User talk:Shivammathur

Caution

If you continue to edit disruptively - repeatedly recreating the same promotional article, repeatedly removing the speedy deletion notice, and repeatedly blanking warnings from your Talk page without taking notice of them, you are very likely to be blocked from editing. It is only through good faith that I have not deleted your latest version of that article and have left it to another admin to decide - please do not abuse that good faith. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:33, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:37, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Shivammathur (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i was just trying to make an article sam 10:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i was just trying to make an article 
 sam 10:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i was just trying to make an article 
 sam 10:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i was just trying to make an article 
 sam 10:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi. If you want to appeal your block, please place your unblock request below the block notice. Do not remove the block notice, or the reviewing admin will not be able to see the block details. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it up properly for you now. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly recreated the same promotional article, which has been deleted three times now. You have also ignored the multiple warnings you have received, blanking each one from your Talk page, and have repeatedly removed speedy deletion notices from the article. The reviewing admin will, I am sure, look at your Talk page history and take this into account when making a decision. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:01, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference, please have a read of WP:N to learn about Wikipedia's notability standards for articles, especially WP:NCORP, which covers corporations and organizations. Also have a look at WP:RS to learn about the kind of Independent coverage that you need to provide to source an article. And the Manual of Style should help you avoid writing material promotionally. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:04, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]