.11.47 (talk) 16:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Naming

Hello. I noticed you've edited the template, and I would like to propose renaming of {{Czechoslovakian elections}} and linked articles to "Czechoslovak elections". The proper adjective is "Czechoslovak", in line with adjectives "Czech" and "Slovak", not "Czechoslovakian", although this form is also used in English. Regards. - Darwinek (talk) 14:04, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The fact, that you did not hear it is not a valid argument. :) The form "Czechoslovak" is just the correct one, the same way as "Slovak", not "Slovakian". Moreover it is used widely throughout the WP and the real world. See, e.g. the Czech Republic official promotion website or the Slovak Republic official promotion website. - Darwinek (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sixteenth government of Israel

Updated DYK query On March 22, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sixteenth government of Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Seventeenth government of Israel

Hello! Your submission of Seventeenth government of Israel at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Soman (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still needs a response. Gatoclass (talk) 11:49, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MLS standings

I just thought you'd find it interesting that because of your contributions to Talk:2010 Major League Soccer season, you've been implicated in not-so-thinly-veiled accusations of being my sockpuppet. I apologize for the inconvenience and I thought I would bring it to your attention. -- Grant.Alpaugh 17:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RFC on 2010 MLS

Per your comments on the RFC at Talk:2010 Major League Soccer season, I renamed the thread there, and I restarted the RFC thread with nothing but the title, the RFC tag, and my initial description. Grsz11 disagreed with my change in format and reverted it. I don't want to get into an edit war, so since you were the one who brought it up, will you just "blank" the thread as you were talking about so there's no ambiguity. Thanks. -- Grant.Alpaugh 17:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

c

Updated DYK query On April 7, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Seventeenth government of Israel, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry I'm not interested in that part of it.--Türk Süvarisi (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Buckner International

Can you please explain how a $78 million dollar a year budget nonprofit is not worthy for a wiki? Why was this deleted?

Arab localities

Hi, some time ago you started several stubs on Arab localities in Israel, like Ed Dahi, Sulam. It looks in fact as if the villages are much older than indicated. Could you please tell us which source you used? Thanks, Huldra (talk) 12:21, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you very much. I can say, though, that at least for Sulam the info on Hebrew wp is then wrong; the village has a documented history going back way beyond the 18th century. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 13:03, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy Kébé

Hello,

Sorry about this, but you were the first admin I came across who wasn't obviously on a Wikibreak.

Can you please lock the above article due to the vandalism from delirious Reading fans?

Thanks,

SCIAG (talk) 20:19, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Plaid Cymru

I've opened a discussion at Talk:Plaid Cymru#Nationalist party? regarding the dispute on the main page. Please feel free to contribute. Thanks - Galloglass 10:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template policy discussion

You are invited to help consider a common template policy for all WP:SPORTS biography articles at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Sports#Template_policy_discussion.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:54, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Twenty-ninth government of Israel

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

late answers

Hi there, check Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Poland/Archive 2#Polish placename. Best, Aviados (talk) 04:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Edward Francis Small

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Botswana judicial reform referendum, 2001

The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Jose Quitongo

Hi, you left a message on the talk page for Jose Quitongo, I think it warrants full protection now? There's still plenty of vandalism going on. Backbeatlistener (talk) 16:32, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Didn't give my opinion. I gave facts so the editor would understand a little bit more about the idea (Israeli politics). I think that's what may be your problem--you continually confuse facts with opinion, and opinion with facts. --Shamir1 (talk) 09:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Shamir1 (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Kadima. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 23:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shamir1

Thank you for this post to my talk page. I was already aware that there were issues with Shamir1's behaviour, and there is no way that I would have taken any further steps in this issue without thoroughly checking his/her record. In fact that was part of why I took the "wait until I have more time" line rather than stepping in immediately: I needed time for that check. Shamir1 made accusations against you. I have no idea whether there was any justification in any of those accusations, and I have no interest in finding out: I am willing to assume good faith on your part. However, Shamir1 is now indefinitely blocked, and I have no intention of pursuing the issue any further, unless someone else asks me to. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:51, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lawrie Wilson

Hi, at 16:46, 1 December 2008 you deleted a page about Lawrie Wilson – citing that there was "no indication that the article may meet guidelines for inclusion". Wholeheartedly agree with the decision to delete the article given that although Wilson had played for a Football League club before in the form of Colchester United, he had never played first–team football – and subsequently does not meet the guidelines for inclusion. However, he is currently playing for Stevenage, who are newly-promoted and Football League bound, will it be fine for me to go ahead and create the article on him now? Thanks. SBFCEdit (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up. I'll hopefully be in touch in August then! SBFCEdit (talk) 14:54, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, Wilson made his first Football League appearance yesterday in Stevenage's 2–2 draw against Macclesfield Town. Any chance you could restore the article? Will you also be so kind as to restore Michael Bostwick's article? Thank you. SBFCEdit (talk) 19:40, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Zoabi

