Jump to content

User talk:Melber

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Serouj (talk | contribs) at 19:29, 6 November 2010 (Church of Saint George). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Gaeser! I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Marek.69 talk 14:51, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank's, cookies were very tasty :)--Gaeser (talk) 15:47, 10 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sukhum

Following the dispute about Sukhum's twinning, a good cite has been produced that says that the "friendship link" that Kilmarnock has with this town is considered by East Ayrshire Council to be in Abkazia. Irrespective of what may be disputed elsewhere by other parties, and what may be written elsewhere, this is who the East Ayrshire Council says the link is with, and what is cited on the Kilmarnock and East Ayrshire pages. Please do not change this again unless you can cite a better reliable source that says otherwise. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 10:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, Kilmarnock cannot alter the disputed country of Sukhum. But East Ayrshire and Kilmarnock can decide that they have a "friendship link" with Sukhum, Abkazia. It's their "friendship link", they get to decide who it's with, and it's not up to Wikipedia editors to correct them. If you wish to dispute the location of Sukhum I suggest you take up the matter on that article and leave Kilmarnock and East Ayrshire to cited facts that are within the scope of those articles. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:23, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point. The flag should be removed per MOS:FLAG. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 17:20, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mount Kazbek

Gamarjoba, Георгий! Я думаю не стоит вставлять третью карту в статью. тогда придется вставлять и карту россии. Надеюсь ты поймешь правильно. Статье будет только хуже. Или давай обсудим какие две карты должны быть.--Bouron (talk) 08:30, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notices

When you start a discussion about another editor on WP:ANI, it is mandatory that you notify them of the discussion. Please make sure you do this next time. Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to other editors as fascist, racist, and antisemitic is a personal attack. You need really good evidence to justify that sort of thing. Please don't do it again, or you will be blocked. Shimeru 23:10, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oshki

Stop exporting your pro-Georgian PoV-pushism everywhere and start really addressing my arguments. Sardur (talk) 08:16, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, that's easier to repeat the same addressed argument than to answer to mine... Sardur (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
That's a very nice display of your collaborative behaviour. Btw, you're breaching R3R. Sardur (talk) 18:40, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please take note of this. Sardur (talk) 05:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Oshki. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 07:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Z10

Thank you! No sarcasm :) --Gaeser (talk) 13:11, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Collages

Hey, Gaeser, I noticed your splendid collages, but I will need you to clarify something, in each one, you placed a black strip of Georgian writing which doesn't seem to have anything to do with the cities. Do not insert the coat of arms into a city: that goes into a seperate place in the infobox, and the collage is purely to represent how the city looks like. For Tbilisi, you might also want insert a snapshot of the city skyline or a panoramic view. Also, if you could make sure that they don't overlap each other, it would be grearly appreciated. Also, could you doing collages for Kutaisi and Batumi? Thank you.--RM (Be my friend) 18:29, 1 September 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Thanks for your reply. Let me try to clarify something: Although you thought the strip of language would be nice, it actually goes into two seperate places: The infobox native name place and the beginning of the article where it will also name the city in its native alphabet.--RM (Be my friend) 18:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Church of Saint George

Hey, how's it going? With regard to this article, it turns out it's an Armenian church built in the 18th century. There is no evidence of a previous church there, and certainly not any standing structure from the 5th century, so don't claim that it was a "Georgian" church appropriated by the Armenian church! It's exactly the other way around!.. I have cited relevant text for this, and all you have is some website written in Georgian which claims that there was a Georgian church there in the 4th century, and all in passing. Serouj (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So I've modified the article such that it's not written in such an assertive tone: specifically, I've made it clear WHO it is that is making certain claims -- e.g. "the Georgian Orthodox Church claims..." or "According to Samvel Karapetyan..." Serouj (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]