Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Ter Horst (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Damiens.rf (talk | contribs) at 01:29, 28 April 2011 (Creating deletion discussion page for Rachel Ter Horst. (TW)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Rachel Ter Horst (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable. Being chosen Playmate of the Month or Playmate of the Year is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts solely related to their playmatehood are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria. Damiens.rf 01:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]