User talk:Tassosl

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lambda-bottle-01.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Lambda-bottle-01.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lambda-bottle-02.jpg

I have tagged File:Lambda-bottle-02.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lambda-gift-box.jpg

I have tagged File:Lambda-gift-box.jpg as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 08:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpeironCo-Logo.png

I have tagged File:SpeironCo-Logo.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 08:42, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non Free Images in your User Space

Hey there Tassosl, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Tassosl/Speiron Co. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

See a log of images removed today here

Shut off the bot here

Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 21:51, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:SpeironCo-Logo.png

I have tagged File:SpeironCo-Logo.png as {{orphaned fairuse}}. In order for the image to be kept at Wikipedia, it must be included in at least one article. Otherwise, it will be deleted in seven days. Melesse (talk) 05:32, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Giorgos Kolliopoulos

A tag has been placed on Giorgos Kolliopoulos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 11:54, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lambda-bottle-01.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lambda-bottle-01.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 15:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Speiron icon.png

Thank you for uploading File:Speiron icon.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:49, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was declined, and Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Giorgos Kolliopoulos was not created. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer, and please feel free to request article creation again once the issues have been addressed. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! mono 04:59, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Lambda-gift-box.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Lambda-gift-box.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lambda olive Oil

In reply to your posting on my talk page; yes, I did delete this article because it appeared to be promotional. Any article which specifically relates to a particular brand of a product tends to appear in this way. But I would concede that there are brands (Coca-cola, wimpey are good examples) where is does not apply. If you would like to look at the relevant policies (WP:NN, WP:ADVERT) and then if you choose, re-apply to me, I will happily restore the original article for you to improve. Let mew know when you are ready - I am here every day. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 21:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK; you mention several references, which may well be perfectly sound. They are not included in the article. we do not expect that readers here should go and find their own references - they have to be up front in your text. And, I have got to say, the tone of the article still seems to me to be promotional in context. But, having said that, I propose to restore the article and see what you can do with it. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 18:33, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lambda olive oil for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lambda olive oil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambda olive oil until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Peridon (talk) 18:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]