Jump to content

Talk:Hero (Mariah Carey song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Petergriffin9901 (talk | contribs) at 10:24, 17 December 2010 (Its one of Carey's biggest songs). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconR&B and Soul Music B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template:WikiProject X Factor

WikiProject iconSongs B‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
WikiProject iconMariah Carey B‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mariah Carey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mariah Carey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:HeroSample.ogg

Image:HeroSample.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


éirígí Alternative Video

I added the following information in relation to a cover of the song/x factor version. It is perfectly legitimate material, relevant to both the original song and the x factor cover and is fully cited/referenced. It should not be removed on the grounds of "propaganda" as attempted by some british users as it's as neutral/unbiased as the x factor's Help for "heroes" release and doing so would be unfair and potentially libelous to wikipedia as it would indicate bias/censorship.

On the 14th of December 2008, Irish political party éirígí released an alternative video to the X Factor's "Hero" release on their website.[1] In a statement on their website, the party claimed that "In response to the release of the X Factor’s ‘Hero’ in support of Britain’s occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq éirígí has compiled an alternative video highlighting the true nature of modern day imperialism".[2] The video was removed from various video hosting sites in the days following its release.[3]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.81.139 (talk) 10:54, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything on Wikipedia has to adhere to the basic policies, the five pillars. Everything must be verifiable, neutral and ultimately relevant to the article at hand. One of the key guidelines that governs Wikipedia is notability, is what is being included notable and relevant to the article at hand. Does it give sufficient weight? In an article about a Mariah Carey song, is it relevant to include a parody of a cover? No, it isn't, it is completely undue weight. Quote from WP:UNDUE "Keep in mind that in determining proper weight we consider a viewpoint's prevalence in reliable sources, not its prevalence among Wikipedia editors." I can see no reliable source that discusses this video, its effects, or its viewpoint. Woody (talk) 15:15, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note, left note at WT:MILHIST, WP:SONGS, WP:NIR for wider discussion. Regards, Woody (talk) 15:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Woody is correct. I have removed the section and protected the article. I also commend Woody in bringing the dispute to the attention of the projects. If the anonymous editor can show that that version has been mention in reliable, independent sources, then it can be mention with due weight. Until then, the two 'references' were pretty unconvincing: one was basically 'get this as much as possible on the internet..." The JPStalk to me 15:35, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It's fine that it's mentioned in the éirígí article, but not that much here. It can be briefly pointed out that there's a parody and a link to the respective part of the éirígí article. This could be done via the see also section. Wandalstouring (talk) 16:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Coming at this from the MilHist side I'd agree that inclusion of any commentary lends undue weight to the opinion of a small group, although mention is probably reasonable on the page related to that group. That said I think that the proposed wording has an inherent bias and should probably be moderated anyway.
In addition I think that the current discussion of the X factor rendition is excessive, the level of detail is unnecessary with a blow by blow account of each performers contribution each time it's been performed. I would say that probably also falls under the undue weight consideration as well. I'd recommend a serious culling, probably bringing the substantive content down to no more than a paragraph.
ALR (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Just pop my head in; I think Woody et al have done the right thing in this situation. With no reliable sources, there shouldn't be a section on the video. Skinny87 (talk) 17:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

X factor release -- Hero (X Factor release

As a result of discussion above, and out of common sense, I have copied over the contents of the Hero cover bit to Hero (X Factor release). As this page is protected, it would be a breach of policy to remove it from this article without a consensus. Can I go ahead and remove it all from this article and create a stub paragraph? Regards, Woody (talk) 17:40, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]