Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reactions to shooting of Gabrielle Giffords

Reactions to shooting of Gabrielle Giffords

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I understand that this was created as a fork from 2011_Tucson_shooting#Reactions because the section was too long, but it seems the solution here is to pare down the content. Quoting a long list of politicans' reactions doesn't seem particularly useful or encyclopedic. VQuakr (talk) 23:07, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, or Merge with the main article. If length is a problem, the list can be pared down. Nakon 23:08, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into the shooting article. 65.94.44.243 (talk) 23:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per nom. Kelly ^hi! 23:09, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge I completely agree, especially since all of these quotes are nearly identical. --Muboshgu (talk) 23:10, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge back into 2011 Tucson shooting. There is no need for a separate article on the reactions of the earlier shooting today, this is disproportionate to similar incidents. This reeks of a high level of recentism. –MuZemike 23:10, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree, WP:NOTNEWS, a list of reactions from important figures in the main article is enough.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 23:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Main article is not too big to hold this information. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:11, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Merging would be EDIT WARRING. Already people have said to cut it out of the shooting article citing this sub-article. Hakkapeliitta (talk) 23:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to the main article. (WP:NOTNEWS) Not all of these quotes are needed but we can definitely add some of them. WE are currently discussing the matter over at the main pages' talk page.--White Shadows ^{We live in a beautiful world} 23:12, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and trim as needed. These things settle out over time, but it's a good deal easier to manage if it's all in one place. Antandrus (talk) 23:13, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]