User talk:Nikki311
This is Nikki311's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 |
Happy Nikki311's Day!
User:Nikki311 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it....PS, why don't you archive some of this page? — Rlevse • Talk • 00:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks so much!!! Nikki♥311 03:21, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Question
Hey Nikki! Listen, The World's Greatest Tag Team just passed it's GA review, and Haas is on hold. I'm planning on nominating WGTT as a GT and I was wondering if you could tell me who was reponsible for getting Angle to GA and Benjamin to FA? Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 21:26, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
- Brilliant. Thanks so much. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 11:14, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Opinion/advice
Considering you work mainly in women's wrestling than anywhere else, I thought to ask you about the problem I have. I am currently working on two topics about championships and champions in TNA. The other day it hit me, "Would the Miss TNA crown count as a championship or a accomplishment?". I haven't been able to determine which it would count as. If it counted as a championship, it wouldn't be too hard for me to create an article for it and take it to GA so it would fit into the topic. Though the question isn't if I can, but should I? Not sure if it is notable all on its own. So since women's wrestling is mainly your thing, I thought to ask for your opinion on the matter?--WillC 13:24, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for the feedback. I guess that was a bullet I dodged.--WillC 00:24, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Also, will you move Angel Williams to Angelina Love, per commonname? I tried too, but I can't, an admin must move it.--WillC 03:09, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, I would agree. But considering she is having visa issues, she can't work for any promotion outside of Canada. So she can't become known any wider by Angel Williams or anything else.--WillC 21:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- I noticed that you nominated Michelle McCool at GAN. If that was to pass GA, you would be one article away from getting a Good topic on List of WWE Divas Champions. I went ahead and updated that article to match recent FLs that have passed. But sad to say, if you have any plans to take it to FL, it won't pass. It isn't long enough to qualify as a list. I nominated List of FIP World Heavyweight Champions (now merged with the FIP World Heavyweight Championship) at FLC at 9 champions and I had to withdraw it because it wasn't long enough. Though there is a brightside, you could merge it with the WWE Divas Championship, then follow the format I used with the TNA Legends Championship or the TNA Knockout Tag Team Championship (later would probably be more fitting) and take it to GAN. Just thought to tell you, in case that was your plans so you wouldn't have to travel down that road.--WillC 22:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- I think I would mention that to Scorp, about the idea of a topic. Then merge the list back into the Divas Title and if you want I'll get it prepared for GAN, since I've had a list practice. :) After it passes a GA review the topic will still be featured. Just a small review of it at FT would need to be done. I doubt there will be 10 champions anytime soon. TNA focuses on their women's title alot more than WWE does their's, and there has yet to be 10 champions with it yet. Though, that is just me.--WillC 20:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
I guess you got lucky with the Divas Title. The two new champs were already GAs, so guess you got a break. I bet you were glad you got that break.--WillC 02:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
- True. I wasn't even watching Raw until I saw all these edits for title changes. First thing I thought of was "Nikki is going to have more work to do if she wants that topic now". Then I went and looked. After I noticed they were both already GA I said "Guess Nikki got a break". Well good luck with McCool. You got my support in your quest to get the women title good topics.--WillC 02:58, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
What the??!
What on God's earth do you mean when you say Burial (professional wrestling) "not a notable term on it's own?" There are much LESS NOTABLE terms on that list, but yet they have articles to them. So why regard this one as any different??? (LonerXL (talk) 22:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC))
GAN:FA
can you review the family guy artical for ga. --Pedro J. the rookie 23:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
Vicki Williams
Hi, I did not see your post on Vicki Williams until today. Short answer, I don't for sure - but I doubt there'd be two notable female wrestlers named "Vicki Williams" active around the same time so I'm pretty it was the same person. MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 05:19, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
- I just found a book on Lucha Libre that actually has a chapter on the early days of the UWA Women's championship. It calls her "Vicky Williams", it also states that she was a women's champion from the US that came to mexico and was billed as the first UWA Women's champion on arrival. She wrestled barefoot in the pictures I've seen. I think Vicki, Vickie and Vicky are all the same woman, gotta love inconsistent spelling ;) MPJ-DK (No Drama) Talk 05:51, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
Using someones image
I found a few High Quality images and emailed the author about them and asked for permission to use them for a few knockout pages, however im not sure exactly how to give the files the proper description. I have the email I can forward to you as proof that the author wants the images on the wiki pages.
Image I uploaded: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Lacy_Von_Erich_by_KnightNephrite.jpg
Source: http://KnightNephrite.deviantart.com/art/Lacy-Von-Erich-138968024
If you need the email where permission was given I can provide that upon request.StarEnerg (talk) 16:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Image Gallery
Is there a reason why the image gallery was removed? There are several great images that help illustrate the article, such as (Madison getting the brown paper bag treatment, hair cuts etc.) It would be impossible to have all those images throughout the article, without it looking cluttered. Can we please add the image gallery back to the article. StarEnerg (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
Why should i change if it is true from Dinolamb3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinolamb3 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Wrestler images
Where the article is large enough to support more than one, yeah, that's a good point. Sorry I neglected to think of that. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:09, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
re: PW bot
That's great, thanks for doing that. I'm really sorry about the time this is taking, hope you don't mind. I'll try and get the bot running right now :) - Kingpin13 (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- FYI, this task should now be complete, it took the bot three days to do all the tagging, due to AWB messing up a few times. Keep well, - Kingpin13 (talk) 16:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello, your name is brought up to the discussion, so your participation is expected. Thanks.--Caspian blue 17:06, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Music in professional wrestling
Nikki what's up? Why you change it? Talk to me. The King Gemini (talk) 21:39, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
Request deletion
I have found a number of TNA PPV redirects that aren't really needed for the moment since nothing links to them besides a few subpages of mine. They are Destination X (2005), Hard Justice (2005), Against All Odds (2006), Victory Road (2006), Victory Road (2007), and Turning Point (2007). They were created by a number of users and were never expanded so they were redirected. Been meaning to get them deleted, but not until this pasted week when a user created DX and HJ 05 did I remember to ask.--WillC 09:26, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
Your changes to Pete Rose
If you think that the article does not meet the [criteria], please, by all means, change the rating to Start. However, why do you insist on changing only one project? Different projects shouldn't be assessing articles differently; they are the same article following the same criteria. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:23, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- That may be (although this is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit, and not every project has an assessment team like the professional wrestling project). However, Wikipedia uses one assessment scale. That's why WP:ASSESS is there. If you feel that it doesn't meet those criteria, go ahead and downgrade the article to Start (or more appropriately, C-class, due to the amount of information), but your WikiProject assessment scale is a supplement to WP:ASSESS; it does not supersede it. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:28, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, I have read WP:ASSESS; I would appreciate it if you didn't insinuate that I'm unfamiliar with a guideline that I reference. Pardon me if I simply drop this issue as I'm not interested in discussing it further. Do what you want. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from WWE Encyclopedia
Hello Nikki311, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to WWE Encyclopedia has been removed. It was removed by 71.184.42.179 with the following edit summary 'nominator is mistaken, book does pass [[Wikipedia:Notability (books)]]; book is "subject to multiple book reviews" by reliable, third-party sources'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 71.184.42.179 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 19:44, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey Nikki. :) To the best of my recollection, you were the driving force bbehind getting Stacy Keibler (aka Super Stacy!) to GA, so I've listed you accordingly as a main contributor at Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Rosey and The Hurricane/archive1. If I left someone out, please add them in. Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 21:00, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Help
hi ! the RAJUK Uttara Model College has gone through a major makeover and i think it passes B-class criteria but hasn't received any rating yet. will it be possible for you to rate the article and provide suggestions? thanks Souvik.arko (talk) 05:37, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
Notability of popping
The article pop (professional wrestling) is notable because popping is one of the most crucial aspects in wrestling. You probably know that promoters give victories and championships to wrestlers who they think will draw ratings and sell tickets, right? Well, how do promoters gauge a wrestler's potential to do that? I'll tell how: If the fans pop for a wrestler, there's a good chance that they care enough about that wrestler to pay money to see him with a big title. Case in point: Amazing Red. Sure, he's a spot monkey, but he got such good pops from the crowd, that they gave him the X-Division title for it. Also, what about Stone Cold Steve Austin? His raunchy antics excited the crowd so much that he got pushed to superstardom for it.
