User talk:DollyD

Blocked

Your recent actions clearly violate the terms of your unblock. Brandon (talk) 10:59, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

DollyD (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done absolutely nothing wrong. My only recent action has been to vote in an RfA of MZMcBride, an editor I admire. I am not an alternate account of MZMcBride. I have not abused any multiple accounts and find this accusation rather tiresome. DollyD (talk) 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have done absolutely nothing wrong.  My only recent action has been to vote in an RfA of MZMcBride, an editor I admire.  I am not an alternate account of MZMcBride.  I have not abused any multiple accounts and find this accusation rather tiresome.  [[User:DollyD|DollyD]] ([[User talk:DollyD#top|talk]]) 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)  |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have done absolutely nothing wrong.  My only recent action has been to vote in an RfA of MZMcBride, an editor I admire.  I am not an alternate account of MZMcBride.  I have not abused any multiple accounts and find this accusation rather tiresome.  [[User:DollyD|DollyD]] ([[User talk:DollyD#top|talk]]) 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)  |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have done absolutely nothing wrong.  My only recent action has been to vote in an RfA of MZMcBride, an editor I admire.  I am not an alternate account of MZMcBride.  I have not abused any multiple accounts and find this accusation rather tiresome.  [[User:DollyD|DollyD]] ([[User talk:DollyD#top|talk]]) 11:10, 22 December 2010 (UTC)  |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

On closer inspection

This user who blocked me was a checkuser, so they could clearly see that I haven't abused any accounts if they took the time. Very disappointing. DollyD (talk) 11:14, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I blocked you specifically on CheckUser evidence. Brandon (talk) 11:16, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]