User talk:Doc James/Archive 16

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Doc James. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 14

→

using my own blog as reference or link

I would appreciate if you could assist me in understanding the rules Wikipedia uses. I am an expert in anaerobic infections and other infectious diseases. I have blog sites on Anaerobic infections and sinusitis that contain important information. Can I use my blogs as reference or additional links? Since these blogs are mine and contain only my writings there is no copyright issue involved. I would appreciate your guidance. thanks I Brook MD — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dribrook (talk • contribs) 21:13, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Concussion

You [reverted a gf IP edit for want of a ref. A scholar search on "King-Devick Neurology" finds the primary study xhe mentioned here. To me, it looks pretty straightforward, but it is recent and primary. Do you think it should go in? LeadSongDog come howl! 17:54, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The N was 39. We need to use reviews. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 00:47, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. We can wait for reviews. The test itself has been well reviewed, but that application is novel. Given that it is inexpensive, non-invasive, requires next to no equipment or training and has large potential impact but zero profit opportunities, I'm pretty sure it will be ignored for a long time before any larger studies are done. Ah, well, perhaps an insurer will fund them... LeadSongDog come howl! 22:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Note

Hi. Regarding the ANI unblock review, I have inserted the user link for clarity here. Please feel free to revert if you prefer. Cheers, Ncmvocalist (talk) 14:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)