Premo v. Moore
| Premo (for Oregon State Penitentiary) v. Moore | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Decided January 19, 2011 | |
| Full case name | Premo, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary v. Moore |
| Case history | |
| Prior | Appeal from order of habeas relief by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit |
| Subsequent | Reversed and remanded. |
| Holding | |
| Habeas relief may not be granted with respect to any claim a state-court has found on the merits unless the state-court decision denying relief involves an "unreasonable application" of "clearly established federal law, as determined by" the Court. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | Kennedy, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor |
| Concurrence | Ginsburg |
| Laws applied | |
| 6th Amendment, 5th Amendment, right to adequate assistance of counsel, habeas corpus | |
 | This case law article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
  | This article relating to law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |