Jump to content

User talk:Raul-Reus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Raul-Reus (talk | contribs) at 13:55, 3 February 2011 (→Orphaned non-free image File:Sat.1 broadcaster mini.png). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Estoy de acuerdo. He puesto en la tabla clasificatoria compartiendo posición a aquellos equipos que tengan los mismos puntos en el fair-play para hacerlo más justo :) Qampunen (talk) 17:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010–11 Valencia CF season

Hello friend, I want to thank you for creating this page and updating it throughout the season. I will try to chip in whenever possible as Valencia is my favorite Club. However I have a question, Why is Soldado listed as the top scorer? He scored only in the pre-season friendlies and I do not think those matches count towards goal totals or any kind of statistics. Take care. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.218.244 (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am just looking at other teams seasons like Real Madrid and Barcelona who do not count pre-season friendlies statistics. I agree it is not a very important thing. I just though I'd point it out in an effort to standardize Spanish clubs seasons pages. Once again, great work on the Valencia page! Cheers. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.156.218.244 (talk) 21:32, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Commons

I tried my best to explain you the sittuation. I dont expect beeing insulted for that on my talkpage.

  • It was YOU who tagged your own upload with commons:Template:Fair use - that template is a request for imidiate deletion of the upload, your request was fulfilled.
  • It was you who not read what Commons is. Commons is a project for free content only(!), a projet that not allows for fair use in any form as e.g. Wikipedia allows. Uploads that are not free content will get deleted on Commons. I explained this to you.

Also Wikipedia is a free content project (the free encyclopedia), but Wikipedia allows for fair use. You can upload logos here on this project, en.wikipedia.org, with a {{Non-free use rationale}}. As a courtesy I already copy&pasted the file description on your talkpage so you can copy&paste it again. Uploading files with non-free use rationals is what you tried on Wikimedia Commons where it is forbidden. This simple to understand information is clearly written in all basic instructions on Commons, including the upload form that you used - so the information was written directly in front of your nose and you completely failed to read it. You can not read but you can insult people... great. Good bye. --Martin H. (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know very well that Commons must be only about free media ARE YOU VERY SURE THAT I CAN'T REALISE THAT SITUATION? DO YOU THINK THAT PERSONS WHICH COLLABORATE 5 YEARS AGO CAN'T REALISE THAT?, and I know that for non free logos can be specified a Template for non rationale use of non-free media, I put these Template and I comply with all conditios to accept a non free imnage: low resolution, and others specifications as other persons puts others non free media. But you ignore all conditions and my efforts to comply all requirements. Elche CF logo was like a own work, but you delete this without any check about this. Finally, I realise that Commons are administred by dictatorships like you which can't let collaborate new people. My only labour on Wikipedia is collaborate and help others to make a Wikipedia which can edit everybody contrutively, not for damage actions of others like you. Bye bye, don't move from Brazil!!
Moved that back from my talkpage. Again, you dont understand:
and I know that for non free logos can be specified a Template for non rationale use of non-free media
NO !, this works on Wikipedia but not on Commons! Commons not allows any non free media, without any exceptions! Damn! Read the commons:Commons:First steps please!
  • English Wikipedia = en.wikipedia.org = Logos are OK, fair use is allowed
  • Commons = commons.wikimedia.org = Different project, Logos are NOT OK!!!!! fair use is forbidden.
Please do me the favor and klick on commons:Template:Fair_use/es. Dont you understand that you selected the wrong project for your logo upload? Other logos are NOT upload to Commons but here, localy, on Wikipedia. File:Elche Club de Fútbol.png is not a file on Commons but Wikipedia! You can upload files here under fair use, but you can not upload any non-free files to Commons! Dont you understand? --Martin H. (talk) 18:59, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. As I said: you find the file description inside the collapsible wrapper on commons:User_talk:Raul-Reus#Re: Football logos. If you use/copy&paste that templates on Wikipedia it will show up correctly, on Commons the templates lead to speedy deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 19:32, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Respuesta

Hola REUS, VASCO de Portugal al habla,

sí, de acuerdo, tengo que mejorar mis sumarios, eso es cierto. También es cierto que soy un poco perfeccionista, no es una escusa para mis modos en algunas situaciones, no señor.

Perdona por las molestias que te haya podido ocasionar, saludos y buena semana. Hasta otra - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 21:12, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mil gracias

