Jump to content

User talk:69.228.90.50

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 69.228.90.50 (talk) at 03:28, 28 January 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

January 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elockid (Talk) 02:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

69.228.90.50 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

AussieLegend is a vandal and thinks my edits are foolish when it is true editing due to a line change by Disney due to SPongeboob showing a new episode at the same time

Decline reason:

Because you chose name-calling and disruptive editing instead of reasonable discussion, your edits are not making the encyclopedia better. I tried to respond to your unblock request, but because you were rapidly making disruptive edits, I had to disable your talk page access in order to edit your talk page without an edit conflict. Your talk page access with become active again when your block expires. At that time, if you'd like to discuss your desired edits politely, you are welcome to do so. In the meantime, it might be helpful to familiarize yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source guidelines. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 02:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:69.228.90.50&oldid=410498258"