Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 March 26
Appearance
March 26
Category:Watermills in Syria
- Category:Watermills in Syria - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Only contains one noria from the country—not a watermill—and the article on norias in general. —innotata 21:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:Former film project articles
- Category:Former film project articles - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Why are we tracking what articles used to be? I can see the point of the tracking category Category:Film projects, but entirely miss the purpose of this one. Xeworlebi (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- These articles are tracked as a reference for editors developing film project articles. These articles provide style guidance to articles going through the same process. As in the case of Category:Articles in the Article Incubator moved back into mainspace.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough, as Innotata points out, this (and Category:Film projects) should be moved to the talk page instead of in article space. Xeworlebi (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- To my view, we shouldn't even have "film project" articles, except in extreme circumstances where there is a wealth of information that cannot be housed elsewhere, as by definition they fail WP:NFF. Therefore I think that tracking them will only encourage these kind of articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- If this for a project, it should be added to the talk pages of articles, not articles themselves. —innotata 02:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I agree this category and it's parent category are better suited for the talk page. However this is not a Wikipedia Project so if it cannot be added to talk pages then perhaps they should be deleted.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 13:43, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:1958 in Zimbabwe
- Category:1958 in Zimbabwe - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Rename to Category:1958 in Southern Rhodesia. not independent in 1958. Soman (talk) 14:25, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment – there are a lot more of these in Category:Years of the 20th century in Zimbabwe and Category:Years of the 19th century in Zimbabwe. I can't offhand see what the problem would be with using the correct name for the country in each year (within the parent Category:Years in Zimbabwe), especially as Southern Rhodesian general election, 1958 makes no mention of Zimbabwe. (I think an article should only be placed in categories which follow immediately from the contents of the article without needing extraneous info. I am not suggesting that Zimbabwe should be inserted into every article that mentions Rhodesia.) Occuli (talk) 15:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- WikiProject Zimbabwe notified, and WikiProject Former countries notified. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:48, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Why did the nominator not do a group nomination of all the similar categories?
It seems to me that since the state of Zimbabwe came into existence in 1980, it is worth considering the possibility that all preceding by-year categories should use the de facto contemporaneous name. I am unsure how this has been handled in other former colonies, which is why I have notified WikiProject Former countries. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:18, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:1959 in the Republic of the Congo
- Category:1959 in the Republic of the Congo - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Rename to Category:1959 in Moyen-Congo. Republic of Congo not independent in 1959. Soman (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:1946 in the Republic of the Congo
- Category:1946 in the Republic of the Congo - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Rename to Category:1946 in Moyen-Congo. Republic of Congo not independent in 1946. Soman (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:1947 in the Republic of the Congo
- Category:1947 in the Republic of the Congo - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Rename to Category:1947 in Moyen-Congo. Republic of Congo not independent in 1947. Soman (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)