Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/WikiMembers10
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by One (talk | contribs) at 20:22, 5 January 2011 (no). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.
Final (0/3/0); ended 20:22, 5 January 2011 - closed by One per WP:NOTNOW - One two three... 20:22, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination
WikiMembers10 (talk · contribs) – YOUR DESCRIPTION OF THE USER User:WikiMembers10 03:37, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Questions for the candidate
Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. Please answer these questions to provide guidance for participants:
- 1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?
- A: i would like to attend working on video game articles and clean any mess up on the articles.--User:WikiMembers10 03:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- 2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?
- A: Probably List of Pokémon: Indigo League episodes or Eustache Marcadé thay are the most infomation i have put into an article.--User:WikiMembers10 03:50, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- 3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- A: no im fine against other users when thay put up false infomation i tell them off and get there facts right.--User:WikiMembers10 03:43, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
General comments
- Links for WikiMembers10: WikiMembers10 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)
- Edit summary usage for WikiMembers10 can be found here.
Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review his contributions before commenting.
Discussion
RfA/RfB toolbox | |
|---|---|
| Counters | |
| Analysis | |
| Cross-wiki | |
Support
Oppose
- Oppose Sorry, nine days and 106 edits is way too few to be considered as an administrator. Please try again in a few months after we can see a more complete record of contributions to the encyclopedia. NawlinWiki (talk) 03:55, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Per NawlinWiki but would prefer more than a few months to elapse... Peridon (talk) 14:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Obviously not at all ready for adminship yet. —Half Price 20:21, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral
- The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.