Talk:Evangelical environmentalism
Christianity Stub‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
This page needs attention
This is a topic of critical importance to modern Christianity and to the world in general. It needs help.
Reverted heavily POV edits
I reverted a series of changes by anonymous User:70.118.249.125 to the last good version of the article. (i.e. last good version, highly POV edits, changes between the two). Please refrain from using Wikipedia as a political soapbox. Thank you. - Anirvan (talk) 08:38, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
Anirvan - the evangelical environmntal movement is a political movement, and therefore must be discussed as such. To remove references to politics is incorrect. The ECI, for example lobbied for cap and trade and is most definitely a political organization. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.104.143.108 (talk) 17:02, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Yes, it should be discussed as a political movement, but biased opinion does nothing useful for wikipedia. I agree with Anirvan, "Please refrain from using Wikipedia as a political soapbox." If you wish to slander the movement, at least ground your criticisms to actual events.
Add stewardship within Planetary boundaries?
Add stewardship within Planetary boundaries? 99.112.212.121 (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- Why? 02:10, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
Add Creation includes all Life on Earth, thus good stewardship would avoid extinctions, such as with the current Holocene extinction.
Add Creation includes all Life on Earth, thus good stewardship would avoid extinctions, such as with the current Holocene extinction. 99.112.212.121 (talk) 19:29, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
- No. Not all evangelicals are creationists. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Who said all evangelicals are creationists, only Special:Contributions/Arthur_Rubin? 99.181.140.5 (talk) 05:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC)