Jump to content

Euro Quebec Hydro Hydrogen Project

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GoingBatty (talk | contribs) at 06:25, 28 November 2010 (Typo fixing and general fixes, typos fixed: an highly → a highly, removed stub tag using AWB (7424)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

The Euro Quebec Hydro Hydrogen Project or EQHHP (also known as Euro Quebec Hydro Hydrogen Pilot Project or EQHHPP) was a 100 MW pilot project to study the shipping of Canadian hydropower converted via electrolysis into hydrogen and the shipping of the hydrogen to Hamburg, Germany.[1][2]. The time frame of phase B was 1992 to 1997.[3].

The method of transport is a hydrogen tanker that carries smaller highly insulated hydrogen tanks filled with liquid hydrogen.

The Euro-Quebec Hydro-Hydrogen Project has been promoted since the early 1990s and is a well thought out proposal for the practical and economic transport of large quantities of liquid hydrogen by sea. As the name indicates the proposal is to transport by sea hydrogen manufactured in Quebec, Canada to Europe, initially Hamburg in Germany. The hydrogen is to be manufactured by the electrolysis of water using hydroelectricity.

Using relatively cheap hydroelectricity in Quebec the resulting cost of the liquid hydrogen delivered to a port in Europe is similar to the cost of liquid hydrogen manufactured in Europe using electricity generated using offshore wind power. (see below). It is important that hydrogen is made from non-fossil fuel sources if it is to be promoted as a clean fuel and diverse supplies give security of supply. The proposed method of transport is as follows:

The transport uses the concept of a "mother ship" that carries smaller barges each of which is a highly insulated hydrogen tank. The barges are filled with liquid hydrogen and the "mother ship" is ballasted to pass under the barges to facilitate loading and unloading. Each barge is 29m long by 18m wide carrying an insulated tank 15m diameter by 22m long overall dimensions which will hold 200 tons of liquid hydrogen. The first proposal "mother ship" carrying 5 barges will be 180m long by 29m wide. Using barges greatly facilitates storage at each end of the journey and makes possible a quick turnaround of the "mother ship" as with container ships.

The following is a guide as to the quantities of hydrogen that might be shipped.

In the UK the total amount of diesel used by buses and coaches is approximately one million tons per year. The energy density of hydrogen is approximately 3 times that of diesel and hydrogen-powered fuelcell buses with regenerative braking operating in cities have approximately 3.3 times the fuel utilisation efficiency of diesel buses under the same operating conditions. Therefore if 1/3 of the UK buses and coaches operate under city driving conditions that favour hydrogen power then the amount of hydrogen required will be 1,000,000 / 3 x 3.3 x 3 = approx. 34,000 tons per year.

If all this hydrogen came from Quebec it would require: 34,000 / 200 = 170 barge trips (i.e. 200 tons per barge ). The "mother ship" described above is the proposed prototype carrying 5 barges and subsequent ships will be larger. If second generation "mother ships" carry 10 barges ( 2,000 tons of hydrogen ) this corresponds to 17 round trips per year which allows 365 / 17 = 22 days per round trip. Allow 6 days in port per trip, so the sailing time is 16 days for a round trip of 8,000 miles, this corresponds to a ship speed of 8,000 / 16 x 24 x 1.25 = 17 knots which is reasonable for an ocean freight ship.

As a further guide to the possible permutations of world trade in liquid hydrogen the total transport use of petroleum products in the UK excluding aircraft, is approximately 36 million tons. Assuming hydrogen power is 2.5 times more energy efficient than diesel or petrol averaged over all transport applications, then the quantity of hydrogen required to replace petroleum would be:

36,000,000 / 3 (energy density factor) x 2.5 (fuel utilisation factor) = 4,800,000 tons. If we imported say 10 % of this from say North Africa to secure diversity of supplies, (see solar-photo-voltaic ( PV ) electricity generated in North Africa ) using "mother ships" carrying say 20 barges (i.e. 4000 tons ) then the number of ships required would be as follows:

Quantity of liquid hydrogen for 10% of UK transport use of energy = 4,800,000 / 10 = 480,000 tons per year

Number of barge trips = 480,000 / 200 = 2,400 per year

Number of voyages by a "mother ship" carrying 20 barges = 2,400 / 20 = 120 per year

Return voyage from North Africa to UK is 4,500 miles. Ship speed is 17 knots

Therefore sailing time for round trip = 4,500 / 17 x 24 x 1.25 = 9 days

Allow 5 days in port, therefore total round trip time = 14 days

Therefore number of ships required = 120 x 14 / 365 = 5 "mother ships"

As can be seen this is a realistic scheme in terms of the number and size of ships required to meet a market need and illustrates the likely viability of a world wide trade in liquid hydrogen developing to distribute hydrogen production to the best locations for the production of clean renewable electricity. The world trade in hydrogen will also moderate prices and ensure security of supply.

Comparison of the costs of UK offshore-wind-power produced hydrogen and hydrogen from Quebec.

With the benefit of 'Green Certificates' and continuous production using offshore wind power the cost of producing hydrogen by the electrolysis of water will be approximately �20 per Gigajoule delivered by pipeline (see offshore wind power).

The additional cost of a liquid hydrogen delivery system over a gas pipeline system is mainly due to the extra cost of liquefying the hydrogen. The liquefaction process will require 29% more electricity over the electrolysis requirement and so the liquid hydrogen will cost approximately 1 / ( 1.0 - 0.29 ) = 1.4 times the cost of hydrogen as a gas. So the cost of liquid hydrogen produced using offshore generated electricity will be: 1.4 x �20 = �28 per Gigajoule = 2.8 pence per Megajoule.

The Euro-Quebec Hydro-Hydrogen Project is described in detail in a paper presented to the "Low Temperature Engineering and Cryogenics Conference" 13–15 July 1992, held in Southampton, England, entitled "Euro-Quebec Hydro-Hydrogen Project (EQHHPP): a challenge to cryogenic technology" by G. Giacomazzi and J Gretz Copyright 1993 Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. ref: 0011-2275/93/080767-05

According to this paper the cost of liquid hydrogen from Quebec, using hydroelectricity costing 2 cents ECU per kWh, landed in Hamburg, Germany is approx. 15 cents ECU per kWh energy content.

1 kWh = 3.6 Megajoules.

�1 = 60 cents ECU (at the time of the publication of the paper)

Therefore cost of liquid hydrogen from Quebec

= 0.15 x 0.60 x 100 / 3.6 = 2.5 pence per Megajoule

The paper further states that doubling the cost of the electricity increases the cost of the hydrogen by only 20%.

As can be seen the cost of Quebec liquid hydrogen and offshore-generated-electricity liquid hydrogen are similar at approximately 2.8 pence and 2.5 pence per Megajoule so the two sources of supply are interchangeable.

See also

References