Popping is how a wrestler's popularity is gauged, and so, it is one of the most crucial aspects of the wrestling business, and therefore, is a very notable topic to write an article about.Wikieditor1988 (talk) 04:31, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
- Then you should also be aware of the ignore all rules rule, which states that the only rule that is absolute is that of consensus. You, and some guy named TruthCrusader, are the only ones I've ever met that didn't seem to think that these terms do not meet that rule. Sure, the most likely place you're going to find these terms is on a wrestling message board, but we're talking about slang; the most reliable way TO verify slang is by hanging out with the people who use it. As a direct result, the rule of what is a reliable source needs to be ignored, per Wikipedia's Ignore All Rules policy. Consensus indicates that these terms, like Pop and Heat, are reliable enough to be cited without sources, and just two people do not overcome consensus.
- Don't believe me? Put up a template proposing that article for deletion, and allow everyone else to contribute their two cents. Once that's all said and done, there won't be any controversy over whether or not the consensus rule applies.Wikieditor1988 (talk) 18:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:40, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
Thought you might like to know
Hi. You gave a Good Article to Shamrock Rovers F.C. last March.[1] I thought you might be interested to know that you are being used by the main author to justify blanket reverts and accusations of vandalism.[2] He cites you a number of times (though not by name) in the discussion here. He seems to think you have given him carte blanche to do what he likes with the article. Scolaire (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh dear! An example of how low some people are prepared to sink. Telling lies behind someone's virtual back, pathetic! Onetonycousins (talk) 23:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
Deletion of UPWA page
I would like the page reinstated. The "discussion" was biased and when I brought up the point of other "notable" sites, i got banned. What's the deal with six people trying to control an open forum?? DonnieB657702 (talk) 00:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
There are lots of faggs in this world, and that's why this word is not an insult attack, so piss off! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigsons (talk • contribs) 13:01, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
GA Sweeps update
Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 90% done with only 226 articles remain to be swept! As always, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. With over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 4 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. As an added incentive, if we complete over 100 articles reviewed this month, I will donate $100 to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps participants. I hope that this incentive will help to increase our motivation for completing Sweeps while supporting Wikipedia in the process. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 00:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Jigsaw (wrestler)
Materialscientist (talk) 18:00, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Re: Linda McMahon
Hey there, Nikki!
I'm Screwball, and I've recognized you as a strong contributor to WP:Professional Wrestling for as long as I've been with the Project. Recently, I've been undertaking a copyedit of the Linda McMahon article, and I would appreciate your help. I am especially having a tough time with her on-screen roles, which seem very in-perspective to me. You've made excellent wrestler biographies on Women's Champions before--please feel free to help edit, add valuable research, and give feedback. As always, I thank you in advance.
Sincerely, --Screwball23 talk 18:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Hey
Nice work with Kong so far. I have your subpage on my watchlist, I have no idea why or how, but nice work.--WillC 02:50, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, well for you to know I'm working on Love and Wilde in two subpages. Yeah, I've noticed that. It will be the next one I take to FL. IWGP Junior Heavyweight Tag Team Championship is still under review and only has one support plus reviewers are very short. So I'm waiting for it to pass before nominating another.--WillC 01:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
- Speaking of women's topics, to make sure List of WWE Women's Champions is still up to date and passes the FL criteria. I thought to tell you I'm going to re-expanded it. Would hate for you to get close with the topic and that come under FLRC and fail. Is that okay with you?--WillC 06:20, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Jim White (wrestler)
Materialscientist (talk) 06:00, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at Wikipedia:The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! --Jayron32 01:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Molly Holly
The link for ref 8 in the Molly Holly article: (http://web.archive.org/web/20070516095522/http://www.pwtorch.com/artman/exec/view.cgi/24/14440. Retrieved 2007-05-12) destroyed my computer with infections, this is not assumption it is fact. You need to either remove it or find an alternate source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.166.214.5 (talk) 12:38, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Replied at your talk page. Nikki♥311 21:48, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Well as soon as that page loaded the virus parade began. Shouldn't you verify the entire link is safe before simply undoing the edits? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacksaturn (talk • contribs) 21:59, 18 January 2010 (UTC) I took your advice and brought it to the talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacksaturn (talk • contribs) 22:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Found an alternate link for the dvd review. See my note at talk page. Blacksaturn 12:25, 19 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blacksaturn (talk • contribs)
- I found the identical article from another source so I made the change on the Nora Greenwald page. And I have been signing my posts with four tildes but I also had the 'sign my name exactly as shown' box checked, with an empty signature...Blacksaturn (talk) 23:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
PW Style Guide
Perhaps you will be interested to know that an administrative determination made by you back in June 2008 [3] was recently reverted eight times during an edit war,[4]. Some of your edit was undone, and the altered version has been page-protected.One Post Otto (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pamela Paulshock
An article that you have been involved in editing, Pamela Paulshock, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pamela Paulshock. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Enric Naval (talk) 01:58, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Your revert at Owen Hart
The fact that the WF Attitude game was dedicated to Owen Hart, is mentioned in the linked-to WF Attitude page in the statemtn, and even if that generally isn't good enough, there are just some things that are just so blatantly obvious that there's really no need to have an inline citation. Do we request a citation on Coca-Cola when it says it is a soft drink? NO! And why not? Because it is blatantly obvious and anyone requesting a source by adding a [citation needed] tag to the statement would be reverted without further notice or question.
