User talk:Agcala~enwiki

Welcome to Wikipedia, Agcala~enwiki

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some handy tips:

You can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~
Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

Jokermage ^{"Timor Mentum Occidit"} 21:01, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Agora (W3C Project)

A tag has been placed on Agora (W3C Project) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 15:53, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Agora (W3C Project), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Erik the Red 2 ~~~~ 16:41, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Varela project unrelated to Honduras

The section you added to the article on Honduras about the Varela project is interesting in relation to the paragraph immediately preceding it. However, it does not relate to the topic of the article. Cuba resists constitutional change; OK. But next to nobody would compare those who resist overt constitutional change in Honduras (that is, the anti-Zelaya faction) to the Cubans, or claim that Zelaya resists constitutional change. So the metaphor has nowhere to go. I am removing it for a second time from the article. Regards, Homunq (talk) 00:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message

Thanks for your message, but what article were you talking about? Graham87 02:10, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of "List of First Ladies of Cuba"

The article "List of First Ladies of Cuba" has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Pointless list, possible POV-pushing

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LordPistachio ^talk 17:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a List of First Ladies of the Soviet Union, a List of First Ladies of Brazil, a List of the Czechoslovak and Czech First Ladies, a List of First Ladies of France and even a List of First Ladies of Turkey, so why not Cubans. And what kind of POV would I be pushing, these people existed, did they not?