Jump to content

User talk:110.174.23.139

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 110.174.23.139 (talk) at 09:32, 12 April 2011 (→April 2011). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Hello, 110.174.23.139, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Magenta

The source you cited didn't even make any sense, in either the question or the answer. Yes, magenta is the color of a mixture of red and blue light; that's what magenta light is. No mystery. But there's no wavelength of that color, so it's not a "spectral" color. Dicklyon (talk) 16:17, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since you replied on my talk page instead of here, I replied to that there. Dicklyon (talk) 03:09, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Furthermore, I recommend you float your idea on Talk:Magenta before putting nonsense into the article again. Dicklyon (talk) 03:11, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I replied over at user talk:Dicklyon#Magenta Color. Sorry 110.174.23.139, you seem to be confused about how color vision works. If you would like, I could recommend some better sources to read. –jacobolus (t) 20:17, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I'll revert it as I do not want to be unreasonable. I acknowledge that much information exists supporting Magenta as a supposedly extra-spectral color. I do believe that with an extended discussion I can demonstrate that the logic behind any color being extra(or Non) spectral is flawed. One could start by exploring Qualia and get into semantics. What I will try to do is get in contact with people (incl Ken Mellendorf) that support Magenta as a transmissible light wavelength.

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Top Ryde City appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Top Ryde City, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

I've responded to your post on the talk page for Top Ryde City and reverted your reversion. I get that you're aggrieved by the shopping centre in some way, but please don't try to reintroduce uncited quotes and content that is not neutral. -danjel (talk to me) 13:00, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Top Ryde City. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Top Ryde City. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits are not neutral. I have tried to engage you on the talk page, consider discussing the issue if you are having trouble putting it in neutral wording. -danjel (talk to me) 06:05, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have brought the issue of your recent reverts to the Administrators Noticeboard. You can find the report at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:110.174.23.139_reported_by_User:Danjel_.28Result:_.29. -danjel (talk to me) 10:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 05:13, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

3RR breakage at Top Ryde City

I have been reviewing the report at WP:AN3#User:110.174.23.139 reported by User:Danjel (Result: ). You have broken the WP:3RR rule on this article. If you agree to take a break from editing this article for seven days, a block might still be avoided. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:110.174.23.139&oldid=423657429"