User talk:Notque

I like Toast.

hey! state terrorism by the united states may be of interest to you. best. BernardL 03:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC) Thanks for your message and nice recent work on the "politics" page.BernardL 21:59, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism of Noam Chomsky article

This isn't the first time that this has happened. You might be interested in seeing this. [1] I'll ask User:Cadr to review the issue as he is a linguist familiar with Chomsky's scholarly work. Thank you.--Jersey Devil 08:47, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

you rock —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.94.105.238 (talk) 20:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Smith

I'm very pleased to be your first personal example of WP:AGF in action :). It was completely obvious that your edits were not vandalism, due in large part to the thoughtful edit summaries you used (and it certainly didn't hurt that you added a whole section of sourced content). Too often people attack those editors they disagree with instead of working together, or even trying to work together. In case you can't tell I'm a big fan of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. And I'm very glad that you are a helpful and reasonable person to deal with; I've had more than a few editors that have tested the limits of my assumption of good faith. Keep up the good work :). -FrankTobia (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey!

Howzit going? Just a quick note to let you know that I am reviewing the situation.BernardL (talk) 05:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response

Just saw your message on my talk page and I just have to say that I am not all that familiar with the historical background of libertarianism so I might not be much of a help in that regard. However if edit warring on that article gets out of hand just tell me and I'll try and take care of it but try and settle any content disputes on the talk page because no one benefits from edit wars. Thanks.--Jersey Devil (talk) 06:07, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Smith II

Q, I just now noticed that you had posted a wonderfully reasoned response to my post. I hadn't looked over there, and was unaware that I had failed to respond. Anyway, I am unable at this time to devote the time necessary to give a response. Unfortunately, the time that I usually compose such discussive comments is the weekend, and this weekend, I will be without computer access. I really appreciate the time you took to compose your response; I want to mull it over and give your comments as much respect as they deserve by providing a good response on my part. I will do this, but it could easily be ten days before I can. Until then, all the best. Unschool (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Libertarian Principles needs work

As I wrote on libertarianism talk, especially in the principles section, feel free to suggest how to integrate anti-property libertarian principles with pro-property ones. Although I have hung out with leftist libertarian/anarchist/syndicalist/communists on and off for 30 years, I would not try to describe their views/principles since really don't have knowledge or energy to defend anything I said against disagreements. It probably needs to be a shorter section with links to various theorists. I was going to clean up the movement stuff first. Carol Moore 03:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Carolmooredc {talk}

Speedy deletion nomination of Deeproute

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Deeproute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Timneu22 · talk 18:59, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not your personal webspace, and it's not a place to write how-to articles, either. WP:NOT. — Timneu22 · talk 18:59, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intention of making a how-to article, or personal webspace. It's a legitimate article, and many other simulated sports websites have wikipedia pages. If you disagree with particular content, please point it out so it can be edited. q (talk) 19:41, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deeproute for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Deeproute, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deeproute until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Timneu22 · talk 18:13, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]