Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/C. George Boeree
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Courcelles (talk | contribs) at 05:04, 4 January 2011 (Closing debate, result was delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 05:04, 4 January 2011 by Courcelles (talk | contribs) (Closing debate, result was delete)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Courcelles 05:04, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- C. George Boeree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Nonnotable professor. No independent references. No noted achievements. The mentioned conlang is itself nonnotable. Kaligelos (talk) 02:30, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not even close to meeting WP:PROF. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence of passing any of the criteria of WP:PROF. There are a few hits for him in Google news, but I don't think they discuss him in sufficiently non-trivial detail to pass WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no actual publication besides his thesis and some online workbooks.Disgracefully, it's been here since 2007. DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi! A friend told me you want to delete "me". That's fine with me. But in defense of my work, the online textbooks are not workbooks but full-fledged textbooks used in many colleges around the world. Plus, "Personality Theories" may actually have been the first totally free, no advertisements, textbook ever (1997), predating Wikipedia. Oddly, Wikipedia references my textbooks once in a while (no, I didn't do it myself!). But I know, you don't get famous (or rich) by giving things away for nothing, so delete away! :-) Cgboeree (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.