Talk:Rachael Heyhoe Flint
Appearance
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Biography: Science and Academia / Sports and Games Start‑class | |||||||||||||
|
Cricket Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
Please see non-copyvio at Rachael_Heyhoe-Flint/Temp. -- ALoan (Talk) 12:52, 2 November 2005 (UTC)
- Temp page moved to main article. RedWolf 07:28, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
Requested move
It has been proposed in this section that Rachael Heyhoe Flint be renamed and moved to Rachael Heyhoe Flint, Baroness Heyhoe Flint. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Rachael Heyhoe Flint → Rachael Heyhoe Flint, Baroness Heyhoe Flint.
- Oppose - Known widley as a Cricketer and not as a Peer. Known widely by her untitled name and no disambiguation for the article title is required.--Lucy-marie (talk) 14:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Support. WP:NCPEER is quite clear. This peeress is no longer wholly or exclusively known by her pre-peerage nomenclature. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose, this proposed title sounds quite nonsensical and pointless. Again, as with all of these proposed changes (and it's disappointing to see Kitty making these kinds of moves unilaterally knowing them to be controversial, without proposing them first), if WP:NCPEER is telling us to do them like this, it simply shows that there's something wrong with WP:NCPEER, it doesn't carry any weight as an argument.--Kotniski (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose in the strongest possible terms for consistency in naming per policy and guidelines like WP:COMMONNAME, WP:TITLE, WP:D and WP:PRECISION that apply to all Wikipedia article titles. The subject is most commonly known by the current title; adding peerage information is additional precision that is completely unnecessary, all good reasons to ignore WP:NCPEER. --Born2cycle (talk) 20:15, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- Start-Class biography (sports and games) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (sports and games) articles
- Sports and games work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class cricket articles
- Mid-importance cricket articles
- Start-Class cricket articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Cricket articles
- Requested moves