But if you really think it needs to be sourced, add a [citation needed] tag instead of reverting. It is not hard to do, just type {{fact}} Easy as that. People who just revert things that aren't sourced simply because they cannot be constructive and find a source for a claim or at least tag it to acknowledge that a citation would be good, are more of a nuisance than a benefit to the Wikipedia project.
You would be best served taking my advice, otherwise I suggest that you stop editing Wikipedia. --BIG FOUR ! ! ! ! 21:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, Nikki, you did some major--and unnecessary--surgery on the Tiffany Million article. There was nothing "libelous" in the material you removed. You simply made a decent article weaker. George415 (talk) 21:49, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Ida Mae Martinez
Wikiproject: Did you know? 06:00, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
February GA Sweeps update
Thanks to everyone's efforts to the GA Sweeps process, we are currently over 95% done with around 130 articles left to be swept! Currently there are over 50 members participating in Sweeps, that averages out to about 3 articles per person! If each member reviews an article once a week this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. At that point, awards will be handed out to reviewers. Per my message last month, although we did not review 100 articles last month, I still made a donation of $90 (we had 90 reviews completed/initiated) to Wikipedia Forever on behalf of all GA Sweeps reviewers. I would like to thank everyone's efforts for last month, and ask for additional effort this month so we can be finished. I know you have to be sick of seeing these updates (as well as Sweeps itself) by now, so please do consider reviewing a few articles if you haven't reviewed in a while. If you have any questions about reviews or Sweeps let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Double knee Backbreaker
Am the innovator of the double knee backbacker ...I first did it to franky armadillo in portland maine 2001 ..I performed the move against one Jonh walters and he began to use it then as i was wreslting in the new jersy area I wrestled Matt striker and he began to use it... —Preceding unsigned comment added by LRubet (talk • contribs) 21:15, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
Luna Vachon
the source for her other granddaughter wasn't allowed. I tried to post it. only source i have (besides myspace and facebook and the blocked source) is this pic. http://hphotos-snc1.fbcdn.net/hs147.snc1/5455_100600753284904_100000049386306_17872_5578617_n.jpg --Krazyj2010 (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Jamie
Double knee Backbreaker
I can provide video tape with time stamp and challenge anyone to come with something similar with earlier ...I invented that move after many hours of training and expermenting...Do i need an affidivid from Matt Striker and John Walters? What Third party is good enough to prove my claim? —Preceding unsigned comment added by LRubet (talk • contribs) 05:16, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Naoki Sano
Looking at the title history, all but the NOAH tournament win would be in the book (since they're pre-2000) so I can probably source all of them later today. MPJ -DK 05:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
- Had time before work so I took care of it, even added a source on the Super-J cup. MPJ -DK 06:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
GA Sweeps Completed!
Thanks to everyone's amazing efforts in February, we have reviewed all of the articles and are now finished with Sweeps! There are still about 30 articles currently on hold, and once those reviews are completed, I will send you a final message about Sweeps process stats including the total number of articles that were passed and failed. If you have one of these open reviews, be sure to update your count when the review is completed so I can compile the stats. You can except to receive your award for reviewing within the next week or two. Although the majority of the editors did not start Sweeps at the beginning in August 2007 (myself included), over 50 editors have all come together to complete a monumental task and improve many articles in the process. I commend you for sticking with this often challenging task and strengthening the integrity of the GA WikiProject as well as the GAs themselves. I invite you to take a break from reviewing (don't want you to burn out!) and then consider returning/starting to review GANs and/or contribute to GAR reviews. With your assistance, we can help bring the backlog down to a manageable level and help inspire more editors to improve articles to higher classes and consider reviewing themselves. Again, thank you for putting up with difficult reviews, unhappy editors, numerous spam messages from me, and taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
MXW Pro Wrestling
I recently wrote a completely revised article concerning MXW Pro Wrestling at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Demanufactured/MXW_Pro_Wrestling_(revised). If this revision satisfies WP:CORP standards regarding sources, I'll go ahead and replace the current article with this version.Demanufactured (talk) 05:43, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
bot creates the page
RE: [5]
The bot will automatically create and add article names to the page. Thank you for your efforts! Okip 04:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Tiger Raj Singh
Materialscientist (talk) 06:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
I am requesting you look at the deletion request for Edward Chastain. Notability is the biggest factor in why it should get deleted. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:30, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Chyna
About the Chyna article... Her name was legally changed to Chyna, which makes it her real and legal name. However, the whole article uses "Laurer"... I'd use Chyna. Israell (talk) 13:46, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Need help with image, thanks
Hi Nikki, I've just uploaded this TV screenshot of the Angle-Puder Incident, and have added the image on two related articles, Daniel Puder and Kurt Angle.
How do I keep this image from being deleted? Gregorynovella (talk) 06:47, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of April. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 200. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. Hope we can see you in April. |
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:00, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
A sincere thank you from Wikiproject Good Articles
On behalf of Wikiproject Good Articles, I would like to express our gratitude to you for your contributions to the Sweeps process, for which you completed 11 reviews. Completion of this monstrous task has proven to be a significant accomplishment not only for our project, but for Wikipedia. As a token of our sincere appreciation, please accept this ribbon. Lara 01:04, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
Request
Hey Nikki. I was wondering if you'd do me a favour. At Template:Portal/images (recently created) there's a list of photos that gets used on the Template:Portal. Each photo corresponds to each wikiproject. For some reason, we (WP:PW) are using File:Pankratiasten in fight copy of greek statue 3 century bC.jpg. Personally, I don't think that a photo of a statue of Greek men wrestling is relevant to pro wrestling, and was hoping you'd change the image to File:WWE ring.jpg, the image we use on the WP:PW talk page template. I'd do it myself, but Template:Portal/images is fully protected. The pro wrestling link is the 7th one down in the edit window, and as far I can tell, you need to change "| Professional wrestling = Pankratiasten in fight copy of greek statue 3 century bC.jpg" to "| Professional wrestling = WWE ring.jpg". Thanks, ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 10:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 13:30, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Hey Nikki
Hey, seeing as you are the only admin in WP:PW, the project would like your help with something. We had a recent discussion about moving Oleg Prudius to Vladimir Kozlov and Chris Mordetzky to Chris Masters, and consensus was achieved at WT:PW. However, I can't make the moves myself nor can any of the other editors because of the lack of an admin. I did go to WP:RM, but I have yet to receive a response. Before the discussions get archived, the project would really appreciate if you could do the moves. Thanks in advance, Nikki! RaaGgio (talk) 01:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks a million, Nikki. Anyway, long time no chat, how are u? RaaGgio (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I'm going to start expanding some more PPV articles soon and well, I failed an RFA the other day and I've been trying to fix up my resumé. Any pointers? RaaGgio (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Edit non-wrestling-related articles? That'll be tough lol. I actually have many interest, but editing wrestling articles seems more fun. What other topics do you like to edit on Wikipedia? RaaGgio (talk) 03:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- I've reviewed several articles for GA like Desperate Housewives, but that was some time ago. I guess I should do more; I plan to renominate myself for RFA in 4-5 months so I have a lot of time to contribute in various parts of Wikipedia. I think I'll start researching the WP:MOS movie regulations and start to edit movie articles. Any particular part of Wikipedia you find the most interesting? RaaGgio (talk) 04:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Edit non-wrestling-related articles? That'll be tough lol. I actually have many interest, but editing wrestling articles seems more fun. What other topics do you like to edit on Wikipedia? RaaGgio (talk) 03:03, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Well, I'm going to start expanding some more PPV articles soon and well, I failed an RFA the other day and I've been trying to fix up my resumé. Any pointers? RaaGgio (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks a million, Nikki. Anyway, long time no chat, how are u? RaaGgio (talk) 03:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Brimstone (wrestler)
An editor has nominated Brimstone (wrestler), an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brimstone (wrestler) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. -Fall Of Darkness (talk)
- User BoosterBronze has added this tag for deletion to the page today, after repeated reverted edits to the article, and after a slight "rant" on the article's talk page. The article itself had been put up for deletion in 2007, and was voted as Keep- in fact, the new deletion tag links straight to the archived page, where BoosterBronze has added their own comment and vote to the already closed discussion. Not sure what to do as far as resolving, or removing the tag myself- any help would be appreciated. -Fall Of Darkness (talk) 00:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Wondering
