Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clare Mulley
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Joe Decker (talk | contribs) at 23:37, 3 April 2011 (Closing debate, result was keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Withdrawn without other objection joe deckertalk to me 23:37, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Clare Mulley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Withdrawn by nominator. Changes made to the article since nomination clearly (in my opinion) establish notability through the GNG criteria. Respectfully, Cind.amuse 09:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG. Only sources are the author's website and a review on the Daily Mail website. Author is a past winner of the Daily Mail Biographers' Club prize, but this doesn't equate to receiving significant critical attention. Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable and independent sources. Cind.amuse 15:42, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clare Mulley has written an important book on a notable subject, Eglantyne Jebb, founder of Save the Children. As illustrated in 6 external links, the book has received favorable reviews in print and electronic media, including The Times, The Guardian, The Daily Mail, The Express, the BBC and the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Nihil novi (talk) 09:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I concur and in response have withdrawn the nomination. Thanks for the additions you have made to the article. When I presented the article for deletion, it was only supported with one reliable and independent reference (Daily Mail). The fourth ref does not support the content that it reportedly cites, and the other refs are to the authors personal website. The recent external links are improperly formatted, making it difficult to determine how they support the article content. That said, the additions to the article since nomination clearly (in my opinion) establish notability through the GNG criteria. I would recommend that you reformat the external links as inline citations. Best regards, Cind.amuse 09:28, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, this is Clare Mulley. Thank you very much to those people who helped put the appropriate references etc on this page. Dear moderator, is this discussion now closed, and if so can I remove the red 'this article is considered for deletion' box form the top of the wiki page? Thanks all, Clare — Preceding unsigned comment added by Margaret Webb (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Clare, please wait for the discussion to officially close. At that time, an administrator should make the appropriate notations on the article. Thanks, Cind.amuse 11:33, 1 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, many thanks. Clare Margaret Webb (talk) 09:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.