Jump to content

Talk:Mitsubishi F-15J

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sabuell (talk | contribs) at 16:31, 29 April 2011 (Improvements to the English: thx). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconAviation: Aircraft Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
B checklist
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the aircraft project.
WikiProject iconMilitary history: Aviation / Asian / Japanese C‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
B checklist
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Military aviation task force
Taskforce icon
Asian military history task force
Taskforce icon
Japanese military history task force

The modernization start of the F-15Js

As for the F-15J, it was written in the ja:F-15 that the modernization was planned (National Defense Program Guidelines for FY 2005) in 2004. I was not able to find the source by english. Do you know it? thanks.--Sabuell (talk) 18:17, 16 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added in Japanese. But, I do not yet know the source by english which wrote the details of the Japanese MSIP. For example, the vector completely identified early production with a MSIP.--Sabuell (talk) 18:45, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Improvements to the English

I am working on some improvements to the writing of this article, as there are numerous grammar, syntax and discourse errors in the English. I appreciate whoever took the time to write in the content and mean no offense, but this is necessary for it to be a satisfactory article in my language. I have already completed the introductory text and the Development section. My edits are meant to change only the wording, not the meaning of the text. In some cases, it was difficult to make out what the meaning was precisely, so it's probably not perfect, but I think I've come close in most of it. This is my first time editing and I don't have any special attachment to the article, so if anyone else has any better ideas go ahead and revert/change as necessary. 67.183.71.73 (talk) 21:18, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Because i was not native, this article was helped by you.--Sabuell (talk) 16:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]