Not sure if you are still interested. But I find myself wondering what articles to work on these days. We had talked about taking Gail Kim and Jacqueline Moore to GA. Are you up for that?--WillC 04:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sure, do you want to do it in subpage or main article? I usually do subpage because ips like to change everything and I usually rewrite the entire thing.--WillC 21:09, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, several. Take your pick: User:Wrestlinglover/No Surrender (2008), User:Wrestlinglover/Sacrifice (2008), User:Wrestlinglover/Sandbox2, User:Wrestlinglover/Slammiversary (2008), User:Wrestlinglover/TNA Roster, and User:Wrestlinglover/Turning Point (2004). all my other ones are full with either current or future projects. It is rare I have an empty one, but lately I've been trying to get what I have saved already, done.--WillC 05:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Good, I'll do her TNA section today and see what else I can find to do.--WillC 20:28, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, several. Take your pick: User:Wrestlinglover/No Surrender (2008), User:Wrestlinglover/Sacrifice (2008), User:Wrestlinglover/Sandbox2, User:Wrestlinglover/Slammiversary (2008), User:Wrestlinglover/TNA Roster, and User:Wrestlinglover/Turning Point (2004). all my other ones are full with either current or future projects. It is rare I have an empty one, but lately I've been trying to get what I have saved already, done.--WillC 05:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Hey Nikki, I've noticed you have added some more refs. Some of those have been directly from WWE. Due to Kim being covered by alot of reliable websites, can we try to keep the primary refs to as low as possible? Certainly Raw and SD episodes can be covered by third party sites pretty easily.--WillC 03:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry to eavesdrop, but are you sure third-party sites are reliable sources for WWE results? That notion sounds a bit absurd knowing that these third-parties get their information from a fourth-party, and they have no way to confirm what they're reporting to be true. I have read a lot of errors on some third-party results; they could be as minimal as mixing up the moves used in a match, but the reality is that mixing up at least something usually happens in all these results pages. How and why do you consider these to be reliable enough to reference our Wikipedia articles? RaaGgio (talk) 03:58, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, using WWE is not exactly a problem, but according to main MoS, self-published sources, like WWE, should be used on a very rare occasion, and with WWE being the world's largest promotion, this information isn't exactly hard to find. That is just me though. We just have different views. I was just asking.--WillC 05:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
In case you are wondering, to avoid edit conflicts, etc. I am working on the TNA section in a different subpage. Once I have completed rewriting and sourcing it I'll copy and paste it into the article.--WillC 04:24, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
- Good, sorry I fell a bit behind. I was sick for about a week, stuff came up, and the floods in my town have been holding me from advancing. I'll finish my section tonight before I go to sleep. I got some time to kill.--WillC 04:01, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorrry, computer acted up last night, didn't get the chance to finish. I'll finish up the article tonight. Kim and Kong on GAN will be nice.--WillC 20:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, will be done tonight. Maybe the knockout title can be a topic soon. I've got Love and Wilde in subpages. After Kong and Kim become GAs then only ODB and Rayne would be left.--WillC 04:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Sorrry, computer acted up last night, didn't get the chance to finish. I'll finish up the article tonight. Kim and Kong on GAN will be nice.--WillC 20:31, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, I'm very very sorry it is taking me so long with Kim. I have been really drained lately and got so much stuff in real life to do, that when it comes to writing on here. I just don't have the train of thought, etc. I still plan to finish it soon. I got a report to finish today. So maybe by tonight afterwards, I'll get time to finish it.--WillC 21:01, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
I had originally planned it to not take this long. If we do another article in the future, I promise to be done before you are.--WillC 21:22, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
Deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Unreferenced BLPs
Hi Nikki311, this is a message from an automated bot, regarding Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Unreferenced BLPs. You blanked the page and, since you are its sole author, FrescoBot has interpreted it as a request for deletion of the page and asked administrators to satisfy the requests per speedy deletion criterion G7. Next time you want a page that you've created deleted, you can explicitly request the deletion by inserting the text {{db-author}}
. If you didn't want the page deleted, please remove the {{db-author}}
tag from the page and undo your blanking or put some content in the page. Admins are able to recover deleted pages. Please do not contact the bot operator for issues not related with bot's behaviour. To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=FrescoBot}}
somewhere on your talk page. -- FrescoBot (msg) 00:44, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Nikki will you move?