I suggested you take this discussion to the talk page, so that we can come to a consensus on this issue.--TM 14:39, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Milan Pršo

Hello. Just to let you know that I am creating an article that you deleted in 2008. You did right back then, but since then, mostly in the last year, the particular footballer has played in a professional league, now being able of having an article here. Please feel free to contact me if needed. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 03:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Reiman MLS Soccer

Why was this page deleted? I worked pretty hard at gathering sources and putting this up. If you google his name anywhere, it will come up that he has played for Real Salt Lake. There are match reports that say he dressed for a game against Houston Dynamo. There are also many reports that state he was a regular contributor to the Reserve squad, as well as an MLS Bio....Please put this page back up...Professional athletes deserve the notariety —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.15.151.197 (talk) 06:34, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

LOI deprod issue

Thanks for the heads up. I'm not saying that it definitely shouldn't be deleted, but it does not strike me as a clear-cut case (hence my opposition to prodding). I've robustly argued for keep at the AfD, but even if it is ultimately deleted, the discussion should provide a little more clarity. Regards, WFCforLife (talk) 10:13, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Zanzibarian general election, 1957

— Rlevse • Talk • 00:02, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Democratic Republic of the Congo presidential election, 1970

The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Football squad

For what it's worth, I'm going to stop editing for today. But as a member of WP:FOOTY, I recommend that you heed the advice I left on the talk page, per a potential conflict of interest. If you are correct (which I conceed you may have been, although I argue that precisely zero people have made policy-based arguments), another admin can make the edit. Regards, --WFC-- 09:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dávid Gróf

Why have you amended the picture size on the Dávid Gróf article again? Its too small for the infobox now? this was original disagreement with Mattythewhite? Jonesy702 (talk) 21:55, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stadium Merging

Hi, I'm wondering why you merged the article about Hastings United's stadium, The Pilot Field, into the main article. (Don't worry, I'm not a Hastings fan!). Thanks. --Half Price (talk) 17:29, 9 August 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Number 57. You have new messages at Half price0's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Man City AfD

Hello. I wondered how you might respond to the (various) comments I've made at the AfD, but especially the last one. There's a lot of off-policy chitchat distracting the discussions there. --Dweller (talk) 08:37, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Whitton United FC.png

Thanks for uploading File:Whitton United FC.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Thetford Town FC.png

Thanks for uploading File:Thetford Town FC.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:07, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Maccabi Tel Aviv

Are you serious???? it is not cleaning you just deleated 3/4 of the article why?? Maccabit (talk) 08:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) With all due respect the on your opinion it is more important that maccabi lost 4-0 to Hapoel Acre at the cup 5 years ago and not the fact she changed owners twise and the middle of huge rebuilding and by the way maybe you should look some of the European eams articles the resemble tho the old look and not your modification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Maccabit (talk • contribs) 09:20, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So on your opinion Maccabi has no history after the 4-0 loss 5 years ago ??? You can't just delete info because you don't like how it looks edit it , refrase it as you want but don't delete it completely as it never happened.Maccabit (talk) 09:40, 27 August 2010 (UTC) And the fact Maccabi changed owners twice is not worth to mention ???? You are making no sense. This article is supposed to tell Maccabi's history the only thing you seems want to mention is that the club lost 10-0 to haifa and 4-0 to Acre as sort of a milestone but the real thing like the club changing owners is not worth to mentionMaccabit (talk) 11:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus referendum

Hi 57, I started a discussion on the talk, please feel free to contribute. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.207.162.51 (talk) 09:23, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked? Are you the owner of the article? At least support your view at the talk of the article. Waiting —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.207.162.51 (talk) 12:28, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You refuse to talk about the subject, but you blatantly push your POV onto the article. And you are an admin? Unbelievable —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.207.162.51 (talk) 10:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
So what's it gonna be? Will i be waiting forever? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.207.162.51 (talk) 07:02, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lyle Taylor

Hello. You've previously deleted an article on Lyle Taylor as it was for a player who had not made an appearance in a professional game, and hence met WP:ATH. That player made his debut last night, thus meeting the guidelines details here - can you let me have a copy of the deleted content to my sandbox so I can work it up, add references and recreate the article? Thanks Steve-Ho (talk) 06:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richad Antssis

Why do you say that the closure of this AfD restored your faith in the wiki? DavidDublin (talk) 15:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merging of non league stadiums

I notice you are beginning a task of merging certain stadium articles in with main articles. You are doing this stating your belief that stadium which have never hosted national-level football or rugby should not be included. Is this agreed criteria WP:FOOTBALL or is it your POV? if it's your POV which it seems it is, aren't you guilty of breaking the first rule you set out in wikiproblems section on your userpage? If it isn't WP:FOOTBALL criteria, then how do you decide what has and hasn't 'hosted national-level football'? Isn't the FA Cup a national competition? I could argue most of the grounds you have merged have hosted FA Cup matches which means they have hosted national level football? example being Croft Park which you have delinked from the Template:Conference North Venues ready to merge into a main article for Blyth Spartans F.C.. Only 2 season ago this ground hosted Shrewsbury Town F.C. and Blackburn Rovers F.C., the later shown live on TV. My belief is that your criteria for taking on this task is flawed and your POV is not part of WP:FOOTBALL criteria. DJhinckley (talk) 17:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

bedford park rangers f.c. page un-deletion

i created this about a lower league club in the Bedfordshire football league http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bedfordshire_County_Football_League Levels 11-15, Division Four

also there is the B.P.R. website http://www.bedfordparkrangers.co.uk/ and the league site http://full-time.thefa.com/ProcessPublicSelect.do?psSelectedSeason=2062411&psSelectedDivision=1963922&psSelectedCompetition=0&psSelectedLeague=7195521

and the B.P.R. page on that site http://full-time.thefa.com/DisplayTeam.do?teamID=1976234&divisionseason=3546206 and http://full-time.thefa.com/DisplayTeam2.do?id=1976234&seasonTeamID=2464989&divisionseason=3546206

i would request the un-deletion of this page —Preceding unsigned comment added by Duderob92 (talk • contribs) 18:23, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

basingstoke town fc page

Hey, just wondering why you chopped loads of the history out of the Basingstoke Town FC page?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.15.93.3 (talk) 22:37, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperzionism

I just wanted to let you know that this article that you proposed for deletion back in 2008 has now been undeleted following a request on my talk page. -- Ed (Edgar181) 11:50, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hatikva (political party)

Thats just it, that was the only reason. Not disputing whether it is or not, but certain times like this go against the grain of consensus/common knowledge, and this need a clarification.

For example, just today i saw an article that said "liberal-conervative," which as you know is oxymoronic. but i wikilinked it to something that does clarify it. Doesnt seem to be a link to that, so i tagged it. But if you could either explain int he article or under a <ref> tag, then that would be fine.(Lihaas (talk) 10:23, 16 October 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Granted perhaps, but thats a large chunk of readers. Its not the view of the editors alone. Even readers would, again European politics apparently doesnt represent a {{globalise}} view.(Lihaas (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2010 (UTC)).[reply]
Also could you clarify "secular right-winged" at elast in the ref tag?Lihaas (talk) 10:52, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Elections

I see you created the templates for the electoral calendar. We just got consensus to create 2 calendars from 2011 onwards and fiddled with the template. Check it out and see if it needs an improvement (there is a large white space in there that needs correcting)(Lihaas (talk) 02:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Template:Electoral calendar navigation, i thought youd created it. apparently not, but anyhoo..Lihaas (talk) 10:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox member of the Knesset

Hi. Since the template is highly-visible it wouls be better to use a Sandbox for your edits before making a series of changes. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 16:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Richard Smallwood (footballer)

As the deleting admin could you please recreate the above for me to update as he has now made (two) pro-league appearances? Thanks.--Egghead06 (talk) 08:45, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheshunt FC

I see you have made significant changes to the Cheshunt FC page. Can you explain why these changes have been made? The previous page was more detailed.The version you have replaced it with is roughly half the size, contains much less information and is, in my and several other supporters of the club, inferior. I am curious what reasons you had for making these alterations?

Waysider, programme editor 2002-2009, Cheshunt FC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.10.111.144 (talk) 22:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He made similar changes to Basingstoke Town FC and hasn't replied yet... making an encyclopedia less detailed - great job.

Bahraini parliamentary election, 2010

i know theres a mistake coming out, but can we correct it instead of removing it?Lihaas (talk) 14:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So if im understanding right you need at least 2 parties for it to work? (as in this case) because i dont know why this doesnt work.
Per npov, it doesnt really become so, you just list the biggest winners (which is dependent purely on factual voting and not editoral opinion). We planned to do this in Sweden to lsit just the main ones, but then someone corrected the imagfes so we didnt need to.Lihaas (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
not "big," "biggest." as in based directly on the numbers the X # of parties. For one parties that didnt get a seat dont get mention, and for coalition based countries (particularly india and israel, though not Lebanon becasue liek Sweden the alliance would be mentioned) say 2,3,6 seem decent but that could be challenged and consensus gained on respective articles. Infoboxes do offer quick insights into results. (ie- aid navigation)Lihaas (talk) 15:02, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Haim Cohn (or Cohen)

Hi Number 58, a few minutes ago, you moved the article Haim Cohn back to Haim Cohen. The renaming to Haim Cohn had taken place a few days ago and appears to be correct - see comments on the artcle Talk page. Would you please explain (on the article Talk page) why you moved this article. Thanks. Davshul (talk) 09:58, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Number_57&oldid=393573865"