Talk:Code2000
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Code2000 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
Archive 1 up to 14 May 2007 |
Surprised that I couldn't find an existing article on this font and Code2000 redirected to Unicode typefaces. --A12n 16:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Previous versions of this article have been deleted on the grounds that this is not a notable font.jonathon 18:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. I missed that, but for what it's worth, Code2000 has been among those fonts mentioned in some circles for handling diverse character needs. The need for such a font may be decreasing as existing Unicode-encoded fonts are expanded and new ones created, but it still seems noteworthy. --A12n 03:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
deletion has been overturned -- Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_16.
A second nomination for deletion resulted in a speedy keep; all comments apart from the original nomination were to keep. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code2000 (second nomination). —Duae Quartunciae (talk · cont) 02:24, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
- I tried this font, but the upper-case Y appears instead of a lower-case open-tail g [ɡ]. Wikipedia:International_Phonetic_Alphabet#Voiced velar plosive --Mahmudmasri (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
James Kass has some unexplained break:
because his font development is suddenly halted. 83.7.242.254 (talk) 15:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)