User talk:HJ Mitchell/Alternate

This page serves as an alternative to my main talk page. I may move lengthy or less urgent conversations here in order to make the orange bar less frequent. This talk page is also unprotected. If you can't post to my main talk page because it is protected, leave your message here. I will reply here and alert you on your own talk page.

Hello there and welcome to HJ's talk page! If you're here because I left a message on your talk page, please reply there and leave {{Tb|"Your Username"|"Name of the section"}} in a new section here but please leave a time stamp (~~~~~) so the bot can archive it! I will endeavour to do the same for you unless you request otherwise, you're here to point me to a discussion elsewhere, or I know you're watching this page but I have been known to forget, so you might want to check back if you don't receive a timely response! If you have a question, ask me. If I know the answer, I'll tell you, if I don't, I'll find out, then we'll have both learned something! Above all, whatever I did, please know that I meant it in good faith and please keep it civil.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

AfC submissions
Random submission

2+ months

1,781 pending submissions

Purge to update

Requesting that AAFM American Academy of Financial Management be removed from Wiki

AAFM needs to be protected from spam or removed from WIKI because editor RJC : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:RJC and others keep deleting the US government citations and regulatory references that define the group accurately. Not sure with the NPOV bias is about, but the Investopedia definition and FINRA USA regulatory definition are accurate, and the RJC and latest version is a spam blog. Moreover, the AAFM is a simple group which offers post doctorate law school courses where Mr. RJC, PhD may have some type of resentment or conflict against AAFM or the law school because of his competing university employment? or his non-affiliation or non-recognition from AAFM. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.144.184 (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well it looks from here like you're trying to turn the article into an advert and you're refusing to discuss the concerns raised by other editors. If you have a suggestion make it on the talk page and wait for discussion. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:44, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would support the removal of AAFM from WIKI as Non-notable WP:CORP; no independent coverage beyond trivial or incidental mentions. This company is part of a string for-profit certification boards owned by the same individual probably IP 98.196.144.184 Dickietr (talk) 15:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism Accusation

Why you revert my recent edit to the Midnight Son's Talk page?

Deletion of Mt. Vernon Sleep Galleries

Mr. Mitchell,

I have previously been through the necessary requirements and relevant sources with one of your coworkers regarding the Mt. Vernon Sleep Galleries. I understand the process of proposed deletion and the seven day window; however I was unaware the the page had been actually proposed for deletion and did not object. What are my options at the moment for getting the page reinstated. The page contains relevant links from A national vendor (Simmons) and newspaper links that specifically mention the Store and owner as well. I was under the impression that we had the necessary sources to be considered relevant so please let me know what else needs to be done. 76.120.251.33 (talk) 17:28, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still awaiting a replay from you, sir. 21:20, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Help with redirect

I'm not to experienced with this. Before I take this any further could I get your opinion (I see you helping on the #RR board).

I'm having trouble on Utah Territory's At-large congressional district page. See page history and talk page. I'm I correct about the redirect? What else can I do better to get my point across? Bgwhite (talk) 02:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there! And thank you!

I appreciate very much your decision in Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#Dead_Frontier. It gave me a whole new meaning and understanding on how Wikipedia works, but I didn't know it would be so hard to prove things around here. I also don't clearly understand why there are so many articles that don't have to go through the discussion I have to participate right now Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dead_Frontier_(2nd_nomination)#Dead_Frontier? Do you have any advice to avoid this next time I try to create an article? It would ease my mind a lot. Thanks, --WizTheDoc (talk) 20:18, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]