Jump to content

Talk:Batman Forever

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Jhenderson777 (talk | contribs) at 20:28, 3 February 2011 (WP:CBFILM). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Good articleBatman Forever has been listed as one of the good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2007Good article nomineeListed
November 18, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 12, 2008Good topic candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article
WikiProject iconFilm: American GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
WikiProject iconComics: DC Comics GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Gotham City article info

There's a fair amount of information at Gotham City which is not reflected here in this article. Would someone please bring over anythign that can be used, and delete anything which you can refute based on the research and info here? I don't want to randomly throw in facts from there to here and significantly throw off all the work that got this a GA, but there's abotu zero apparent overlap between the two articles. ThuranX (talk) 14:54, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Box office grosses

It says in this article that Batman Forever is the 4th highest grossing Batman film to date. Under the Batman Returns article, it says that Batman Returns is the 4th highest grossing Batman film to date. Which is it?Vesus (talk) 03:37, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Vesus as of 2008, Batman Forever is currently the fourth highest grossing Batman film to date. Remember The Dark Knight, and it knocked down Batman Returns from the fourth to the fifth. See below.

list of the highest grossing Batman films as of 2007 1. Batman (1989) 2. Batman Begins (2005) 3. Batman Forever (1995) 4. Batman Returns (1992) 5. Batman and Robin (1997) 6. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1994)

list of the highest grossing Batman films as of 2008 1. The Dark Knight (2008) 2. Batman (1989) 3. Batman Begins (2005) 4. Batman Forever (1995) 5. Batman Returns (1992) 6. Batman and Robin (1997) 7. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm (1994) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Christianster45 (talkcontribs) 18:16, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just done a date audit and discovered that the monobook script is suddenly removing such links. I've checked with the programmer. In fact, I think WikiProject film might already deprecate such links. Please let me know if you want me to revert (or are reverting yourselves—feedback would be good). Tony (talk) 03:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say have the links in there. Considering this is a '95 film, 1995 in film is a better link than simply 1995. Plus, and this is just me, I'm sometimes curious what other films came out that year and the link is a nice thing to have. Anakinjmt (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "original cut"

I appreciate the info, but we seriously need to find some other way to summarize this whole thing. Any suggestions? Wildroot (talk) 06:55, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Summarizing might be good, but surely we would lose information in doing that? The list I posted is not the complete list, just the most important changes.JesusFreak89 (talk) 06:46, 7 January 2009 (UTC)JesusFreak89[reply]

Sugar and Spice fate

The Movie is ambiguous as to the fate of Sugar and Spice-it only shows them running away on stairs under the platform after Nigma's carrier beam is destroyed. Was it planned that way in the original script? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.83.126.88 (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]