Talk:Traffic enforcement camera

Robotics B‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement B‑class

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Transport Unassessed

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Archives of past discussion

Archive 1
Archive 2

Merger proposal

I propose merging the content of Red light camera into this article. Both articles as they presently stand are fairly solid bases for a good bit of improvement, and merging them will coördinate editors' efforts more efficiently, without duplicative work. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C07:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Red-light cameras are a subset of this topic.Socrates2008 (Talk) 10:04, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose a merge at this stage. They are different topics. There is nothing in either of those posts (especially the second!), which tells me why they should be merged, apart from some hypothetical ease of editing. To merge two different topics needs better logic than that. HiLo48 (talk) 10:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I oppose a merge at this stage. Currently the three main uses for these cameras have their own articles and each article has a good deal of content in its own right. What benefits would a merge bring and how do you propose to stop the merge unbalancing the article? If you can see how to improve the articles then please do so, but please do it as two separate articles. PeterEastern (talk) 15:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Initially I was minded to support, however on reflection and considering the RLC article is pretty long and detailed I oppose a merge at this stage. Springnuts (talk) 20:46, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose While it is a subset, the Red-Light Camera Article goes into way more detail, and alot of that would be lost if it was merged into this article.

Garrett247 (talk) 09:12, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]