Nikki can you move Chris Parks to Abyss (wrestler) per consensus at WT:PW? Thank you in advance.--The guy dubbed Curtis23 Curtis23's talk 21:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
Nikki will you make a few more moves now that consensus for a move has been achieved in 2 other discussions. These are Rodney Anoa'i → Yokozuna (wrestler) and Carly Colón → Carlito (wrestler)--Curtis23's Usalions 21:29, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter message
It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving.
In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire.
If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list.
If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Protection
Nikki, will you please semi-protect Curt Hawkins and Zack Ryder as IPs come around daily and vandalise the page or add week by week data or add un-needed data.--Curtis23's Usalions 22:16, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- Not done Nikki♥311 20:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
M Rayne
Can you help me fine one? Or maybe just mention it was the move that put an end to the career of Tara? TheiGuard (talk) 20:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheiGuard (talk • contribs)
Hallowicked help
Hi. I'm asking for your help, since I've written a completely new article on Chikara wrestler Hallowicked, but his page is currently protected and can't be edited by anyone other than an admin. His notability was up for discussion in January 2007 and now over three years later I don't think there's any question whether he's notable enough for Wikipedia or not.TheFBH (talk) 15:38, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
- OK, will do, thanks.TheFBH (talk) 02:23, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hey long lost partner in crime :)
Hey Nikki! How are you? I haven't spoken with you since we tried to work on the Pro Wrestling Hall of Fame, sorry for ditching you :( After that project, I lost my time with Wikipedia. I was wondering whether you could use your amazing copyediting skills for 2010 WWE Draft? If you have time, that is. Thank you!--Truco 503 19:08, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Is female wrestler notable? 201.40.157.71 (talk) 05:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Madison Rayne
The move is called Scissor stomp in the reports, since that's what Mike Tenay called it in the broadcast. It's just to indicate that she has used the move more than once.TheFBH (talk) 19:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
DO
|
I see you have signed up for the last dramaout. Consider notifying 3 good editors of this to encourage more participation. Perhaps saying
I am participating in this. Please consider doing the same! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians 15:11, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
Good Article
Isn't this a good article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beautiful_People_(professional_wrestling) —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheiGuard (talk • contribs) 22:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Blue Collar Wrestling Alliance
BCWA has a number of cross referencing sites. What do I need to do to keep it from getting deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kylebrent1861 (talk • contribs) 05:12, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
Facebuster and pumphandle drop revert
Why did you remove my edits to the F-5 and sitout facebuster?
- Without some sort of link to the difs or description of what you added...I don't remember. Nikki♥311 02:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
Deepest Apologies
I'm so very sorry at my lack of work towards completion of Gail Kim. In all honesty, I have really lost all desire to continue writing on wikipedia anymore. With just a faint level of interest left, I've decided to return and finish articles I have created. My first priority is to finish Gail Kim. Just thought to come by and say I am very sorry and that I understand if you never want to work with me again. My deepest apologies Nikki!--WillC 23:54, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- Well thank you Nikki, that means alot coming from you. :) Once I get the chance to return full time like I was, I'll jump back into my old ways. Throwing out PPVs and FLs every week. Maybe you and I can think of something to work on. Probably that Knockout Topic. You got 3 down already, while I have one. With Gail Kim soon to be done, that will leave only 3 left. I already have worked on Love and Wilde, I may be able to pull those out too.--WillC 06:46, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Nikki can you move this page?
We need a move from WWE Hell in a Cell to Hell in a Cell (2009).--Curtis23's Usalions 02:19, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
WWE: Hell in a Cell (2010) needs to be moved
WWE: Hell in a Cell (2010) needs to be moved to WWE Hell in a Cell (2010) I already tried to move it but it needs to be done by any admin.--Steam Iron 02:55, 3 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey I reverted your reverted edit on Steve Austin's neck injury from Owen Hart's piledriver and added a source that stated that the injury contributed to his retirement. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 01:31, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
Parthenon Frieze
Hi. I am finished. Twospoonfuls (ειπέ) 06:12, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your constructive criticism on this article. It's been a pleasure, and an incentive to improve it. Twospoonfuls (ειπέ) 09:06, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Nikki, thanks for your help!!! :-)
I agree the article is not exactly Good Article quality at the moment. My take is that the GAN process is a lot better at bringing in people than the request for peer review. Either way, I want to make my intentions clear that this article is very good for a B article and, with constructive feedback, it could be brought up a rung sometime soon. --Screwball23 talk 19:48, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
I can see you feel that I hurt your feelings and didn't follow your advice. The truth is, from the time you reviewed it, I was overrun by competing priorities. I agreed with some of your advice, and appreciate the time you took to review it. I find no reason why you say I am not open to feedback. I have negotiated points on the page repeatedly, and just because we have differences of opinion doesn't mean your views weren't constructive. --Screwball23 talk 03:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
FINALLY
I have completed the TNA section of Gail Kim in my subpage. Later today I'll look over it and do a quick copyedit then nominate it at GA. Thought to tell you so you could look at it if you wanted. I am very sorry it took me this long Nikki!--WillC 10:04, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
- During my copyedit I noticed a few questionable references. Mainly Gerweck.net and a reference sourcing her eat defeat move. The gerweck one is an interview so I just let it pass. While the eat defeat ref is a forum, but it is the forum to Kim's official site. I'm not sure whether to keep it or remove it when Kim, herself, posted on it stating that was the name of it. What are your thoughts?--WillC 01:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- It either was the space between the url and the title (http://www.wwe.com/shows/wwesuperstars/archive/06032010/ | title=Captain jacked) or that the WWE link wasn't completed. I fixed it. Thanks, I was in the middle of looking through tv reports to see if I could find a replacement. Now I don't have too. Also, what do you think of the BMI reference used to cover her entrance music? I don't know what BMI is.--WillC 02:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Okay, I've been looking for a new reference for the PWI Female 50 for 2008, you know where I can find one?--WillC 04:12, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- It either was the space between the url and the title (http://www.wwe.com/shows/wwesuperstars/archive/06032010/ | title=Captain jacked) or that the WWE link wasn't completed. I fixed it. Thanks, I was in the middle of looking through tv reports to see if I could find a replacement. Now I don't have too. Also, what do you think of the BMI reference used to cover her entrance music? I don't know what BMI is.--WillC 02:38, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Alright, Kim has been moved and nominated. I'm done with my copyedit, etc. Sorry it took me this long to get this done. I should have got it done quicker, seeing as I am the one who came up with the idea. All I need now is a PWI 50 Female reference and it is complete. The one in there I don't think is reliable, but I can't seem to find a good replacement. Well, now in 2 months the article will be reviewed and you'll be one step closer to the WWE Women's Title topic and I'll pull out Wilde and Love so that will mean the Knockouts Title will be close as well. Maybe we can work on Ms. Jackie together? You up for it?--WillC 08:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, that is the problem, I don't know any of the information for it. Like when it was published, its name, etc. I just know there is a list, but not sure which issue. Seeing as alot of sources posted the info in September I would assume either the August or September 08 issue. I feel that WrestleView has the list somewhere on their site since I remember looking at it, but I've looked several times and nothing.--WillC 03:16, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
- Good job on Eddie, the article is looking good.--WillC 05:56, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Though I'd come by and tell you I'm going to work on the List of Divas Champions and have it at FLC by the end of the week. That way your topic will be only one article off.--WillC 06:52, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Norman Biggs
Hi Nikki, I think we are good to go on the Norman Biggs article. I think all main issues have been addressed. Thanks FruitMonkey (talk) 17:18, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- Lots of thanks Nikki, I hope to link up with you again in the future. Massive GA review total by the way, very impressive. FruitMonkey (talk) 22:38, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Keeping Page Active
I am new to Wikipedia contributions and one my pages has come up for deletion for a second time, TAJJ Championship Wrestling. I am wondering how to keep it active as I am unsure what to do next.
Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.64.74.223 (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Move request
May you move WWE Tag Team Championship (2002-2010) to WWE Tag Team Championship (its okay to get rid of the disambiguation its not needed anymore), and move WWE Tag Team Championship (2010-present) to Unified WWE Tag Team Championship. These changes need to be reflected in which the company decided to continue the lineage of its original 2002 title. Thank you. I asked another admin, but since you know more of pro wrestling, maybe you can get to it fast than they can? --Truco 503 20:20, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
Appalachian Championship Wrestling page up for deletion???!!!
As the creator of this page, what can I do to ensure the page isn't deleted?