Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tasteless

Tasteless

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable gamer. Off2riorob (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC) Off2riorob (talk) 14:27, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can not think of anything why he is notable.--Stone (talk) 14:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep but Rename: From Wikipedia:Notability_(sports), "have participated in a major international amateur or professional competition at the highest level". Article should be renamed to Nick Plott (which is currently a redirect). I know notability is not inherited (Sean Plott is his brother), but he did compete in the 2005 World Cyber Games, which I believem meets the requirements for notability. Turlo Lomon (talk) 16:25, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per lack of third party sources confirming notability. Jonathanwallace (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - [1] Liquipedia is considered a reliable source for members of the pro-starcraft community. de Bivort 16:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a reliable source for Wikipedia, however. --Teancum (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not true. It meets all the WP:RS guidelines. Also, rename de Bivort 20:10, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:SPS. Teamliquid is a fansite and a wiki. I have a wiki about my cat, but that doesn't make it a reliable source for Wikipedia. tedder (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This brings up a question about the TeamLiquid player database. It's cited in WCG information, in almost all StarCraft related news, etc. And per WP:USEBYOTHERS I'm tempted to say the teamliquid player database is a reliable source, if used to verify information or statistics. (It's not wiki format) NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 00:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
comment if kept, rename since tasteless is the absence of taste or bad taste, and there are articles related to that. A disambiguation page should be primary. 65.93.15.125 (talk) 05:08, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Has not received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Quantpole (talk) 09:33, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This economist article mentions the english commentary, but not Plott by name, though it does mention his brother by name. de Bivort 20:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added significant number of sources, removed possibly contentious BLP materials. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 00:18, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep multiple sources from reputable websites and I think that certain sections of the text could be enlarged as they seem to be more of a short summary than proper prose.