Talk:Beautiful

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation

Redirect to Stripped (2002 album)

I'm redirecting this to Stripped (2002 album) because "Beautiful" is one of the songs on Stripped. --KelisFan2K5 23:50, 7 Mar 2005 (UT

Romeo, Romeo, wherefore art thou Romeo?

Hopefully not vandalizing this article or the talk page! Please don't add content about random non-notable individuals you think are beautiful to this or any other wikipedia page. I guarantee, she's not impressed, and if you continue such activity, your account will be blocked. Thank you! Steve Carlson^Talk 05:44, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki

Could someone add fr:Beautiful as an interwiki, please? Since it is protected, I cannot do it myself. 83.196.180.83 (talk) 21:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit notice debate

The edit notice for this page is currently subject to a deletion debate. The edit notice is the message that appears just over the edit box whenever the page itself is in edit mode. If you love this notice, hate it, or just would like to comment on it's existance, please come and join in the debate. - TexasAndroid (talk) 13:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Semiprotection review

03:03, 5 June 2008 Anonymous Dissident protected Beautiful ‎ (whilst it isn't *constantly* bombarded, almost every IP and new user edit is vandalism. It can be uprotected at a later date if deemed necessary. [edit=autoconfirmed:move=autoconfirmed])

That was sixteen months ago. I'd like to review this to see if semiprotection is still considered necessary. As well as welcoming the views of other editors I have contacted Anonymous Dissident, the protecting admin. --TS 09:55, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think an unprotection for the article seems reasonable at this time. I would still want to wait for Anonymous Dissident to comment in case I or others may have missed something. Best regards, --Kanonkas : Talk 10:00, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

comment copied from user talk:Anonymous Dissident. --TS 10:18, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I make a motion to protect this article again. The vandalism is already starting to get ridiculous since it was unprotected. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Arrgh, the edits are back and it's JUST SO HILARIOUS. Not. Again almost every IP and new user edit is vandalism. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 20:49, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In film...

Broken link for 2009 film "Beautiful" should point to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beautiful_(2009_film). Can't edit page because it's protected, anyone else can? Jonnyboy6 (talk) 20:50, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. - Doctorx0079 (talk) 22:31, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request from Kflat929, 9 November 2010

{{edit semi-protected}} meghan heyduk

Kflat929 (talk) 20:45, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not done very unclear the intention of the request The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]