Hola, Raúl. Durante las últimas tres temporadas actualizaba Primera, Segunda, Segunda B, Tercera, Copa del Rey, mercados de fichajes... cada semana sin retrasos la mayoría de las veces que me era posible. Por circunstancias me resulta imposible editar estos últimos meses y espero volver pronto. Sólo quiero agradecerte el gran trabajo que estás haciendo con la Primera División y la Segunda División. He intentado ver qué ha cambiado en el artículo pero hay ciertas cosas que resultan incómodas de editar con numerosos templates. Me agrada mucho saber que hay gente dedicada como tú a actualizar lo que uno hacía hace tiempo. Lo dicho, sigue así y puede que pronto podamos actualizar el fútbol español con la mitad de trabajo y de forma muy eficiente. Mil gracias, y no te preocupes que el Gimnástic seguro que se salva! Qampunen (talk) 22:15, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes, entiendo perfectamente lo del Zamora. Simplemente hago el 73,7% de los partidos que se han jugado para ponerlos. Es más justo. Marca solía poner los que más partidos habían jugado hasta que cumpliesen 28 partidos. Lo corregiré enseguida. En cuanto a lo del fair-play, ¿se ordenan acorde a lo que calculamos nosotros o a lo que calcula la RFEF? Gracias, y haré lo mismo para el Zamora en Segunda División. Mis disculpas. Qampunen (talk) 11:35, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias por explicarme cómo llegar al acta oficial del árbitro. Conocía la sección de actas pero no que las amonestaciones estuviesen tan bien explicadas en otra. Muchas gracias, y si te parece bien, puedo actualizar el fair-play cuando me sea posible si veo que lleva sin actualizar un buen rato depués de salir el acta. Gracias y disculpas por mis errores. Qampunen (talk) 21:22, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Por cierto, si quieres conseguir las actas más rápidamente pon un acta cualquiera ya actualizada (como el Getafe-Villarreal por y cambias los últimos números en la dirección URL de la página a la correspondiente del Sevilla-Almería en este caso (es decir, cambias http://actas.rfef.es/actas/RFEF_CmpActa2?cod_primaria=1000144&CodActa=12529 a http://actas.rfef.es/actas/RFEF_CmpActa2?cod_primaria=1000144&CodActa=12530. Las actas están actualizadas rápidamente y tardan en publicarlas. Qampunen (talk) 21:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pequeño Gran Favor

Eso sería el broche final del proyecto. No sé cómo se podría hacer, pero sería estupendo que se pudiese conseguir. Mientras tanto habrá que hacerlo manualmente, pero ojalá que en un futuro no muy lejano lo que propones se convierta en una realidad. Un saludo. Qampunen (talk) 23:48, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, no voy a poder editar esta tarde hasta pasadas las 22:00, ¿de acuerdo?. Si pudieses ayudarme en Segunda esta tarde genial, pero si no puedes no pasa nada. Por cierto, ¿quieres editar el grupo de las Baleares (XI) de Tercera? Qampunen (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gracias, Raúl. Sobre el nombre de las comunidades en cada grupo, está puesto en el artículo Tercera División por lo que no debería ser un problema. Qampunen (talk) 21:09, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tercera

Raúl, si hoy eres el último en actualizar las tablas, cambia lo de "last updated" en la parte superior del artículo de Tercera. Lo haremos así (el último cambia la fecha). Un saludo. Qampunen (talk) 22:11, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Como eran muy pocos partidos y he visto que estás ocupado he editado el grupo VI y XI por ti. Gracias por ayudarme el domingo y gracias en general por todo tu trabajo. Qampunen (talk) 22:57, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Raúl, te he editado el grupo VI (solo había un partido) ya que es tarde y seguro que estás ocupado. Feliz año! Qampunen (talk) 23:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No te preocupes, haré todo lo que me sea posible durante ese tiempo (haré los grupos V, VI y XI de Tercera durante ese tiempo). Avísame cuando vuelvas. Un saludo, amigo! Qampunen (talk) 23:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Edit-warring, incivility, vandalism and sockpuppetry via IP. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Black Kite (t) (c) 14:30, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sat.1 broadcaster mini.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sat.1 broadcaster mini.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:32, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sat.1 broadcaster mini.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sat.1 broadcaster mini.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 08:14, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raul-Reus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I promise to not vandalise the contribs of any user by sockpupperty, not vendettas, and not insist to put non-free images as icons. More details here. Thanks

Decline reason:

you have been editing at ANI from an IP address while blocked, and do not appear to have changed your mind since this comment blaming the trouble on the admin who upheld policy. See WP:NOTTHEM for why that doesn't work.
If you stop editing under the IP address, then a fresh unblock request may be considered if you acknowledge that the block was due to your own multiple breaches of policy. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:52, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Raul-Reus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Excuses for admins, I promise sincerely to accept all rules, not vandalise anymore and not make vendettas when an admin make a resolution that it doesn't like me. Excuse me

Decline reason:

This does not address the several reasons for your block.  Sandstein  20:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Raul-Reus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I regret my behaviour to attack an admin when he works for comply the rules and I revert his contributions as a vendetta. I promise to not do more attack personal, sockpuppery to any other user for any reason. I want to help other users to collaborate on Wikipedia such as User:Niquinio to help him for upload logos according to rules for non-free images, for sign my contributions and for close the topic and continue collaborating positively to Wikipedia without no more vandalic act. Thanks

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= I regret my behaviour to attack an admin when he works for comply the rules and I revert his contributions as a vendetta. I promise to not do more attack personal, sockpuppery to any other user for any reason. I want to help other users to collaborate on Wikipedia such as [[User:Niquinio]] to help him for upload logos according to rules for non-free images, for sign my contributions and for close the topic and continue collaborating positively to Wikipedia without no more vandalic act. Thanks |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= I regret my behaviour to attack an admin when he works for comply the rules and I revert his contributions as a vendetta. I promise to not do more attack personal, sockpuppery to any other user for any reason. I want to help other users to collaborate on Wikipedia such as [[User:Niquinio]] to help him for upload logos according to rules for non-free images, for sign my contributions and for close the topic and continue collaborating positively to Wikipedia without no more vandalic act. Thanks |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= I regret my behaviour to attack an admin when he works for comply the rules and I revert his contributions as a vendetta. I promise to not do more attack personal, sockpuppery to any other user for any reason. I want to help other users to collaborate on Wikipedia such as [[User:Niquinio]] to help him for upload logos according to rules for non-free images, for sign my contributions and for close the topic and continue collaborating positively to Wikipedia without no more vandalic act. Thanks |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Raul-Reus&oldid=411779143"