Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2011 March 26
Appearance
March 26
Category:Watermills in Syria
- Category:Watermills in Syria - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Only contains one noria from the country—not a watermill—and the article on norias in general. —innotata 21:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- keep article says noria is a watermill so its a watermill. Keep as part of an established structure of Category:Watermills by country. Hmains (talk) 02:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Norias aren't watermills, and the article doesn't say so. —innotata 02:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- I am corrected. Category should be deleted as nominated. Hmains (talk) 00:48, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
- Norias aren't watermills, and the article doesn't say so. —innotata 02:55, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:Former film project articles
- Category:Former film project articles - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Why are we tracking what articles used to be? I can see the point of the tracking category Category:Film projects, but entirely miss the purpose of this one. Xeworlebi (talk) 21:13, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- These articles are tracked as a reference for editors developing film project articles. These articles provide style guidance to articles going through the same process. As in the case of Category:Articles in the Article Incubator moved back into mainspace.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 01:58, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough, as Innotata points out, this (and Category:Film projects) should be moved to the talk page instead of in article space. Xeworlebi (talk) 11:08, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- To my view, we shouldn't even have "film project" articles, except in extreme circumstances where there is a wealth of information that cannot be housed elsewhere, as by definition they fail WP:NFF. Therefore I think that tracking them will only encourage these kind of articles. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:28, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- If this for a project, it should be added to the talk pages of articles, not articles themselves. —innotata 02:28, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- Done, moved category to the talk pages. --TriiipleThreat (talk) 16:17, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I still think that this is of dubious value. It's not clear that these articles followed a proper style anyways and guidelines change. If this category is kept, then it must be completely separated from mainspace categories to avoid both confusion and incentive to create more articles of the sort (as Rob pointed out above). Pichpich (talk) 22:05, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
Category:1958 in Zimbabwe
Category:1959 in the Republic of the Congo
Category:1946 in the Republic of the Congo
- Category:1946 in the Republic of the Congo - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Rename to Category:1946 in Moyen-Congo. Republic of Congo not independent in 1946. Soman (talk) 14:21, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- See comment above at 1958. Tim! (talk) 06:21, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- No, Republic of the Congo and AEF were not the same. AEF was a wider territorial unit, consisting of four French colonies (Moyen-Congo, Gabon, Chad and Oubang-Chari). Moyen-Congo changed name to RoC in 1958, as commented above. --Soman (talk) 13:15, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Moyen-Congo was the official title before the 1958 referendum (from the article), though there is no indication in the article of when this title was adopted. But rather than having categories of "Years in French Equatorial Africa" as well, it would be preferable to keep to the earlier title for each colony (even back to the 19th century?). And the CAR seems to have had the earlier spellings of either Oubangi-Chari or Ubangi-Shari. Hugo999 (talk) 23:11, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Category:1947 in the Republic of the Congo
- Category:1947 in the Republic of the Congo - Template:Lc1
- Nominator's rationale: Rename to Category:1947 in Moyen-Congo. Republic of Congo not independent in 1947. Soman (talk) 14:20, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
- See comment above at 1958. Tim! (talk) 06:22, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- See comment under 1946. --Soman (talk) 13:16, 31 March 2011 (UTC)