Jump to content

Talk:Unknown (2011 film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ilkeston1990 (talk | contribs) at 22:42, 14 March 2011 (critics and reviews). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconFilm: German / American C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the German cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

synopsis

Where's the short synopsis for films? Wikipedia ought to apply the standard encyclopedic (read: practical) rules to the film articles, requiring a short synopsis in the heading. Rtdrury (talk) 00:47, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Frantic

It should be noted that much of the movie is based on the earlier film Frantic with Harrison Ford. The shower-escape scene and the sidekick girl character are straight out of that movie, as well as the overarching premise (Doctor visits European capital, and loses wife, no one will believe him, then he finds sidekick girl, who (reluctantly at first) helps him out, and ends up falling for him. I could go on with the similarities, but if you've seen both movies, they'll be obvious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.127.160 (talk) 04:55, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Man Who Haunted Himself

I think it should be noted that much of the movie is based on the earlier film The Man Who Haunted Himself with Roger Moore.--JakobvS (talk) 13:17, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

critics and reviews

one unreferenced view is not the general consensus. Putting in a reference to a website but not the review is not support it's misrepresentation, it's like I put a reference in that pointed to google news and expecting the person to search for a news article for proof X-mass (talk) 23:34, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


The article is not too long it is just right Ilkeston1990 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)